If the user has requested an override of the min_perf_pct via
sysfs, then it should be restored whenever policy is updated,
such as on resume.  Take the max of whatever the user requested
and whatever the policy is.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When thermal or other subsystem requests to change the policy,
use that irrepective of whether cpufreq policy is PERFORMANCE or
not. Without this change, when thermal subsystem passive policy wants
to reduce performance, it still runs at 100%.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add a sysfs interface to display the total number of supported
pstates.  This value is independent of whether turbo has been
enabled or disabled.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch adds "turbo_pct" to the intel_pstate sysfs interface.
turbo_pct will display the percentage of the total supported
pstates that are in the turbo range.  This value is independent
of whether turbo has been disabled or not.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add SKL cpuid.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is no possibility of any race on updating last_index, trans_table or
total_trans as these are updated only by cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans() which
will be called sequentially.

The only place where locking is still relevant is: cpufreq_stats_update(), which
updates time_in_state and last_time. This can be called by two thread in
parallel, that may result in races.

The two threads being:
- sysfs read of time_in_state
- and frequency transition that calls cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans().

Remove locking from the first case mentioned above.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We need to call cpufreq_stats_update() to update 'time_in_state' for the last
frequency. This is achieved by calling it from cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(),
which is called after frequency transition.

But if we detect that the cpu's frequency haven't really changed and its a false
POSTCHANGE notification, we don't really need to update time_in_state.

It wouldn't cause any harm in calling cpufreq_stats_update() but we can avoid
calling it here and call it when the frequency really changes. The result will
be the same but more efficient.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_stats_update() updates time_in_state and nothing else. It should ideally
be updated only in two cases:
- User requested for the current value of time_in_state.
- We have switched states and so need to update time for the last state.

Currently, we are also doing this while user asks for the transition table of
frequencies. It wouldn't do any harm, but no good as well. Its useless here.

Remove it.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'time_in_state' can't be NULL if 'stats' is valid. These are allocated together
and only if time_in_state is allocated successfully, we update policy->stats.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Userspace is free to read value of any file from cpufreq/stats directory once
they are created. __cpufreq_stats_create_table() is creating the sysfs files
first and then allocating resources for them. Though it would be quite difficult
to trigger the racy situation here, but for the sake of keeping sensible code
lets create sysfs entries only after we are ready to go.

This also does some makeup to the routine to make it look better.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU notifications were used only from cpufreq-stats which
doesn't use it anymore. Remove them.

This also decrements values of other notification macros defined after
CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU by 1 to remove gaps. Hopefully all users are using
macro's instead of direct numbers and so they wouldn't break as macro values are
changed now.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'cpu' field of struct cpufreq_stats isn't used anymore and so can be dropped.
This change makes cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu() empty and so that is removed
as well.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'last_cpu' was used only from cpufreq-stats and isn't used anymore. Get rid of
it.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently we name objects of 'struct cpufreq_stats' as 'stat' and 'stats'.
Use 'stats' to make it consistent.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

All CPUs sharing a cpufreq policy share stats too. For this reason,
add a stats pointer to struct cpufreq_policy and drop per-CPU variable
cpufreq_stats_table used for accessing cpufreq stats so as to reduce
code complexity.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It is better to pass a struct cpufreq_stats pointer to cpufreq_stats_update()
instead of a CPU number, because that's all it needs.

Even if we pass a cpu number to cpufreq_stats_update(), it reads the per-cpu
variable to get 'stats' out of it. So we are doing these operations
unnecessarily:
- First getting the cpu number to pass to cpufreq_stats_update(), stat->cpu.
- And then getting stats from the cpu, per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu).
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

While we allocate stats, we do need to check if freq-table is present
or not as we need to use it then. But while freeing stats, all we need
to know is if stats holds a valid pointer value. There is no use of
testing if cpufreq table is present or not.

Don't check it.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'cur_time' is defined in the first line and is then assigned a value
in the next line. Initialize it while defining it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It was never used, but is there since the first commit. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

__cpufreq_stats_create_table() is called from:

- cpufreq notifier on creation of a new policy. Stats will always be
  NULL here.
- cpufreq_stats_init() for all CPUs as cpufreq-stats might have been
  initialized after cpufreq driver. For any policy, 'stats' will be
  NULL for the first CPU only and will be valid for all other CPUs
  managed by the same policy.

