- 13 Apr, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Heiner Kallweit authored
Fix the name of the aoclk81 clock. Apparently name aoclk81 as used by the vendor driver was changed when mainlining the g12a clock driver. Fixes: f41efceb ("pwm: meson: Add clock source configuration for Meson G12A") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by:
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
-
Heiner Kallweit authored
This fix is basically the same as 9bce02ef ("pwm: meson: Fix the G12A AO clock parents order"). Vendor driver referenced there has xtal as first parent also for axg ao. In addition fix the name of the aoclk81 clock. Apparently name aoclk81 as used by the vendor driver was changed when mainlining the axg clock driver. Fixes: bccaa3f9 ("pwm: meson: Add clock source configuration for Meson-AXG") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
- 06 Apr, 2023 10 commits
-
-
Olivier Moysan authored
The PWM capture assumes that the input selector is set to default input and that the slave mode is disabled. Force reset state for TISEL and SMCR registers to match this requirement. Note that slave mode disabling is not a pre-requisite by itself for capture mode, as hardware supports it for PWM capture. However, the current implementation of the driver does not allow slave mode for PWM capture. Setting slave mode for PWM capture results in wrong capture values. Signed-off-by:
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com> Acked-by:
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Sasha Finkelstein authored
Add the MAINTAINERS entries for the driver Signed-off-by:
Sasha Finkelstein <fnkl.kernel@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev> Signed-off-by:
-
Sasha Finkelstein authored
Adds the Apple PWM controller driver. Signed-off-by:
-
Sasha Finkelstein authored
Apple SoCs such as the M1 contain a PWM controller used among other things to control the keyboard backlight. Signed-off-by:
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Acked-by:
-
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno authored
The DISP_PWM controller's default behavior is to always use register double buffering: all reads/writes are then performed on shadow registers instead of working registers and this becomes an issue in case our chosen configuration in Linux is different from the default (or from the one that was pre-applied by the bootloader). An example of broken behavior is when the controller is configured to use shadow registers, but this driver wants to configure it otherwise: what happens is that the .get_state() callback is called right after registering the pwmchip and checks whether the PWM is enabled by reading the DISP_PWM_EN register; At this point, if shadow registers are enabled but their content was not committed before booting Linux, we are *not* reading the current PWM enablement status, leading to the kernel knowing that the hardware is actually enabled when, in reality, it's not. The aforementioned issue emerged since this driver was fixed with commit 0b5ef342 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Fix the parameters calculated by the enabled flag of disp_pwm") making it to read the enablement status from the right register. Configure the controller in the .get_state() callback to avoid this desync issue and get the backlight properly working again. Fixes: 3f2b1673 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .get_state()") Signed-off-by:
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Reviewed-by:
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> Tested-by:
Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> Tested-by:
-
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno authored
If shadow registers usage is not desired, disable that before performing any write to CON0/1 registers in the .apply() callback, otherwise we may lose clkdiv or period/width updates. Fixes: cd4b45ac ("pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support") Signed-off-by:
-
Krzysztof Kozlowski authored
The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI matching via PRP0001, even though it might not be relevant here). This also fixes the following compile error: drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c:245:34: error: ‘stm32_pwm_lp_of_match’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=] for builds with CONFIG_OF=n, CONFIG_PWM_STM32_LP=y and W=1. Signed-off-by:
-
Krzysztof Kozlowski authored
The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI matching via PRP0001, even though it might not be relevant here). This also fixes the following compiler warning: drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c:252:34: error: ‘rcar_pwm_of_table’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=] for builds with CONFIG_OF=n, CONFIG_PWM_RCAR=y and W=1. Signed-off-by:
-
Heiner Kallweit authored
Convert Amlogic Meson PWM binding to yaml. Reviewed-by:
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Golle authored
Since commit 241eab76 ("pwm: mediatek: Add support for MT7986") support for the 2 PWM channels implemented in MediaTek MT7986 SoCs has been added. Also add the compatible string to dt-bindings now that they have been converted to YAML. Acked-by:
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Reviewed-by:
-
- 30 Mar, 2023 28 commits
-
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Signed-off-by:
-
