1. 17 Feb, 2010 10 commits
  2. 16 Feb, 2010 22 commits
  3. 15 Feb, 2010 6 commits
  4. 14 Feb, 2010 2 commits
    • Frederic Weisbecker's avatar
      reiserfs: Fix softlockup while waiting on an inode · 175359f8
      Frederic Weisbecker authored
      When we wait for an inode through reiserfs_iget(), we hold
      the reiserfs lock. And waiting for an inode may imply waiting
      for its writeback. But the inode writeback path may also require
      the reiserfs lock, which leads to a deadlock.
      
      We just need to release the reiserfs lock from reiserfs_iget()
      to fix this.
      Reported-by: default avatarAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
      Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      175359f8
    • Clemens Ladisch's avatar
      firewire: ohci: retransmit isochronous transmit packets on cycle loss · 7f51a100
      Clemens Ladisch authored
      In isochronous transmit DMA descriptors, link the skip address pointer
      back to the descriptor itself.  When a cycle is lost, the controller
      will send the packet in the next cycle, instead of terminating the
      entire DMA program.
      
      There are two reasons for this:
      
      * This behaviour is compatible with the old IEEE1394 stack.  Old
        applications would not expect the DMA program to stop in this case.
      
      * Since the OHCI driver does not report any uncompleted packets, the
        context would stop silently; clients would not have any chance to
        detect and handle this error without a watchdog timer.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarClemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
      
      Pieter Palmers notes:
      
      "The reason I added this retry behavior to the old stack is because some
      cards now and then fail to send a packet (e.g. the o2micro card in my
      dell laptop).  I couldn't figure out why exactly this happens, my best
      guess is that the card cannot fetch the payload data on time.  This
      happens much more frequently when sending large packets, which leads me
      to suspect that there are some contention issues with the DMA that fills
      the transmit FIFO.
      
      In the old stack it was a pretty critical issue as it resulted in a
      freeze of the userspace application.
      
      The omission of a packet doesn't necessarily have to be an issue.  E.g.
      in IEC61883 streams the DBC field can be used to detect discontinuities
      in the stream.  So as long as the other side doesn't bail when no
      [packet] is present in a cycle, there is not really a problem.
      
      I'm not convinced though that retrying is the proper solution, but it is
      simple and effective for what it had to do.  And I think there are no
      reasons not to do it this way.  Userspace can still detect this by
      checking the cycle the descriptor was sent in."
      
      Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (changelog, comment)
      7f51a100