- 29 Jun, 2021 40 commits
-
-
Rafael Aquini authored
On non-preemptible kernel builds the watchdog can complain about soft lockups when vfree() is called against large vmalloc areas: [ 210.851798] kvmalloc-test: vmalloc(2199023255552) succeeded [ 238.654842] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#181 stuck for 26s! [rmmod:5203] [ 238.662716] Modules linked in: kvmalloc_test(OE-) ... [ 238.772671] CPU: 181 PID: 5203 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G S OE 5.13.0-rc7+ #1 [ 238.781413] Hardware name: Intel Corporation PURLEY/PURLEY, BIOS PLYXCRB1.86B.0553.D01.1809190614 09/19/2018 [ 238.792383] RIP: 0010:free_unref_page+0x52/0x60 [ 238.797447] Code: 48 c1 fd 06 48 89 ee e8 9c d0 ff ff 84 c0 74 19 9c 41 5c fa 48 89 ee 48 89 df e8 b9 ea ff ff 41 f7 c4 00 02 00 00 74 01 fb 5b <5d> 41 5c c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f0 29 77 [ 238.818406] RSP: 0018:ffffb4d87868fe98 EFLAGS: 00000206 [ 238.824236] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000001da0c945 RCX: ffffb4d87868fe40 [ 238.832200] RDX: ffffd79d3beed108 RSI: ffffd7998501dc08 RDI: ffff9c6fbffd7010 [ 238.840166] RBP: 000000000d518cbd R08: ffffd7998501dc08 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 238.848131] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffd79d3beee088 R12: 0000000000000202 [ 238.856095] R13: ffff9e5be3eceec0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 238.864059] FS: 00007fe082c2d740(0000) GS:ffff9f4c69b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 238.873089] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 238.879503] CR2: 000055a000611128 CR3: 000000f6094f6006 CR4: 00000000007706e0 [ 238.887467] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 238.895433] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 238.903397] PKRU: 55555554 [ 238.906417] Call Trace: [ 238.909149] __vunmap+0x17c/0x220 [ 238.912851] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13a/0x250 [ 238.918008] ? syscall_trace_enter.isra.20+0x13c/0x1b0 [ 238.923746] do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80 [ 238.927740] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Like in other range zapping routines that iterate over a large list, lets just add cond_resched() within __vunmap()'s page-releasing loop in order to avoid the watchdog splats. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210622225030.478384-1-aquini@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Uladzislau Rezki authored
Currently for order-0 pages we use a bulk-page allocator to get set of pages. From the other hand not allocating all pages is something that might occur. In that case we should fallbak to the single-page allocator trying to get missing pages, because it is more permissive(direct reclaim, etc). Introduce a vm_area_alloc_pages() function where the described logic is implemented. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521130718.GA17882@pc638.lanSigned-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
A checkpatch.pl script complains on splitting a text across lines. It is because if a user wants to find an entire string he or she will not succeeded. <snip> WARNING: quoted string split across lines + "vmalloc size %lu allocation failure: " + "page order %u allocation failed", total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 10 lines checked <snip> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521204359.19943-1-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
When a memory allocation for array of pages are not succeed emit a warning message as a first step and then perform the further cleanup. The reason it should be done in a right order is the clean up function which is free_vm_area() can potentially also follow its error paths what can lead to confusion what was broken first. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210516202056.2120-4-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
Recently there has been introduced a page bulk allocator for users which need to get number of pages per one call request. For order-0 pages switch to an alloc_pages_bulk_array_node() instead of alloc_pages_node(), the reason is the former is not capable of allocating set of pages, thus a one call is per one page. Second, according to my tests the bulk allocator uses less cycles even for scenarios when only one page is requested. Running the "perf" on same test case shows below difference: <default> - 45.18% __vmalloc_node - __vmalloc_node_range - 35.60% __alloc_pages - get_page_from_freelist 3.36% __list_del_entry_valid 3.00% check_preemption_disabled 1.42% prep_new_page <default> <patch> - 31.00% __vmalloc_node - __vmalloc_node_range - 14.48% __alloc_pages_bulk 3.22% __list_del_entry_valid - 0.83% __alloc_pages get_page_from_freelist <patch> The "test_vmalloc.sh" also shows performance improvements: fix_size_alloc_test_4MB loops: 1000000 avg: 89105095 usec fix_size_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 513672 usec full_fit_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 748900 usec long_busy_list_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 8043038 usec random_size_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 4028582 usec fix_align_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 1457671 usec fix_size_alloc_test_4MB loops: 1000000 avg: 62083711 usec fix_size_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 449207 usec full_fit_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 735985 usec long_busy_list_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 5176052 usec random_size_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 2589252 usec fix_align_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 1365009 usec For example 4MB allocations illustrates ~30% gain, all the rest is also better. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210516202056.2120-3-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
