Joanne Koong says:

====================

This patchset is the 2nd in the dynptr series. The 1st can be found here [0].

This patchset adds skb and xdp type dynptrs, which have two main benefits for
packet parsing:
    * allowing operations on sizes that are not statically known at
      compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses).
    * more ergonomic and less brittle iteration through data (eg does not need
      manual if checking for being within bounds of data_end)

When comparing the differences in runtime for packet parsing without dynptrs
vs. with dynptrs, there is no noticeable difference. Patch 9 contains more
details as well as examples of how to use skb and xdp dynptrs.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
---
Changelog:

v12 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230226085120.3907863-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v12 -> v13:
    * Fix missing { } for case statement

v11 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230222060747.2562549-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v11 -> v12:
    * Change constant mem size checking to use "__szk" kfunc annotation
      for slices
    * Use autoloading for success selftests

v10 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230216225524.1192789-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v10 -> v11:
    * Reject bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() for non-writable progs at load time
      instead of runtime
    * Add additional patch (__uninit kfunc annotation)
    * Expand on documentation
    * Add bpf_dynptr_write() calls for persisting writes in tests

v9 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230127191703.3864860-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v9 -> v10:
    * Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr interface
    * Add some more tests
    * Split up patchset into more parts to make it easier to review

v8 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230126233439.3739120-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v8 -> v9:
    * Fix dynptr_get_type() to check non-stack dynptrs

v7 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221021011510.1890852-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v7 -> v8:
    * Change helpers to kfuncs
    * Add 2 new patches (1/5 and 2/5)

v6 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220907183129.745846-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v6 -> v7
    * Change bpf_dynptr_data() to return read-only data slices if the skb prog
      is read-only (Martin)
    * Add test "skb_invalid_write" to test that writes to rd-only data slices
      are rejected

v5 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220831183224.3754305-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v5 -> v6
    * Address kernel test robot errors by static inlining

v4 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220822235649.2218031-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v4 -> v5
    * Address kernel test robot errors for configs w/out CONFIG_NET set
    * For data slices, return PTR_TO_MEM instead of PTR_TO_PACKET (Kumar)
    * Split selftests into subtests (Andrii)
    * Remove insn patching. Use rdonly and rdwr protos for dynptr skb
      construction (Andrii)
    * bpf_dynptr_data() returns NULL for rd-only dynptrs. There will be a
      separate bpf_dynptr_data_rdonly() added later (Andrii and Kumar)

v3 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220822193442.657638-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v3 -> v4
    * Forgot to commit --amend the kernel test robot error fixups

v2 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220811230501.2632393-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v2 -> v3
    * Fix kernel test robot build test errors

v1 = https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220726184706.954822-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v1 -> v2
  * Return data slices to rd-only skb dynptrs (Martin)
  * bpf_dynptr_write allows writes to frags for skb dynptrs, but always
    invalidates associated data slices (Martin)
  * Use switch casing instead of ifs (Andrii)
  * Use 0xFD for experimental kind number in the selftest (Zvi)
  * Put selftest conversions w/ dynptrs into new files (Alexei)
  * Add new selftest "test_cls_redirect_dynptr.c"
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Test skb and xdp dynptr functionality in the following ways:

1) progs/test_cls_redirect_dynptr.c
   * Rewrite "progs/test_cls_redirect.c" test to use dynptrs to parse
     skb data

   * This is a great example of how dynptrs can be used to simplify a
     lot of the parsing logic for non-statically known values.

     When measuring the user + system time between the original version
     vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
     "time ./test_progs -t cls_redirect"):
         original version: 0.092 sec
         with dynptrs: 0.078 sec

2) progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
   * Rewrite "progs/test_xdp.c" test to use dynptrs to parse xdp data

     When measuring the user + system time between the original version
     vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
     "time ./test_progs -t xdp_attach"):
         original version: 0.118 sec
         with dynptrs: 0.094 sec

3) progs/test_l4lb_noinline_dynptr.c
   * Rewrite "progs/test_l4lb_noinline.c" test to use dynptrs to parse
     skb data

     When measuring the user + system time between the original version
     vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
     "time ./test_progs -t l4lb_all"):
         original version: 0.062 sec
         with dynptrs: 0.081 sec

     For number of processed verifier instructions:
         original version: 6268 insns
         with dynptrs: 2588 insns

4) progs/test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt_dynptr.c
   * Add sample code for parsing tcp hdr opt lookup using dynptrs.
     This logic is lifted from a real-world use case of packet parsing
     in katran [0], a layer 4 load balancer. The original version
     "progs/test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt.c" (not using dynptrs) is included
     here as well, for comparison.

