1. 13 Oct, 2020 1 commit
  2. 06 Oct, 2020 1 commit
  3. 02 Oct, 2020 1 commit
    • Jann Horn's avatar
      objtool: Permit __kasan_check_{read,write} under UACCESS · b0b8e56b
      Jann Horn authored
      Building linux-next with JUMP_LABEL=n and KASAN=y, I got this objtool
      warning:
      
      arch/x86/lib/copy_mc.o: warning: objtool: copy_mc_to_user()+0x22: call to
      __kasan_check_read() with UACCESS enabled
      
      What happens here is that copy_mc_to_user() branches on a static key in a
      UACCESS region:
      
              __uaccess_begin();
              if (static_branch_unlikely(&copy_mc_fragile_key))
                      ret = copy_mc_fragile(to, from, len);
              ret = copy_mc_generic(to, from, len);
              __uaccess_end();
      
      and the !CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL version of static_branch_unlikely() uses
      static_key_enabled(), which uses static_key_count(), which uses
      atomic_read(), which calls instrument_atomic_read(), which uses
      kasan_check_read(), which is __kasan_check_read().
      
      Let's permit these KASAN helpers in UACCESS regions - static keys should
      probably work under UACCESS, I think.
      
      PeterZ adds:
      
        It's not a matter of permitting, it's a matter of being safe and
        correct. In this case it is, because it's a thin wrapper around
        check_memory_region() which was already marked safe.
      
        check_memory_region() is correct because the only thing it ends up
        calling is kasa_report() and that is also marked safe because that is
        annotated with user_access_save/restore() before it does anything else.
      
        On top of that, all of KASAN is noinstr, so nothing in here will end up
        in tracing and/or call schedule() before the user_access_save().
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      b0b8e56b
  4. 21 Sep, 2020 2 commits
  5. 18 Sep, 2020 2 commits
  6. 10 Sep, 2020 10 commits
  7. 01 Sep, 2020 22 commits
  8. 30 Aug, 2020 1 commit