Patch series "vmalloc() vs bulk allocator", v2. This patch (of 3): Add a "node" variant of the alloc_pages_bulk_array() function. The helper guarantees that a __alloc_pages_bulk() is invoked with a valid NUMA node ID. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210516202056.2120-1-urezki@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210516202056.2120-2-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vincent Whitchurch authored
Some trace event formats print PFNs as hex while others print them as decimal. This is rather annoying when attempting to grep through traces to understand what's going on with a particular page. $ git grep -ho 'pfn=[0x%lu]\+' include/trace/events/ | sort | uniq -c 11 pfn=0x%lx 12 pfn=%lu 2 pfn=%lx Printing as hex is in the majority in the trace events, and all the normal printks in mm/ also print PFNs as hex, so change all the PFN formats in the trace events to use 0x%lx. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210602092608.1493-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.comSigned-off-by:Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
YueHaibing authored
Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO() helper instead of plain DEVICE_ATTR(), which makes the code a bit shorter and easier to read. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210524112852.34716-1-yuehaibing@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Souptick Joarder authored
Kernel test robot throws below warning -> >> arch/h8300/kernel/setup.c:72:26: warning: Unused variable: region [unusedVariable] struct memblock_region *region; Fixed it by removing unused variable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210602185431.11416-1-jrdr.linux@gmail.comSigned-off-by:Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Reported-by:
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by:
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by:
-
Chen Li authored
1. These tlb flush functions have been using vma instead mm long time ago, but there is still some comments use mm as parameter. 2. the actual struct we use is vm_area_struct instead of vma_struct. 3. remove unused flush_kern_tlb_page. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87k0oaq311.wl-chenli@uniontech.comSigned-off-by:
Chen Li <chenli@uniontech.com> Acked-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
vma_lookup() finds the vma of a specific address with a cleaner interface and is more readable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-23-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-22-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-21-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-20-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-19-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-18-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-17-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-16-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
vma_lookup() finds the vma of a specific address with a cleaner interface and is more readable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-15-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-14-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-13-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
vma_lookup() finds the vma of a specific address with a cleaner interface and is more readable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-12-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
vma_lookup() finds the vma of a specific address with a cleaner interface and is more readable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-11-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-10-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-9-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-8-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Using vma_lookup() removes the requirement to check if the address is within the returned vma. The code is easier to understand and more compact. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-7-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
vma_lookup() finds the vma of a specific address with a cleaner interface and is more readable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-6-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
vma_lookup() finds the vma of a specific address with a cleaner interface and is more readable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-5-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Use vma_lookup() to find the VMA at a specific address. As vma_lookup() will return NULL if the address is not within any VMA, the start address no longer needs to be validated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-4-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