     When measuring the user + system time between the original version
     vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
     "time ./test_progs -t parse_tcp_hdr_opt"):
         original version: 0.031 sec
         with dynptrs: 0.045 sec

5) progs/dynptr_success.c
   * Add test case "test_skb_readonly" for testing attempts at writes
     on a prog type with read-only skb ctx.
   * Add "test_dynptr_skb_data" for testing that bpf_dynptr_data isn't
     supported for skb progs.

6) progs/dynptr_fail.c
   * Add test cases "skb_invalid_data_slice{1,2,3,4}" and
     "xdp_invalid_data_slice{1,2}" for testing that helpers that modify the
     underlying packet buffer automatically invalidate the associated
     data slice.
   * Add test cases "skb_invalid_ctx" and "xdp_invalid_ctx" for testing
     that prog types that do not support bpf_dynptr_from_skb/xdp don't
     have access to the API.
   * Add test case "dynptr_slice_var_len{1,2}" for testing that
     variable-sized len can't be passed in to bpf_dynptr_slice
   * Add test case "skb_invalid_slice_write" for testing that writes to a
     read-only data slice are rejected by the verifier.
   * Add test case "data_slice_out_of_bounds_skb" for testing that
     writes to an area outside the slice are rejected.
   * Add test case "invalid_slice_rdwr_rdonly" for testing that prog
     types that don't allow writes to packet data don't accept any calls
     to bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr.

[0] https://github.com/facebookincubator/katran/blob/main/katran/lib/bpf/pckt_parsing.hSigned-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-11-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Two new kfuncs are added, bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr.
The user must pass in a buffer to store the contents of the data slice
if a direct pointer to the data cannot be obtained.

For skb and xdp type dynptrs, these two APIs are the only way to obtain
a data slice. However, for other types of dynptrs, there is no
difference between bpf_dynptr_slice(_rdwr) and bpf_dynptr_data.

For skb type dynptrs, the data is copied into the user provided buffer
if any of the data is not in the linear portion of the skb. For xdp type
dynptrs, the data is copied into the user provided buffer if the data is
between xdp frags.

If the skb is cloned and a call to bpf_dynptr_data_rdwr is made, then
the skb will be uncloned (see bpf_unclone_prologue()).

Please note that any bpf_dynptr_write() automatically invalidates any prior
data slices of the skb dynptr. This is because the skb may be cloned or
may need to pull its paged buffer into the head. As such, any
bpf_dynptr_write() will automatically have its prior data slices
invalidated, even if the write is to data in the skb head of an uncloned
skb. Please note as well that any other helper calls that change the
underlying packet buffer (eg bpf_skb_pull_data()) invalidates any data
slices of the skb dynptr as well, for the same reasons.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-10-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add xdp dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points
to a xdp_buff. The dynptr acts on xdp data. xdp dynptrs have two main
benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not
statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses).
Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of
through direct access of xdp->data and xdp->data_end) can be more
ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for
being within bounds of data_end).

For reads and writes on the dynptr, this includes reading/writing
from/to and across fragments. Data slices through the bpf_dynptr_data
API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and
bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() should be used.

For examples of how xdp dynptrs can be used, please see the attached
selftests.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-9-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add skb dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points
to a skb. The dynptr acts on skb data. skb dynptrs have two main
benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not
statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses).
Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of
through direct access of skb->data and skb->data_end) can be more
ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for
being within bounds of data_end).

For bpf prog types that don't support writes on skb data, the dynptr is
read-only (bpf_dynptr_write() will return an error)

For reads and writes through the bpf_dynptr_read() and bpf_dynptr_write()
interfaces, reading and writing from/to data in the head as well as from/to
non-linear paged buffers is supported. Data slices through the
bpf_dynptr_data API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and
bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() (added in subsequent commit) should be used.

