The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-22-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
sysfs_create_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-21-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-20-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-19-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-18-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-17-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-16-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-15-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-14-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-13-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-12-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-11-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-10-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-9-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-8-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>