In order to avoid the R/O remount, we acquired ->s_umount lock during
we deleted the dead snapshots and subvolumes. But it is unnecessary,
because we have cleaner_mutex.

We use cleaner_mutex to protect the process of the dead snapshots/subvolumes
deletion. And when we remount the fs to be R/O, we also acquire this mutex to
do cleanup after we change the status of the fs. That is this lock can serialize
the above operations, the cleaner can be aware of the status of the fs, and if
the cleaner is deleting the dead snapshots/subvolumes, the remount task will
wait for it. So it is safe to remove ->s_umount in cleaner_kthread().

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() already checks if btrfs_root_refs()
is zero and returns ENOENT in this case. There is no need to do
it again in six places.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

No need to check for NULL in send.c and disk-io.c.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We don't need to copy it back to user side as it remains unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Clean up the format of the definitions of BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 and
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Philipp <philipp.andreas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

sctx is removed from the argument of the function that
doesn't use sctx.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The size parameter to btrfs_extend_item() is the number of bytes
to add to the item, not the size of the item after the operation
(like it is for btrfs_truncate_item(), there the size parameter
is not the number of bytes to take away, but the total size of
the item after truncation).
Fix it in the comment.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion waits until the currently running qgroup
operation completes. It returns immediately when no rescan process is in
progress. This is useful to automate things around the rescan process (e.g.
testing).
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

When doing qgroup accounting, we call ulist_alloc()/ulist_free() every time
when we want to walk qgroup tree.

By introducing 'qgroup_ulist', we only need to call ulist_alloc()/ulist_free()
once. This reduce some sys time to allocate memory, see the measurements below

fsstress -p 4 -n 10000 -d $dir

With this patch:

real    0m50.153s
user    0m0.081s
sys     0m6.294s

real    0m51.113s
user    0m0.092s
sys     0m6.220s

real    0m52.610s
user    0m0.096s
sys     0m6.125s	avg 6.213
-----------------------------------------------------
Without the patch:

real    0m54.825s
user    0m0.061s
sys     0m10.665s

real    1m6.401s
user    0m0.089s
sys     0m11.218s

real    1m13.768s
user    0m0.087s
sys     0m10.665s       avg 10.849

we can see the sys time reduce ~43%.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We want to know if there are debugging features compiled in, this may
affect performance. The message is printed before the sanity checks.
Also kill version.h file that serves no purpose, we don't use any
version tag for kernel module.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

And change the message level to KERN_INFO.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The 'end' value must exactly cover the end of the interval, which means
one byte less than the expected block alignment, or in case of a file
smaller than one block, one byte less than the inode size.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Code checked for raid 5 flag in two else-if branches, so code would never be reached. Probably a copy-paste bug.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Nordvik <henrikno@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Dave reported a panic because the extent_root->commit_root was NULL in the
caching kthread.  That is because we just unset it in free_root_pointers, which
is not the correct thing to do, we have to either wait for the caching kthread
to complete or hold the extent_commit_sem lock so we know the thread has exited.
This patch makes the kthreads all stop first and then we do our cleanup.  This
should fix the race.  Thanks,
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Commit be283b2e
(    Btrfs: use helper to cleanup tree roots) introduced the following bug,

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000034
 IP: [<ffffffffa039368c>] extent_buffer_get+0x4/0xa [btrfs]
[...]
 Pid: 2463, comm: btrfs-cache-1 Tainted: G           O 3.9.0+ #4 innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa039368c>]  [<ffffffffa039368c>] extent_buffer_get+0x4/0xa [btrfs]
 Process btrfs-cache-1 (pid: 2463, threadinfo ffff880112d60000, task ffff880117679730)
[...]
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffffa0398a99>] btrfs_search_slot+0x104/0x64d [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa039aea4>] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0xa7/0x334 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa039b141>] btrfs_next_leaf+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa039ea13>] caching_thread+0x1a3/0x2e0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03d8811>] worker_loop+0x14b/0x48e [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03d86c6>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x25c/0x25c [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81068d3d>] kthread+0x8d/0x95
  [<ffffffff81068cb0>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43
  [<ffffffff8151e5ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81068cb0>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43
RIP  [<ffffffffa039368c>] extent_buffer_get+0x4/0xa [btrfs]

We've free'ed commit_root before actually getting to free block groups where
caching thread needs valid extent_root->commit_root.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Dave reported a NULL pointer deref.  This is caused because he thought he'd be
smart and add sanity checks to the extent_io bit operations, but he didn't
expect a tree to have a NULL mapping.  To fix this we just need to init the
relocation's processed_blocks with the btree_inode->i_mapping.  Thanks,
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

There is a path where btrfs_drop_inode() is called with its inode's root
is NULL: In btrfs_new_inode(), when btrfs_set_inode_index() fails,
iput() is called. We should handle this case before taking look at the
root->root_item.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We get a use after free if we had a transaction to cleanup since there could be
delayed inodes which refer to their respective fs_root.  Thanks
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Btrfs has been pointer tagging bi_private and using bi_bdev
to store the stripe index and mirror number of failed IOs.

