- 29 Apr, 2019 40 commits
-
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function always uses the btree inode's io_tree. Stop taking the tree as a function argument and instead access it internally from read_extent_buffer_pages. No functional changes. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The only possible 'private_data' that is passed to this function is actually an inode. Make that explicit by changing the signature of the call back. No functional changes. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
There is no need to use a typedef to define the type of the function and then use that to define the respective member in extent_io_ops. Define struct's member directly. No functional changes. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Though the transaction is also availabe, it's not guaranteed to be non-NULL. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
It used to be called from only two places (truncate path and releasing a transaction handle), but commits 28bad212 ("btrfs: fix truncate throttling") and db2462a6 ("btrfs: don't run delayed refs in the end transaction logic") removed their calls to this function, so it's not used anymore. Just remove it and all its helpers. Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Previous patch made sure that btrfs_setxattr_trans() is called only when transaction NULL. Clean up btrfs_setxattr_trans() and drop the parameter. Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
When the caller has already created the transaction handle, btrfs_setxattr() will use it. Also adds assert in btrfs_setxattr(). Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_setxattr_trans() is called by 5 functions as below and all of them do updates. None of them would be roun on a read-only root. So its ok to remove the readonly root check here as it's a high-level conditon. 1. __btrfs_set_acl() btrfs_init_acl() btrfs_init_inode_security() 2. __btrfs_set_acl() btrfs_set_acl() 3. btrfs_set_prop() btrfs_set_prop_trans() / \ btrfs_ioctl_setflags() btrfs_xattr_handler_set_prop() 4. btrfs_xattr_handler_set() 5. btrfs_initxattrs() btrfs_xattr_security_init() btrfs_init_inode_security() Signed-off-by: -
Anand Jain authored
Preparatory patch, as we are going split the calls with and without transaction to use the respective btrfs_setxattr() and btrfs_setxattr_trans() functions. Export btrfs_setxattr() for calls outside of xattr.c. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
When trans is not NULL btrfs_setxattr() calls do_setxattr() directly with a check for readonly root. Rename do_setxattr() btrfs_setxattr() in preparation to call do_setxattr() directly instead. Preparatory patch, no functional changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Rename btrfs_setxattr() to btrfs_setxattr_trans(), so that do_setxattr() can be renamed to btrfs_setxattr(). Preparatory patch, no functional changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Unlike btrfs_tree_lock() and btrfs_tree_read_lock(), the remaining functions in locking.c will not sleep, thus doesn't make much sense to record their execution time. Those events are introduced mainly for user space tool to audit and detect lock leakage or dead lock. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There are two tree lock events which can sleep: - btrfs_tree_read_lock() - btrfs_tree_lock() Sometimes we may need to look into the concurrency picture of the fs. For that case, we need the execution time of above two functions and the owner of @eb. Here we introduce a trace events for user space tools like bcc, to get the execution time of above two functions, and get detailed owner info where eBPF code can't. All the overhead is hidden behind the trace events, so if events are not enabled, there is no overhead. These trace events also output bytenr and generation, allow them to be pared with unlock events to pin down deadlock. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The member num_dirty_bgs of struct btrfs_transaction is not used anymore, it is set and incremented but nothing reads its value anymore. Its last read use was removed by commit 64403612 ("btrfs: rework btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs"). So just remove that member. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
Nikolay Borisov authored
Ordered csums are keyed off of a btrfs_ordered_extent, which already has a reference to the inode. This implies that an explicit inode argument is redundant. So remove it. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There are at least 2 reports about a memory bit flip sneaking into on-disk data. Currently we only have a relaxed check triggered at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() time, as it's not mandatory and only for CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY enabled build, it doesn't help users to detect such problem. This patch will address the hole by triggering comprehensive check on tree blocks before writing it back to disk. The design points are: - Timing of the check: Tree block write hook This timing is chosen to reduce the overhead. The comprehensive check should be as expensive as a checksum calculation. Doing full check at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() is too expensive for end user. - Loose empty leaf check Originally for an empty leaf, tree-checker will report error if it's not a tree root. The problem for such check at write time is: * False alert for tree root created in current transaction In that case, the commit root still needs to be written to disk. And since current root can differ from commit root, then it will cause false alert. This happens for log tree. * False alert for relocated tree block Relocated tree block can be written to disk due to memory pressure, in that case an empty csum tree root can be written to disk and cause false alert, since csum root node hasn't been updated. Previous patch of removing comprehensive empty leaf owner check has paved the way for this patch. The example error output will be something like: BTRFS critical (device dm-3): corrupt leaf: root=2 block=1350630375424 slot=68, bad key order, prev (10510212874240 169 0) current (1714119868416 169 0) BTRFS error (device dm-3): block=1350630375424 write time tree block corruption detected BTRFS: error (device dm-3) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2220: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while writing out transaction) BTRFS info (device dm-3): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device dm-3): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device dm-3) in cleanup_transaction:1839: errno=-5 IO failure BTRFS info (device dm-3): delayed_refs has NO entry Reported-by:Leonard Lausen <leonard@lausen.nl> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Commit 1ba98d08 ("Btrfs: detect corruption when non-root leaf has zero item") introduced comprehensive root owner checker. However it's pretty expensive tree search to locate the owner root, especially when it get reused by mandatory read and write time tree-checker. This patch will remove that check, and completely rely on owner based empty leaf check, which is much faster and still works fine for most case. And since we skip the old root owner check, now write time tree check can be merged with btrfs_check_leaf_full(). Signed-off-by:
-
