- 06 Apr, 2023 25 commits
-
-
Ojaswin Mujoo authored
This patch makes the following changes: * Rename ext4_mb_pa_free to ext4_mb_pa_put_free to better reflect its purpose * Add new ext4_mb_pa_free() which only handles freeing * Refactor ext4_mb_pa_callback() to use ext4_mb_pa_free() There are no functional changes in this patch Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b273bc9cbf5bd278f641fa5bc6c0cc9e6cb3330c.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Ojaswin Mujoo authored
If we come across a PA that matches the logical offset but is unable to satisfy a non-extent file due to its physical start being higher than that supported by non extent files, then simply stop searching for another PA and break out of loop. This is because, since PAs don't overlap, we won't be able to find another inode PA which can satisfy the original request. Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/42404ca29bd304ae2c962184c3c32a02e8eefcd0.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Theodore Ts'o authored
In cases where we have an obvious way of continuing, let's use WARN_RATELIMITED() instead of BUG_ON(). Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Result of EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb) is already stored in sbi at beginning of ext4_mb_normalize_request. Use sbi instead of EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb) to remove unnecessary pointer dereference. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230311170949.1047958-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
pa_plen -> pa_len pa_start -> pa_pstart Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230311170949.1047958-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We try to allocate a block from goal in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple. We only need get blkoff in first group with goal and set blkoff to 0 for the rest groups. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-21-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Just remove comment code in ext4_discard_preallocations. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-20-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Call trace to assign ac_f_ex: ext4_mb_use_best_found ac->ac_f_ex = ac->ac_b_ex; ext4_mb_new_preallocation ext4_mb_new_group_pa ac->ac_f_ex = ac->ac_b_ex; ext4_mb_new_inode_pa ac->ac_f_ex = ac->ac_b_ex; Actually allocated blocks is already stored in ac_f_ex in ext4_mb_use_best_found, so there is no need to assign ac_f_ex in ext4_mb_new_group_pa and ext4_mb_new_inode_pa. Just remove repeat assignment to ac_f_ex in ext4_mb_new_group_pa and ext4_mb_new_inode_pa. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-19-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
When ext4_read_block_bitmap fails, we can return PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh) to remove unnecessary NULL check of bitmap_bh. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-18-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
count2 is always 1 in mb_debug, just remove unnecessary count2. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-17-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We goto exit_meta_group_info only to return -ENOMEM. Return -ENOMEM directly instead of goto to remove this unnecessary tag. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-16-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
If any bex which meets bex->fe_len >= gex->fe_len is found, then it will always be used when complex scan of group that bex belongs to finishs. So there will not be any lock-unlock period. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-15-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Only call trace of ext4_mb_check_limits is as following: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group ext4_mb_measure_extent ext4_mb_check_limits(ac, e4b, 0); ext4_mb_check_limits(ac, e4b, 1); If the first ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_max_to_scan check in ext4_mb_check_limits is met, we will set ac_status to AC_STATUS_BREAK and call ext4_mb_try_best_found to try to use ac->ac_b_ex. If ext4_mb_try_best_found successes, then block allocation finishs, the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check is not reachable. If ext4_mb_try_best_found fails, then we set EXT4_MB_HINT_FIRST and reset ac->ac_b_ex to retry block allocation. We will use any found free extent in ext4_mb_measure_extent before reach the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check. In summary, the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check is not reachable and we can remove that dead check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-14-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We always adjust first to even number and adjust last to odd number, so first == last will never happen. Remove this dead check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-13-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
1. remove unnecessary ac check: We always go to out tag before ac is successfully allocated, then we can move out tag after free of ac and remove NULL check of ac. 2. remove unnecessary *errp check: We always go to errout tag if *errp is non-zero, then we can move errout tag into error handle if *errp is non-zero. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-12-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
e4b->bd_buddy_page is only set if we initialize ext4_buddy successfully. So e4b->bd_buddy_page is always NULL in error handle branch. Just remove the dead check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
If we alloc array of buffer_head failed, there is no resource need to be freed and we can simpily return error. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-10-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Return value static function ext4_mb_try_best_found and ext4_mb_free_metadata is not used. Just remove unused return value. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Release bitmap buffer_head we got if error occurs. Besides, this patch remove unused assignment to err. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
If ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used fails in ext4_mb_new_blocks, we may discard pa already in list. Protect pa with pa_lock to avoid race. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
As we don't correct pa_lstart here, so there is no need to subtract pa_lstart with consumed len. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We will add pa_free to s_mb_preallocated when new ext4_prealloc_space is created. In ext4_mb_new_inode_pa, we will call ext4_mb_use_inode_pa before adding pa_free to s_mb_preallocated. However, ext4_mb_use_inode_pa will consume pa_free for block allocation which triggerred the creation of ext4_prealloc_space. Add pa_free to s_mb_preallocated before ext4_mb_use_inode_pa to correct calculation of s_mb_preallocated. There is no such problem in ext4_mb_new_group_pa as pa_free of group pa is consumed in ext4_mb_release_context instead of ext4_mb_use_group_pa. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We always get ext4_group_desc with group + 1 and ext4_group_info with group to check if we need do initialize ext4_group_info for the group. Just get ext4_group_desc with group for ext4_group_info initialization check. Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
If EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set, ext4_mb_regular_allocator will only allocate blocks from ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Allow to find by goal in ext4_mb_find_by_goal if EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set or allocation with EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY set will always fail. EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is not used at all, so the problem is not found for now. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We need to set ac_g_ex to notify the goal start used in ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Set ac_g_ex instead of ac_f_ex in ext4_mb_normalize_request. Besides we should assure goal start is in range [first_data_block, blocks_count) as ext4_mb_initialize_context does. [ Added a check to make sure size is less than ar->pright; otherwise we could end up passing an underflowed value of ar->pright - size to ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(), which will trigger a BUG_ON later on. - TYT ] Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 Mar, 2023 13 commits
-
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Remove unused group parameter in ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set. After this, group parameter in ext4_set_bitmap_checksums is also not used, just remove it too. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221203027.2359920-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Remove unused group parameter in ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221203027.2359920-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Remove unused group parameter in ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_set. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221203027.2359920-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Remove unused group parameter in ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_verify. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221203027.2359920-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
As inode table blocks are contiguous, inode table blocks inside the block_group can be represented as range [itbl_cluster_start, itbl_cluster_last]. Then we can simply account inode table cluters and check cluster overlap with [itbl_cluster_start, itbl_cluster_last] instead of traverse each block of inode table. By the way, this patch fixes code style problem of comment for ext4_num_overhead_clusters. [ Merged fix-up patch which fixed potentially access to an uninitialzied stack variable. --TYT ] Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303171446.eLEhZzAu-lkp@intel.com/Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
For case we initialize a bitmap bh, we will set bitmap bh verified. We can return immediately instead of goto verify to remove unnecessary work for trying to verify bitmap bh. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
Commit bdfb6ff4 ("ext4: mark group corrupt on group descriptor checksum") added flag to indicate corruption of group instead of marking all blocks used. Just remove stale comment. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We only call ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa if there is no meta_bg feature or group does not reach first_meta_bg, so group must not reside in meta group. Then group has a global gdt if superblock exists. Just remove confusing branch that meta_bg feature exists. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
ext4_num_base_meta_clusters is already aware of meta_bg feature and test if block_group is inside real meta block groups before calling ext4_bg_num_gdb. Then ext4_bg_num_gdb will check if block group is inside a real meta block groups again to decide either ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa is needed. Call ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa directly after we check if block_group is inside a meta block groups in ext4_num_base_meta_clusters to remove redundant check of meta block groups in ext4_bg_num_gdb. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
1.Last valid cluster of inode table is EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1). We should make sure last valid cluster is < max_bit, i.e., EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) is < max_bit rather than EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) is < max_bit. 2.Bit search length should be last valid cluster plus 1, i.e., EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) + 1 rather than EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group). Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Kemeng Shi authored
We mark buffer_head of bitmap successfully initialized even error occurs in ext4_init_block_bitmap. Although we will return error, we will get a invalid buffer_head of bitmap from next ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait which is marked buffer_verified but not successfully initialized actually in previous ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait. Fix this by only marking buffer_head successfully initialized if ext4_init_block_bitmap successes. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Theodore Ts'o authored
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
Jan Kara authored
Test generic/390 in data=journal mode often triggers a warning that ext4_do_writepages() tries to start a transaction on frozen filesystem. This happens because although all dirty data is properly written, jbd2 checkpointing code writes data through submit_bh() and as a result only buffer dirty bits are cleared but page dirty bits stay set. Later when the filesystem is frozen, writeback code comes, tries to write supposedly dirty pages and the warning triggers. Fix the problem by calling sync_filesystem() once more after flushing the whole journal to clear stray page dirty bits. [ Applied fixup patches to address crashes when running data=journal tests; see links for more details -- TYT ] Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308142528.12384-1-jack@suse.czReported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230319183617.GA896@sol.localdomain Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230323145404.21381-1-jack@suse.cz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230323145404.21381-2-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 Mar, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Jan Kara authored
Add support for writeback of journalled data directly into ext4_writepages() instead of offloading it to write_cache_pages(). This actually significantly simplifies the code and reduces code duplication. For checkpointing of committed data we can use ext4_writepages() rightaway the same way as writeback of ordered data uses it on transaction commit. For journalling of dirty mapped pages, we need to add a special case to mpage_prepare_extent_to_map() to add all page buffers to the journal. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228051319.4085470-8-tytso@mit.edu
-
Jan Kara authored
In case mpage_submit_page() returns error, it doesn't really matter whether we call mpage_page_done() and then return error or whether we return directly because in that case page cleanup will be done by mpage_release_unused_pages() instead. Logically, it makes more sense to leave the cleanup to mpage_release_unused_pages() because we didn't succeed in writing the page. So move mpage_page_done() calls after the error handling. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228051319.4085470-7-tytso@mit.edu
-