For examples of how skb dynptrs can be used, please see the attached
selftests.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-8-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This patch adds __uninit as a kfunc annotation.

This will be useful for scenarios such as for example in dynptrs,
indicating whether the dynptr should be checked by the verifier as an
initialized or an uninitialized dynptr.

Without this annotation, the alternative would be needing to hard-code
in the verifier the specific kfunc to indicate that arg should be
treated as an uninitialized arg.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-7-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This commit refactors the logic for determining which register in a
function is the dynptr into "get_dynptr_arg_reg". This will be used
in the future when the dynptr reg for BPF_FUNC_dynptr_write will need
to be obtained in order to support writes for skb dynptrs.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-6-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Some bpf dynptr functions will be called from places where
if CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not set, then the dynptr function is
undefined. For example, when skb type dynptrs are added in the
next commit, dynptr functions are called from net/core/filter.c

This patch defines no-op implementations of these dynptr functions
so that they do not break compilation by being an undefined reference.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-5-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This change allows kfuncs to take in an uninitialized dynptr as a
parameter. Before this change, only helper functions could successfully
use uninitialized dynptrs. This change moves the memory access check
(including stack state growing and slot marking) into
process_dynptr_func(), which both helpers and kfuncs call into.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-4-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This change cleans up process_dynptr_func's flow to be more intuitive
and updates some comments with more context.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-3-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The bpf mirror of the in-kernel sk_buff and xdp_buff data structures are
__sk_buff and xdp_md. Currently, when we pass in the program ctx to a
kfunc where the program ctx is a skb or xdp buffer, we reject the
program if the in-kernel definition is sk_buff/xdp_buff instead of
__sk_buff/xdp_md.

This change allows "sk_buff <--> __sk_buff" and "xdp_buff <--> xdp_md"
to be recognized as valid matches. The user program may pass in their
program ctx as a __sk_buff or xdp_md, and the in-kernel definition
of the kfunc may define this arg as a sk_buff or xdp_buff.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-2-joannelkoong@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

[Changes from V4:
- s/regs:16/regs:8 in figure.]

[Changes from V3:
- Back to src_reg and dst_reg, since they denote register numbers
  as opposed to the values stored in these registers.]

[Changes from V2:
- Use src and dst consistently in the document.
- Use a more graphical depiction of the 128-bit instruction.
- Remove `Where:' fragment.
- Clarify that unused bits are reserved and shall be zeroed.]

[Changes from V1:
- Use rst literal blocks for figures.
- Avoid using | in the basic instruction/pseudo instruction figure.
- Rebased to today's bpf-next master branch.]

This patch modifies instruction-set.rst so it documents the encoding
of BPF instructions in terms of how the bytes are stored (be it in an
ELF file or as bytes in a memory buffer to be loaded into the kernel
or some other BPF consumer) as opposed to how the instruction looks
like once loaded.

This is hopefully easier to understand by implementors looking to
generate and/or consume bytes conforming BPF instructions.

The patch also clarifies that the unused bytes in a pseudo-instruction
shall be cleared with zeros.
Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h6v6i0da.fsf_-_@oracle.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

In commit 332ea1f6 ("bpf: Add bpf_cgroup_from_id() kfunc"), a new
bpf_cgroup_from_id() kfunc was added which allows a BPF program to
lookup and acquire a reference to a cgroup from a cgroup id. The
commit's doxygen comment seems to have copy-pasted fields, which causes
BPF kfunc helper documentation to fail to render:

<snip>/helpers.c:2114: warning: Excess function parameter 'cgrp'...
<snip>/helpers.c:2114: warning: Excess function parameter 'level'...

<snip>

<snip>/helpers.c:2114: warning: Excess function parameter 'level'...

This patch fixes the doxygen header.

Fixes: 332ea1f6 ("bpf: Add bpf_cgroup_from_id() kfunc")
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228152845.294695-1-void@manifault.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

For R4000 erratas around multiplication and division instructions,
as our use of those instructions are always followed by mflo/mfhi
instructions, the only issue we need care is

"MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0" Errata 28:
"A double-word or a variable shift may give an incorrect result if
executed while an integer multiplication is in progress."

