- 22 Apr, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
The devm_clk_get_enabled() helper: - calls devm_clk_get() - calls clk_prepare_enable() and registers what is needed in order to call clk_disable_unprepare() when needed, as a managed resource. This simplifies the code and avoids the need of a dedicated function used with devm_add_action_or_reset(). Signed-off-by:Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by:
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5d04e453a4da5cfafb56695a17157fa3ea296511.1672484831.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.frSigned-off-by:
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
Make use of dev_err_probe() also for error paths that don't have to handle -EPROBE_DEFER. While the code handing -EPROBE_DEFER isn't used for these error paths, it still simpler as it cares for pretty printing the error code and usually needs one code line less as it combines message emitting and error returning. This also unifies the format of the error messages. Signed-off-by:
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
This is a preparation for making more use of dev_err_probe(). The idea is that s3c2410_get_wdt_drv_data() (as it's called only by .probe()) can make effective use of dev_err_probe() only if it returns an int. For that the assignment to wdt->drv_data has to happen in the function. The caller can then just pass on the return value in the error case. This seems to be nicer for the compiler: bloatometer reports for an ARCH=arm s3c6400_defconfig build: add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 4/-64 (-60) Function old new delta __initcall__kmod_s3c2410_wdt__209_821_s3c2410wdt_driver_init6 - 4 +4 __initcall__kmod_s3c2410_wdt__209_819_s3c2410wdt_driver_init6 4 - -4 s3c2410wdt_probe 1332 1272 -60 There is no semantical change. (Just one minor difference: Before this patch wdt->drv_data was always assigned, now that only happens in the non-error case. That doesn't matter however as *wdt is freed in the error case.) Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
This allows to drop the .remove() function as it only exists to unregister the watchdog device which is now done in a callback registered by devm_watchdog_register_device(). Signed-off-by:
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307070404.2256308-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
This allows to drop the .remove() function as it only exists to unregister the watchdog device which is now done in a callback registered by devm_watchdog_register_device(). Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
This allows to drop the .remove() function as it only exists to unregister the watchdog device which is now done in a callback registered by devm_watchdog_register_device(). Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Wensheng authored
If the sbsa_gwdt is enabled by BIOS, the kernel set WDOG_HW_RUNNING bit and keep it alive before anyone else would open it. When system suspend, the sbsa_gwdt would not be disabled because WDOG_ACTIVE is not set. Then the sbsa_gwdt would reach timeout since no one touch it during system suspend. To solve this, just test WDOG_HW_RUNNING bit in suspend and disable the sbsa_gwdt if the bit is set, then reopen it accordingly in resume process. Signed-off-by:
Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Guenter Roeck authored
Use devm_add_action_or_reset() to disable the watchdog when the driver is removed to simplify the code. With this in place, we can use devm_watchdog_register_device() to register the watchdog, and the removal function is no longer necessary. Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Guenter Roeck authored
The devm_clk_get[_optional]_enabled() helpers: - call devm_clk_get[_optional]() - call clk_prepare_enable() and register what is needed in order to call clk_disable_unprepare() when needed, as a managed resource. This simplifies the code and avoids the calls to clk_disable_unprepare(). While at it, use dev_err_probe consistently, and use its return value to return the error code. Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: -
Guenter Roeck authored
The use of WDOG_HW_RUNNING is currently inconsistent: If set by the driver, it will remain set until the watchdog device is opened and then closed. If set by the watchdog core, it is only set if the watchdog can not be stopped when closed. Subsequenty it is always only set while the watchdog is closed and the hardware watchdog is running. This is both misleading and inconsistent: The API states that watchdog_hw_running() indicates that the hardware watchdog is running. This is currently not always the case. Set WDOG_HW_RUNNING whenever a watchdog is successfully started for consistent behavior and to accurately report its status. This means that we no longer have to check for both watchdog_active() and watchdog_hw_running() to check if the watchdog is running because watchdog_hw_running() now implies watchdog_active(). Simplify the code accordingly where warranted. Cc: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Guenter Roeck authored
0-day complains: drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c:442:22: sparse: symbol 'imx_wdt' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c:446:22: sparse: symbol 'imx_wdt_legacy' was not declared. Should it be static? Declare as static variables. Fixes: e42c73f1 ("watchdog: imx2_wdg: suspend watchdog in WAIT mode") Cc: Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@norik.com> Signed-off-by:
-