vma_lookup() will look up the vma at a specific address. find_vma() will start the search for a specific address and continue upwards. This fixes an issue with the selftest as the returned vma may not be the newly created vma, but simply the vma at a higher address. objects Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-3-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com Fixes: 6fedafac (drm/i915/selftests: Wrap vm_mmap() around GEM Signed-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Patch series "mm: Add vma_lookup()", v2. Many places in the kernel use find_vma() to get a vma and then check the start address of the vma to ensure the next vma was not returned. Other places use the find_vma_intersection() call with add, addr + 1 as the range; looking for just the vma at a specific address. The third use of find_vma() is by developers who do not know that the function starts searching at the provided address upwards for the next vma. This results in a bug that is often overlooked for a long time. Adding the new vma_lookup() function will allow for cleaner code by removing the find_vma() calls which check limits, making find_vma_intersection() calls of a single address to be shorter, and potentially reduce the incorrect uses of find_vma(). This patch (of 22): Many places in the kernel use find_vma() to get a vma and then check the start address of the vma to ensure the next vma was not returned. Other places use the find_vma_intersection() call with add, addr + 1 as the range; looking for just the vma at a specific address. The third use of find_vma() is by developers who do not know that the function starts searching at the provided address upwards for the next vma. This results in a bug that is often overlooked for a long time. Adding the new vma_lookup() function will allow for cleaner code by removing the find_vma() calls which check limits, making find_vma_intersection() calls of a single address to be shorter, and potentially reduce the incorrect uses of find_vma(). Also change find_vma_intersection() comments and declaration to be of the correct length and add kernel documentation style comment. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-1-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210521174745.2219620-2-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liu Xiang authored
Fix the return value in comment of finish_mkwrite_fault(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210513093931.15234-1-liu.xiang@zlingsmart.comSigned-off-by:
Liu Xiang <liu.xiang@zlingsmart.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Using find_vma_intersection() avoids the need for a temporary variable and makes the code cleaner. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210511014328.2902782-1-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Liam Howlett authored
Both __do_munmap() and exit_mmap() unlock a range of VMAs using almost identical code blocks. Replace both blocks by a static inline function. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak code layout] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510211021.2797427-1-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Gonzalo Matias Juarez Tello authored
Logic of find_vma_intersection() is repeated in __do_munmap(). Also, prev is assigned a value before checking vma->vm_start >= end which might end up on a return statement making that assignment useless. Calling find_vma_intersection() checks that condition and returns NULL if no vma is found, hence only the !vma check is needed in __do_munmap(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409162129.18313-1-gmjuareztello@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Gonzalo Matias Juarez Tello <gmjuareztello@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's also remove masking off MAP_EXECUTABLE from ksys_mmap_pgoff(): the last in-tree occurrence of MAP_EXECUTABLE is now in LEGACY_MAP_MASK, which accepts the flag e.g., for MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE; however, the flag is ignored throughout the kernel now. Add a comment to LEGACY_MAP_MASK stating that MAP_EXECUTABLE is ignored. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210421093453.6904-4-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Reviewed-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kevin Brodsky <Kevin.Brodsky@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Ever since commit e9714acf ("mm: kill vma flag VM_EXECUTABLE and mm->num_exe_file_vmas"), VM_EXECUTABLE is gone and MAP_EXECUTABLE is essentially completely ignored. Let's remove all usage of MAP_EXECUTABLE. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix blooper in fs/binfmt_aout.c. per David] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210421093453.6904-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Patch series "perf/binfmt/mm: remove in-tree usage of MAP_EXECUTABLE". Stumbling over the history of MAP_EXECUTABLE, I noticed that we still have some in-tree users that we can get rid of. This patch (of 3): Before commit e9714acf ("mm: kill vma flag VM_EXECUTABLE and mm->num_exe_file_vmas"), VM_EXECUTABLE indicated MAP_EXECUTABLE. MAP_EXECUTABLE is nowadays essentially ignored by the kernel and does not relate to VM_MAYEXEC. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210421093453.6904-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210421093453.6904-2-david@redhat.com Fixes: f972eb63 ("perf: Pass protection and flags bits through mmap2 interface") Signed-off-by:
-
Huilong Deng authored
Macros should not use a trailing semicolon. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210614091530.22117-1-denghuilong@cdjrlc.comSigned-off-by:
Huilong Deng <denghuilong@cdjrlc.com> Reviewed-by:
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by:
-