We just emit a mfhi $0 to ensure the operation is completed after
every multiplication instruction according to workaround suggestion
in the document.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230228113305.83751-3-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com

For DADDI errata we just workaround by disable immediate operation
for BPF_ADD / BPF_SUB to avoid generation of DADDIU.

All other use cases in JIT won't cause overflow thus they are all safe.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230228113305.83751-2-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com

Commit 04d58f1b("libbpf: add API to get XDP/XSK supported features")
added feature_flags to struct bpf_xdp_query_opts. If a user uses
bpf_xdp_query_opts with feature_flags member, the bpf_xdp_query()
will check whether 'netdev' family exists or not in the kernel.
If it does not exist, the bpf_xdp_query() will return -ENOENT.

But 'netdev' family does not exist in old kernels as it is
introduced in the same patch set as Commit 04d58f1b.
So old kernel with newer libbpf won't work properly with
bpf_xdp_query() api call.

To fix this issue, if the return value of
libbpf_netlink_resolve_genl_family_id() is -ENOENT, bpf_xdp_query()
will just return 0, skipping the rest of xdp feature query.
This preserves backward compatibility.

Fixes: 04d58f1b ("libbpf: add API to get XDP/XSK supported features")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230227224943.1153459-1-yhs@fb.com

Replace the short informal description with the proper doc comments.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230220234958.764997-1-iii@linux.ibm.com

The syscall register definitions for ARM in bpf_tracing.h doesn't define
the fifth parameter for the syscalls. Because of this some KPROBES based
selftests fail to compile for ARM architecture.

Define the fifth parameter that is passed in the R5 register (uregs[4]).

Fixes: 3a95c42d ("libbpf: Define arm syscall regs spec in bpf_tracing.h")
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230223095346.10129-1-puranjay12@gmail.com

Commit bc292ab0("mm: introduce vma->vm_flags wrapper functions")
turns the vm_flags into a const variable.

Added bpf_find_vma test in commit f108662b("selftests/bpf: Add tests
for bpf_find_vma") to assign values to variables that declare const in
find_vma_fail1.c programs, which is an error to the compiler and does not
test BPF verifiers. It is better to replace 'const vm_flags_t vm_flags'
with 'unsigned long vm_start' for testing.

    $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ -j8
    ...
    progs/find_vma_fail1.c:16:16: error: cannot assign to non-static data
    member 'vm_flags' with const-qualified type 'const vm_flags_t' (aka
    'const unsigned long')
            vma->vm_flags |= 0x55;
            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
    ../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/vmlinux.h:1898:20:
    note: non-static data member 'vm_flags' declared const here
                    const vm_flags_t vm_flags;
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~`~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/tencent_CB281722B3C1BD504C16CDE586CACC2BE706@qq.com

RFC8259 ("The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange
Format") only specifies \", \\, \/, \b, \f, \n, \r, and \r as valid
two-character escape sequences. This does not include \', which is not
required in JSON because it exclusively uses double quotes as string
separators.

Solidus (/) may be escaped, but does not have to. Only reverse
solidus (\), double quotes ("), and the control characters have to be
escaped. Therefore, with this fix, bpftool correctly supports all valid
two-character escape sequences (but still does not support characters
that require multi-character escape sequences).

Witout this fix, attempting to load a JSON file generated by bpftool
using Python 3.10.6's default json.load() may fail with the error
"Invalid \escape" if the file contains the invalid escaped single
quote (\').

Fixes: b66e907c ("tools: bpftool: copy JSON writer from iproute2 repository")
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <gerhorst@cs.fau.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230227150853.16863-1-gerhorst@cs.fau.de

After commit 80d7da1c ("asm-generic: Drop getrlimit and setrlimit
syscalls from default list"), new architectures won't need to include
getrlimit and setrlimit, they are superseded with prlimit64.