While we return for other CPUs, we don't return the right error value.
It's not that we would fail with -EBUSY. But generally, this is what
these return values mean:
- EBUSY: we are busy right now, try again. And the retry attempt might
  be immediate.
- EEXIST: We already have what you are trying to create and there is no
  need to create it again, and so no more tries are required.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The MODULE_DESCRIPTION() string is just too long and then is broken into
multiple lines just to make checkpatch happy.

Rewrite it to make it more precise.
Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We need to initialize completion and work only on policy allocation and not
really on the policy restore side and so we better move this piece of code to
cpufreq_policy_alloc().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

CPUFREQ_STICKY flag is set by drivers which don't want to get unregistered
even if cpufreq-core isn't able to initialize policy for any CPU.

When this flag isn't set, we try to unregister the driver. To find out
which CPUs are registered and which are not, we try to check per_cpu
cpufreq_cpu_data for all CPUs. Because we have a list of valid policies
available now, we better check if the list is empty or not instead of
the 'for' loop. That will be much more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

These variables are just used within adjust_jiffies() and so must be
local to it. Also there is no need of a dummy routine for CONFIG_SMP
case as we can take care of all that with help of macros in the same
routine. It doesn't look that ugly.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We just need to check if a 'policy' is already present for the cpu we are
adding. We don't need to take all the locks and do kobject usage updates. Use
the light-weight cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() routine instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is no need of this separate variable, use 'policy' instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

These are messing up more than the benefit they provide. It isn't
a lot of code anyway, that we will compile without them.

Kill them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We should first check if a cpufreq driver is already registered or not
before updating driver_data->flags.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is no point finding out the 'policy' again within __cpufreq_get()
when all the callers already have it. Just make them pass policy instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is no point finding out the 'policy' again within cpufreq_out_of_sync()
when all the callers already have it. Just make them pass policy instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Either we can be setpolicy or target type, nothing else. And so the
else part of setpolicy will automatically be of has_target() type.
And so we don't need to check it again.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Remove unnecessary from find_governor's name.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There are two 'if' blocks here, checking for !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy and
has_target(). Both are actually doing the same thing, merge them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

No need of an unnecessary line break.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We can live without it and so we should.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It doesn't make any sense at all and is a leftover of some earlier commit.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We should stop cpufreq governors when we shut down the system.  If we
don't do this, we can end up with this deadlock:

1. cpufreq governor may be running on a CPU other than CPU0.
2. In machine_restart() we call smp_send_stop() which stops CPUs.
   If one of these CPUs was actively running a cpufreq governor
   then it may have the mutex / spinlock needed to access the main
   PMIC in the system (perhaps over I2C)
3. If a machine needs access to the main PMIC in order to shutdown
   then it will never get it since the mutex was lost when the other
   CPU stopped.
4. We'll hang (possibly eventually hitting the hard lockup detector).

Let's avoid the problem by stopping the cpufreq governor at shutdown,
which is a sensible thing to do anyway.
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be
populated by the driver core.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Pull ARM SoC fixes from Olof Johansson:
 "We've been sitting on our fixes branch for a while, so this batch is
  unfortunately on the large side.

  A lot of these are tweaks and fixes to device trees, fixing various
  bugs around clocks, reg ranges, etc.  There's also a few defconfig
  updates (which are on the late side, no more of those).

  All in all the diffstat is bigger than ideal at this time, but nothing
  in here seems particularly risky"

* tag 'armsoc-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc: (31 commits)
  reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization
  ARM: dts: disable CCI on exynos5420 based arndale-octa
  drivers: bus: check cci device tree node status
  ARM: rockchip: disable jtag/sdmmc autoswitching on rk3288
  ARM: nomadik: fix up leftover device tree pins
  ARM: at91: board-dt-sama5: add phy_fixup to override NAND_Tree
  ARM: at91/dt: sam9263: Add missing clocks to lcdc node
  ARM: at91: sama5d3: dt: correct the sound route
  ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix the timer reg length
  ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable LM90 driver
  ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support
  arm: dts: Use pmu_system_controller phandle for dp phy
  ARM: shmobile: sh73a0 legacy: Set .control_parent for all irqpin instances
  ARM: dts: berlin: correct BG2Q's SM GPIO location.
  ARM: dts: berlin: add broken-cd and set bus width for eMMC in Marvell DMP DT
  ARM: dts: berlin: fix io clk and add missing core clk for BG2Q sdhci2 host
  ARM: dts: Revert disabling of smc91x for n900
  ARM: dts: imx51-babbage: Fix ULPI PHY reset modelling
  ARM: dts: dra7-evm: fix qspi device tree partition size
  ARM: omap2plus_defconfig: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
  ...