- 12 Jan, 2011 40 commits
-
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is present for the given device. That information is only used by acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(). Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0, so it really should be void. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Before evaluating _PRW for devices that are reported as inactive or not present by their _STA control methods we should check if those methods are actually present (otherwise the evaulation of _PRW will obviously fail and a scary message will be printed unnecessarily). Reported-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Reported-by: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
It certainly is not a good idea to execute _ON or _OFF and _STA for the same power resource at the same time which may happen in some circumstances in theory. To prevent that from happening, read the power state of each power resource under its mutex, as that will prevent the state from being changed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Rename acpi_power_off_device() to acpi_power_off() in analogy with acpi_power_on(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Len Brown authored
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Since acpi_bus_set_power() should not use __acpi_bus_get_power() to update the device's device->power.state field before changing its power state (this may cause device->power.state to be inconsistent with the device power resources' reference counters), remove this call from it. In consequence, the acpi_power_nocheck variable is not necessary any more, so it can be dropped along with the DMI table used for setting that variable for HP Pavilion 05. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
There are no more users of acpi_bus_get_power(), so it can be dropped. Moreover, it should be dropped, because it modifies the device->power.state field of an ACPI device without updating the reference counters of the device's power resources, which is wrong. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in acpi_fujitsu_add() and acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_add(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reported-and-Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power() for manipulating power resources used by ACPI fan devices, which allows them to be put into the right state during initialization and resume. Consequently, remove the flags.force_power_state field from struct acpi_device, which is not necessary any more. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Depending on the organization of the ACPI namespace, power resource device objects may generally be scanned after the "regular" device objects that they are referred from through _PRn. This, in turn, may cause acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to attempt to access them through acpi_bus_init_power() before they are registered (and initialized by acpi_power_driver). [This is not a theoretical issue, it actually happens for one PnP device on my testbed HP nx6325.] To fix this problem, make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() attempt to register power resource devices as soon as they have been found in the _PRn output for any other devices. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
The ACPI device driver used for handling power resources, acpi_power_driver, creates a struct acpi_power_resource object for each ACPI device representing a power resource. These objects are then used when setting and reading the power states of devices using the corresponding power resources. Unfortunately, acpi_power_driver is registered after acpi_scan_init() that may add devices using the power resources before acpi_power_driver has a chance to create struct acpi_power_resource objects for them (specifically, the power resources may be referred to during the scanning process through acpi_bus_get_power() before they have been initialized). As the first step towards fixing this issue, move the registration of acpi_power_driver into acpi_scan_init() so that power resource devices can be initialized by it as soon as they have been found in the namespace. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Add function acpi_bus_update_power() for reading the actual power state of an ACPI device and updating its device->power.state field in such a way that its power resources' reference counters will remain consistent with that field. For this purpose introduce __acpi_bus_set_power() setting the power state of an ACPI device without updating its device->power.state field and make acpi_bus_set_power() and acpi_bus_update_power() use it (acpi_bus_set_power() retains the current behavior for now). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Add function acpi_bus_init_power() for getting the initial power state of an ACPI device and reference counting its power resources as appropriate. Make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() use the new function instead of acpi_bus_get_power() that updates device->power.state without reference counting the device's power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
It sometimes is necessary to get the power state of an ACPI device without updating its device->power.state field, for example to avoid inconsistencies between device->power.state and the reference counters of the device's power resources. For this purpose introduce __acpi_bus_get_power() that will return the given device's power state via a pointer (instead of modifying device->power.state) and make acpi_bus_get_power() use it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
Introduce function acpi_power_on_resources() that reference counts and possibly turns on ACPI power resources for a given device and a given power state of it. This function will be used for reference counting device power resources during initialization. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Rafael J. Wysocki authored
acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should not update device->power.state behind the back of its caller, so make it return the state via a pointer instead. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
Version 20101209. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
Modify/add some comments to minimize ACPICA/linux GPE code divergence. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
The global event handler is called whenever a general purpose or fixed ACPI event occurs. Also update Linux OSL to collect events counter with global event handler. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
This feature provides an automatic device notification for wake devices when a wakeup GPE occurs and there is no corresponding GPE method or handler. Rather than ignoring such a GPE, an implicit AML Notify operation is performed on the parent device object. This feature is not part of the ACPI specification and is provided for Windows compatibility only. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
Change the local variable in acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method() back into a pointer as ACPICA code base does. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
The new GPE handler callback has 2 additional parameters, gpe_device and gpe_number. typedef u32 (*acpi_gpe_handler) (acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number, void *context); Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
Some function and variable names are renamed to be consistent with ACPICA code base. acpi_raw_enable_gpe -> acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference acpi_raw_disable_gpe -> acpi_ev_remove_gpe_reference acpi_gpe_can_wake -> acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake acpi_gpe_wakeup -> acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask acpi_update_gpes -> acpi_update_all_gpes acpi_all_gpes_initialized -> acpi_gbl_all_gpes_initialized acpi_handler_info -> acpi_gpe_handler_info ... Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Lin Ming authored
Create a new file evxfgpe.c and move GPE specific functions to it. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Huang Ying authored
Generic Hardware Error Source provides a way to report platform hardware errors (such as that from chipset). It works in so called "Firmware First" mode, that is, hardware errors are reported to firmware firstly, then reported to Linux by firmware. This way, some non-standard hardware error registers or non-standard hardware link can be checked by firmware to produce more valuable hardware error information for Linux. This patch adds POLL/IRQ/NMI notification types support. Because the memory area used to transfer hardware error information from BIOS to Linux can be determined only in NMI, IRQ or timer handler, but general ioremap can not be used in atomic context, so a special version of atomic ioremap is implemented for that. Known issue: - Error information can not be printed for recoverable errors notified via NMI, because printk is not NMI-safe. Will fix this via delay printing to IRQ context via irq_work or make printk NMI-safe. v2: - adjust printk format per comments. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Zhang Rui authored
sysfs I/F for ACPI power devices, including AC and Battery, has been working in upstream kenrel since 2.6.24, Sep 2007. In 2.6.37, we made the sysfs I/F always built in and this option disabled by default. Now, we plan to remove this option and the ACPI power procfs interface in 2.6.39. First, update the feature-removal-schedule to announce this change. Second, add runtime warnings in ACPI AC/Battery/SBS driver, so that users will notice this change even if "make oldconfig" is used. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
Zhang Rui authored
Update CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS description because the processor, video and thermal zone procfs I/F have been removed. Some ACPI drivers, e.g. button, have their procfs I/F always built in, because we don't have sysfs I/F replacement at the moment. But once we finish developing the sysfs I/F for these driver, we need CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS to enabled/disable the corresponding procfs I/F. So just updating the description rather than removing this option, although there is no procfs I/F depends on it for now. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-