In order to maintain compatibility for the new architectures, such as
LoongArch which does not define __NR_getrlimit, it is better to use
__NR_prlimit64 instead of __NR_getrlimit in user_ringbuf test to fix
the following build error:

    TEST-OBJ [test_progs] user_ringbuf.test.o
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c: In function 'kick_kernel_cb':
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c:593:17: error: '__NR_getrlimit' undeclared (first use in this function)
    593 |         syscall(__NR_getrlimit);
        |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c:593:17: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
  make: *** [Makefile:573: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/user_ringbuf.test.o] Error 1
  make: Leaving directory 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1677235015-21717-4-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn

LoongArch provides struct user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs
to userspace, use struct user_pt_regs to define __PT_REGS_CAST()
to fix the following build error:

     CLNG-BPF [test_maps] loop1.bpf.o
  progs/loop1.c:22:9: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct pt_regs'
                                  m = PT_REGS_RC(ctx);
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_tracing.h:493:41: note: expanded from macro 'PT_REGS_RC'
  #define PT_REGS_RC(x) (__PT_REGS_CAST(x)->__PT_RC_REG)
                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helper_defs.h:20:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct pt_regs'
  struct pt_regs;
         ^
  1 error generated.
  make: *** [Makefile:572: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/loop1.bpf.o] Error 1
  make: Leaving directory 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1677235015-21717-2-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn

Hangbin Liu says:

====================

As Martin suggested, let's move the SYS() macro to test_progs.h since
a lot of programs are using it. After that, let's run mptcp in a dedicated
netns to avoid user config influence.

v3: fix fd redirect typo. Move SYS() macro into the test_progs.h
v2: remove unneed close_cgroup_fd goto label.
====================
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

The current mptcp test is run in init netns. If the user or default
system config disabled mptcp, the test will fail. Let's run the mptcp
test in a dedicated netns to avoid none kernel default mptcp setting.
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230224061343.506571-3-liuhangbin@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

A lot of tests defined SYS() macro to run system calls with goto label.
Let's move this macro to test_progs.h and add configurable
"goto_label" as the first arg.
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230224061343.506571-2-liuhangbin@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Add a test case for bpf_cgroup_from_id.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y/bBlt+tPozcQgws@slm.duckdns.orgSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

cgroup ID is an userspace-visible 64bit value uniquely identifying a given
cgroup. As the IDs are used widely, it's useful to be able to look up the
matching cgroups. Add bpf_cgroup_from_id().

v2: Separate out selftest into its own patch as suggested by Alexei.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y/bBaG96t0/gQl9/@slm.duckdns.orgSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Document the discussion from the email thread on the IETF bpf list,
where it was explained that the raw format varies by endianness
of the processor.
Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230220223742.1347-1-dthaler1968@googlemail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Kernel's flow dissector continues to parse the packet when
the (optional) IPv6 flow label is empty even when instructed
to stop (via BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_STOP_AT_FLOW_LABEL). Do
the same in our reference BPF reimplementation.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221180518.2139026-1-sdf@google.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This patch adds kernel function call support for RV64. Since the offset
from RV64 kernel and module functions to bpf programs is almost within
the range of s32, the current infrastructure of RV64 is already
sufficient for kfunc, so let's turn it on.
Suggested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221140656.3480496-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The condition src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL && imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call
may be satisfied by a kfunc call. This would lead to unnecessarily
setting has_tail_call. Use src_reg == 0 instead.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230220163756.753713-1-iii@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The current implementation already allow such mixing.
Let's enable it in JIT.
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230218105317.4139666-1-hengqi.chen@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

I cross-compile my BPF selftests with the following command:

CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS="--target=aarch64-linux-gnu --sysroot=/sysroot/" \
  make LLVM=1 CC=clang CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- SRCARCH=arm64

(Note the use of CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS to specify a custom sysroot instead
of letting clang use gcc's default sysroot)

However, CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS gets propagated to host tools builds (libbpf
and bpftool) and because they reference it directly in their Makefiles,
they end up cross-compiling host objects which results in linking
errors.

