- 05 Dec, 2022 40 commits
-
-
Anand Jain authored
There is a repeating code section in the parent function after calling btrfs_alloc_device(), as below: name = rcu_string_strdup(path, GFP_...); if (!name) { btrfs_free_device(device); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); } rcu_assign_pointer(device->name, name); Except in add_missing_dev() for obvious reasons. This patch consolidates that repeating code into the btrfs_alloc_device() itself so that the parent function doesn't have to duplicate code. This consolidation also helps to review issues regarding RCU lock violation with device->name. Parent function device_list_add() and add_missing_dev() use GFP_NOFS for the allocation, whereas the rest of the parent functions use GFP_KERNEL, so bring the NOFS allocation context using memalloc_nofs_save() in the function device_list_add() and add_missing_dev() is already doing it. Signed-off-by:Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The input buffers passed down to compression must never be changed, switch type to u8 as it's a raw byte buffer and use const. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since all the recovery paths have been migrated to the new error bitmap based system, we can remove the old stripe number based system. This cleanup involves one behavior change: - Rebuild rbio can no longer be merged Previously a rebuild rbio (caused by retry after data csum mismatch) can be merged, if the error happens in the same stripe. But with the new error bitmap based solution, it's much harder to compare error bitmaps. So here we just don't merge rebuild rbio at all. This may introduce some performance impact at extreme corner cases, but we're willing to take it. Other than that, this patch will cleanup the following members: - rbio::faila - rbio::failb They will be replaced by per-vertical stripe check, which is more accurate. - rbio::error It will be replace by per-vertical stripe error bitmap check. - Allow get_rbio_vertical_errors() to accept NULL pointers for @faila and @failb Some call sites only want to check if we have errors beyond the tolerance. Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since we have rbio::error_bitmap to indicate exactly where the errors are (including read error and csum mismatch error), we can make recovery path more accurate. For example: 0 32K 64K Data 1 |XXXXXXXX| | Data 2 | |XXXXXXXXX| Parity | | | 1) Get csum mismatch when reading data 1 [0, 32K) 2) Mark corresponding range error The old code will mark the whole data 1 stripe as error. While the new code will only mark data 1 [0, 32K) as error. 3) Recovery path The old code will recover data 1 [0, 64K), all using Data 2 and parity. This means, Data 1 [32K, 64K) will be corrupted data, as data 2 [32K, 64K) is already corrupted. While the new code will only recover data 1 [0, 32K), as only that range has error so far. This new behavior can avoid populating rbio cache with incorrect data. Signed-off-by: -
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently btrfs raid56 uses btrfs_raid_bio::faila and failb to indicate which stripe(s) had IO errors. But that has some problems: - If one sector failed csum check, the whole stripe where the corruption is will be marked error. This can reduce the chance we do recover, like this: 0 4K 8K Data 1 |XX| | Data 2 | |XX| Parity | | | In above case, 0~4K in data 1 should be recovered using data 2 and parity, while 4K~8K in data 2 should be recovered using data 1 and parity. Currently if we trigger read on 0~4K of data 1, we will also recover 4K~8K of data 1 using corrupted data 2 and parity, causing wrong result in rbio cache. - Harder to expand for future M-N scheme As we're limited to just faila/b, two corruptions. - Harder to expand to handle extra csum errors This can be problematic if we start to do csum verification. This patch will introduce an extra @error_bitmap, where one bit represents error that happened for that sector. The choice to introduce a new error bitmap other than reusing sector_ptr, is to avoid extra search between rbio::stripe_sectors[] and rbio::bio_sectors[]. Since we can submit bio using sectors from both sectors, doing proper search on both array will more complex. Although the new bitmap will take extra memory, later we can remove things like @error and faila/b to save some memory. Currently the new error bitmap and failab mechanism coexists, the error bitmap is only updated at endio time and recover entrance. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is mostly using internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is mostly using internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The async_chunk::inode structure is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The extent_io_tree::private_data was meant to be a preparatory work for the metadata inode rework but that never materialized. Now it's used only for an inode so it's better to change the appropriate type and rename it. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
All callers except one pass NULL, so the parameter can be dropped and the inode::io_tree initialization can be open coded. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The btrfs_writepage_fixup structure is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The btrfs_dio_private structure is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
