- 31 Dec, 2011 40 commits
-
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
There's no need to initialize unused fields with zero, as Kernel does it automatically. Removing the initialization makes the code cleaner. This also allows the removal of the unused pll_set callback. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
This parameter is passed as NULL, and it is never used. Just remove it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
This driver only uses the DVBv5 struct. All it needs is to remove the non-used params var, and to add the ISDB-T to the delivery systems. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
dib9000 is almost ok, with regards to the usage of DVBv5 parameters. It has just a few stuff using the old way, at set_frontend. Replace them by the DVBv5 way, and add the delivery system. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
There's no need to initialize with zero. This only wastes space at the data segment. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
cx24123_pll_writereg doesn't use dvb_frontend_parameters. Just remove it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
This is one of the first drivers using DVBv5. It relies only on DVBv5 way, but still it contains some stub for unused methods. Remove them, add the delivery system and do some trivial cleanups. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using dvb_frontend_parameters struct, that were designed for a subset of the supported standards, use the DVBv5 cache information. Also, fill the supported delivery systems at dvb_frontend_ops struct. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
This is one of the cases where the frontend changes is required: while this device lies to applications that it is a DVB-T, it is, in fact, a frontend for CTTB delivery system. So, the information provided for a DVBv3 application should be different than the one provided to a DVBv5 application. So, fill delsys with the CTTB delivery system, and use the new way. there aren't many changes here, as everything on this driver is on auto mode, probably because of the lack of a proper API for this delivery system. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Creates a DVBv5 get_frontend call, renaming the DVBv3 one to get_frontend_legacy(), while not all frontends are converted. After the conversion for all drivers, get_frontend_legacy() will be removed. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Passing DVBv3 parameters to set_frontend is not fun, as the core doesn't have any way to know if the driver is using the v3 or v5 parameters. So, rename the callback and add a new one to allow distinguish between a mixed v3/v5 paramenter call from a pure v5 call. After having all frontends to use the new way, the legacy call can be removed. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
The dvb were originally written for DVB-T/C/S and ATSC. So, the original frontend struct has fields to describe only those three standards. While 2nd gen standards are similar to these, new standards like DSS, ISDB and CTTB don't fit on any of the above types. While there's a way for the drivers to explicitly change whatever default DELSYS were filled inside the core, still a fake value is needed there, and a "compat" code to allow DVBv3 applications to work with those delivery systems is needed. This is good for a short term solution, while applications aren't using DVBv5 directly. However, at long term, this is bad, as the compat code runs even if the application is using DVBv5. Also, the compat code is not perfect, and only works when the frontend is capable of auto-detecting the parameters that aren't visible by the faked delivery systems. So, let the frontend fill the supported delivery systems at the device properties directly. The future plan is that the drivers will stop filling ops->info.type, filling, instead, ops->delsys. This will allow multi-frontend devices like drx-k to use just one frontend structure for all supported delivery systems. Of course, the core will keep using it, in order to keep allowing DVBv3 calls. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
This is a big patch, yet trivial: now that all tuners use the DVBv5 way to pass parameters (e. g. via fe->dtv_property_cache), the extra parameter can be removed from set_params() call. After this change, very few DVBv3 specific stuff are left at the tuners. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
The calc_regs() callback is used by a few frontends (mt352, nxt200x, digitv and zl10353). On all places it is called, the parameters are set by DVBv5 way. So, just use the DVBv5 struct and remove the extra parameter. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Despite its name, tuner-simple has a complex logic to set freqs ;) Basically, it can be called by two different ways: via set_params() or via calc_regs() callbacks. Both are bound to the DVBv3 API. Also, set_params internally calls calc_regs(). In order to get rid of DVBv3 params at set_params(), it shouldn't call calc_regs() anymore. The code duplication is very small, as most of the code there is just to check for invalid parameters. With regards to calc_regs(), it should still trust on bandwidth and frequency parameters passed via DVBv3, until a later patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to set the tuner Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
-