As bios bubble back up through the call chain, we use these
to decide if and how to retry our IOs.  They are also used
to count IO failures on a per device basis.

Recently a bio tracepoint was added lead to crashes because
we were abusing bi_bdev.

This commit adds a btrfs bioset, and creates explicit fields
for the mirror number and stripe index.  The plan is to
extend this structure for all of the fields currently in
struct btrfs_bio, which will mean one less kmalloc in
our IO path.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

If we fail to load the chunk tree we'll call free_root_pointers, except we may
not have assigned the roots for the dev_root/extent_root/csum_root yet, so we
could NULL pointer deref at this point.  Just add checks to make sure these
roots are set to keep us from panicing.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The quota_tree was set up to use the empty_block_rsv before
which would be problematic when the filesystem is filled up
and ENOSPC happens during internal operations while the quota
tree is updated and COWed (when the btrfs_qgroup_info_item
items) are written. In fact, use_block_rsv() which is used
in btrfs_cow_block() falls back to the global_block_rsv in
this case. But just in order to make it more clear what is
happening, change it to explicitly use the global_block_rsv.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

end_bio_extent_readpage computes whole_page based on bv_offset and
bv_len, without taking into account that blk_update_request may modify
them when some of the blocks to be read into a page produce a read
error.  This would cause the read to unlock only part of the file
range associated with the page, which would in turn leave the entire
page locked, which would not only keep the process blocked instead of
returning -EIO to it, but also prevent any further access to the file.

It turns out that btrfs always issues whole-page reads and writes.
The special handling of non-whole_page appears to be a mistake or a
left-over from a time when this wasn't the case.  Indeed,
end_bio_extent_writepage distinguished between whole_page and
non-whole_page writes but behaved identically in both cases!

I've replaced the whole_page computations with warnings, just to be
sure that we're not issuing partial page reads or writes.  The
warnings should probably just go away some time.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

btrfs_invalidate_inodes() may sleep, so we should not invoke it in the
spin lock context. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We have checked if ->node is NULL or not, so it is unnecessary to
use BUG_ON() to check again. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The root node of the rb-tree may be changed, so we should get it under
the lock. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

inode_tree_del() will move the tree root into the dead root list, and
then the tree will be destroyed by the cleaner. So if we remove the
delayed node which is cached in the inode after inode_tree_del(),
we may access a freed tree root. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We need to set return value explicitly, otherwise we'll lose the error
value.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Before applying this patch, we reserved the space for the global reserve
by the minimum unit if we found it is empty, it was unreasonable and
inefficient, because if the global reserve space was depleted, it implied
that the size of the global reserve was too small. In this case, we shoud
update the global reserve and fill it.

Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

If the type of the space we need is different with the global reserve, we
can not steal the space from the global reserve, because we can not allocate
the space from the free space cache that the global reserve points to.

Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

It is very likely that there are lots of subvolumes/snapshots in the filesystem,
so if we use global block reservation to do inode cache truncation, we may hog
all the free space that is reserved in global rsv. So it is better that we do
the free space reservation for inode cache truncation by ourselves.

Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The filesystem with inode cache was forced to be read-only when we umounted it.

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f ${DEV}
 # mount -o inode_cache ${DEV} ${MNT}
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=${MNT}/file1 bs=1M count=8192
 # btrfs fi syn ${MNT}
 # dd if=${MNT}/file1 of=/dev/null bs=1M
 # rm -f ${MNT}/file1
 # btrfs fi syn ${MNT}
 # umount ${MNT}

It is because there was no enough space to do inode cache truncation, and then
we aborted the current transaction.

But no space error is not a serious problem when we write out the inode cache,
and it is safe that we just skip this step if we meet this problem. So we need
not abort the current transaction.
Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Raid5 with 3 devices is well defined while the old logic allowed
raid5 only with a minimum of 4 devices when converting the block group
profile via btrfs balance. Creating a raid5 with just three devices
using mkfs.btrfs worked always as expected. This is now fixed and the
whole logic is rewritten.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Philipp <philipp.andreas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

In replace_path(), if read_tree_block() fails, we cannot return
directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise memory
leak happens.

Similar to Wang's "Btrfs: fix possible memory leak in the
find_parent_nodes()" patch, the current commit fixes an issue that
is related to the "Btrfs: fix all callers of read_tree_block"
commit.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

In the find_parent_nodes(), if read_tree_block() fails, we can
not return directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise
memory leak happens.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

This is not yet supported and causes crashes. One sad user reported
that it destroyed his filesystem.

One failure is in __btrfs_map_block+0xc1f calling kmalloc(0).

0x5f21f is in __btrfs_map_block (fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4923).
4918                            num_stripes = map->num_stripes;
4919                            max_errors = nr_parity_stripes(map);
4920
4921                            raid_map = kmalloc(sizeof(u64) * num_stripes,
4922                                               GFP_NOFS);
4923                            if (!raid_map) {
4924                                    ret = -ENOMEM;
4925                                    goto out;
4926                            }
4927

There might be more issues. Until this is really tested, don't allow
users to start the procedure on RAID5/RAID6 filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>