This patch ensures that CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS is reset if CROSS_COMPILE
isn't set (for example when reaching a BPF host tool build).
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230217151832.27784-1-revest@chromium.orgSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The following three uapi headers:

    tools/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/bpf_perf_event.h
    tools/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/bpf_perf_event.h
    tools/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h

were introduced in commit 618e165b ("selftests/bpf: sync kernel headers
and introduce arch support in Makefile"), they are not used any more after
commit 720f228e ("bpf: fix broken BPF selftest build"), so remove them.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1676533861-27508-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cnSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The size of bpf_cpumask is fixed, so there is no need to allocate many
bpf_mem_caches for bpf_cpumask_ma, just one bpf_mem_cache is enough.
Also add comments for bpf_mem_alloc_init() in bpf_mem_alloc.h to prevent
future miuse.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230216024821.2202916-1-houtao@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Typically, verifier should use env->allow_ptr_leaks when invaliding
registers for users that don't have CAP_PERFMON or CAP_SYS_ADMIN to
avoid leaking the pointer value. This is similar in spirit to
c67cae55 ("bpf: Tighten ptr_to_btf_id checks."). In a lot of the
existing checks, we know the capabilities are present, hence we don't do
the check.

Instead of being inconsistent in the application of the check, wrap the
action of invalidating a register into a helper named 'mark_invalid_reg'
and use it in a uniform fashion to replace open coded invalidation
operations, so that the check is always made regardless of the call site
and we don't have to remember whether it needs to be done or not for
each case.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221200646.2500777-7-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The current code does type matching for the case where reg->type is
PTR_TO_BTF_ID or has the PTR_TRUSTED flag. However, this only needs to
occur for non-MEM_ALLOC and non-MEM_PERCPU cases, but will include both
as per the current code.

The MEM_ALLOC case with or without PTR_TRUSTED needs to be handled
specially by the code for type_is_alloc case, while MEM_PERCPU case must
be ignored. Hence, to restore correct behavior and for clarity,
explicitly list out the handled PTR_TO_BTF_ID types which should be
handled for each case using a switch statement.

Helpers currently only take:
	PTR_TO_BTF_ID
	PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED
	PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU
	PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC
	PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU
	PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED

This fix was also described (for the MEM_ALLOC case) in [0].

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221121160657.h6z7xuvedybp5y7s@apolloSigned-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221200646.2500777-6-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The plan is to supposedly tag everything with PTR_TRUSTED eventually,
however those changes should bring in their respective code, instead
of leaving it around right now. It is arguable whether PTR_TRUSTED is
required for all types, when it's only use case is making PTR_TO_BTF_ID
a bit stronger, while all other types are trusted by default.

Hence, just drop the two instances which do not occur in the verifier
for now to avoid reader confusion.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221200646.2500777-5-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

There are a few cases where hlist_node is checked to be unhashed without
holding the lock protecting its modification. In this case, one must use
hlist_unhashed_lockless to avoid load tearing and KCSAN reports. Fix
this by using lockless variant in places not protected by the lock.

Since this is not prompted by any actual KCSAN reports but only from
code review, I have not included a fixes tag.

Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221200646.2500777-4-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Eduard Zingerman says:

====================

This patch-set modifies BPF verifier to accept programs that read from
uninitialized stack locations, but only if executed in privileged mode.
This provides significant verification performance gains: 30% to 70% less
processed states for big number of test programs.

The reason for performance gains comes from treating STACK_MISC and
STACK_INVALID as compatible, when cached state is compared to current state
in verifier.c:stacksafe().

The change should not affect safety, because any value read from STACK_MISC
location has full binary range (e.g. 0x00-0xff for byte-sized reads).

Details and measurements are provided in the description for the patch #1.

The change was suggested by Andrii Nakryiko, the initial patch was created
by Alexei Starovoitov. The discussion could be found at [1].

Changes v1 -> v2 (v1 available at [2]):
- Calls to helper functions now convert STACK_INVALID to STACK_MISC
  (suggested by Andrii);
- The test case progs/test_global_func10.c is updated to expect new
  error message. Before recent commit [3] exact content of error
  messages was not verified for this test.
- Replaced incorrect '//'-style comments in test case asm blocks by
  '/*...*/'-style comments in order to fix compilation issues;
- Changed the tag from "Suggested-By" to "Co-developed-by" for Alexei
  on patch #1, please let me know if this is appropriate use of the tag.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQKs2i1iuZ5SUGuJtxWVfGYR9kDgYKhq3rNV+kBLQCu7rA@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230216183606.2483834-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[3] 95ebb376 ("selftests/bpf: Convert test_global_funcs test to test_loader framework")
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>