- 19 Apr, 2021 40 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Introduce the following functions to handle subpage dirty status: - btrfs_subpage_set_dirty() - btrfs_subpage_clear_dirty() - btrfs_subpage_test_dirty() These helpers can only be called when the range is ensured to be inside the page. - btrfs_page_set_dirty() - btrfs_page_clear_dirty() - btrfs_page_test_dirty() These helpers can handle both regular sector size and subpage without problem. Thus they would be used to replace PageDirty() related calls in later patches. There is one special point to note here, just like set_page_dirty() and clear_page_dirty_for_io(), btrfs_*page_set_dirty() and btrfs_*page_clear_dirty() must be called with page locked. Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
In btrfs_invalidatepage() we re-declare @tree variable as btrfs_ordered_inode_tree. Since it's only used to do the spinlock, we can grab it from inode directly, and remove the unnecessary declaration completely. Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
In btrfs_invalidatepage() we introduce a temporary variable, new_len, to update ordered->truncated_len. But we can use min() to replace it completely and no need for the variable. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Export supported sector sizes in /sys/fs/btrfs/features/supported_sectorsizes. Currently all architectures have PAGE_SIZE, There's some disparity between read-only and read-write support but that will be unified in the future so there's only one file exporting the size. The read-only support for systems with 64K pages also works for 4K sector size. This new sysfs interface would help eg. mkfs.btrfs to print more accurate warnings about potentially incompatible option combinations. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Currently a full send operation uses the standard btree readahead when iterating over the subvolume/snapshot btree, which despite bringing good performance benefits, it could be improved in a few aspects for use cases such as full send operations, which are guaranteed to visit every node and leaf of a btree, in ascending and sequential order. The limitations of that standard btree readahead implementation are the following: 1) It only triggers readahead for leaves that are physically close to the leaf being read, within a 64K range; 2) It only triggers readahead for the next or previous leaves if the leaf being read is not currently in memory; 3) It never triggers readahead for nodes. So add a new readahead mode that addresses all these points and use it for full send operations. The following test script was used to measure the improvement on a box using an average, consumer grade, spinning disk and with 16GiB of RAM: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj MKFS_OPTIONS="--nodesize 16384" # default, just to be explicit MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o max_inline=2048" # default, just to be explicit mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV > /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT # Create files with inline data to make it easier and faster to create # large btrees. add_files() { local total=$1 local start_offset=$2 local number_jobs=$3 local total_per_job=$(($total / $number_jobs)) echo "Creating $total new files using $number_jobs jobs" for ((n = 0; n < $number_jobs; n++)); do ( local start_num=$(($start_offset + $n * $total_per_job)) for ((i = 1; i <= $total_per_job; i++)); do local file_num=$((start_num + $i)) local file_path="$MNT/file_${file_num}" xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 2000" $file_path > /dev/null if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "Failed creating file $file_path" break fi done ) & worker_pids[$n]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} sync echo echo "btree node/leaf count: $(btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree -t 5 $DEV | egrep '^(node|leaf) ' | wc -l)" } initial_file_count=500000 add_files $initial_file_count 0 4 echo echo "Creating first snapshot..." btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 echo echo "Adding more files..." add_files $((initial_file_count / 4)) $initial_file_count 4 echo echo "Updating 1/50th of the initial files..." for ((i = 1; i < $initial_file_count; i += 50)); do xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 0 20" $MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done echo echo "Creating second snapshot..." btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 umount $MNT echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches blockdev --flushbufs $DEV &> /dev/null hdparm -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT echo echo "Testing full send..." start=$(date +%s) btrfs send $MNT/snap1 > /dev/null end=$(date +%s) echo echo "Full send took $((end - start)) seconds" umount $MNT The durations of the full send operation in seconds were the following: Before this change: 217 seconds After this change: 205 seconds (-5.7%) Signed-off-by:Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When we are running out of space for updating the chunk tree, that is, when we are low on available space in the system space info, if we have many task concurrently allocating block groups, via fallocate for example, many of them can end up all allocating new system chunks when only one is needed. In extreme cases this can lead to exhaustion of the system chunk array, which has a size limit of 2048 bytes, and results in a transaction abort with errno EFBIG, producing a trace in dmesg like the following, which was triggered on a PowerPC machine with a node/leaf size of 64K: [1359.518899] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1359.518980] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) [1359.519135] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 16463 at ../fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1968 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x340/0x3c0 [btrfs] [1359.519152] Modules linked in: (...) [1359.519239] Supported: Yes, External [1359.519252] CPU: 3 PID: 16463 Comm: stress-ng Tainted: G X 5.3.18-47-default #1 SLE15-SP3 [1359.519274] NIP: c008000000e36fe8 LR: c008000000e36fe4 CTR: 00000000006de8e8 [1359.519293] REGS: c00000056890b700 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G X (5.3.18-47-default) [1359.519317] MSR: 800000000282b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48008222 XER: 00000007 [1359.519356] CFAR: c00000000013e170 IRQMASK: 0 [1359.519356] GPR00: c008000000e36fe4 c00000056890b990 c008000000e83200 0000000000000026 [1359.519356] GPR04: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000d52a3b027651 0000000000000007 [1359.519356] GPR08: 0000000000000003 0000000000000001 0000000000000007 0000000000000000 [1359.519356] GPR12: 0000000000008000 c00000063fe44600 000000001015e028 000000001015dfd0 [1359.519356] GPR16: 000000000000404f 0000000000000001 0000000000010000 0000dd1e287affff [1359.519356] GPR20: 0000000000000001 c000000637c9a000 ffffffffffffffe5 0000000000000000 [1359.519356] GPR24: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000100 ffffffffffffffc0 [1359.519356] GPR28: c000000637c9a000 c000000630e09230 c000000630e091d8 c000000562188b08 [1359.519561] NIP [c008000000e36fe8] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x340/0x3c0 [btrfs] [1359.519613] LR [c008000000e36fe4] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x33c/0x3c0 [btrfs] [1359.519626] Call Trace: [1359.519671] [c00000056890b990] [c008000000e36fe4] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x33c/0x3c0 [btrfs] (unreliable) [1359.519729] [c00000056890ba90] [c008000000d68d44] __btrfs_end_transaction+0xbc/0x2f0 [btrfs] [1359.519782] [c00000056890bae0] [c008000000e309ac] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x154/0x610 [btrfs] [1359.519844] [c00000056890bba0] [c008000000d8a0fc] btrfs_fallocate+0xe4/0x10e0 [btrfs] [1359.519891] [c00000056890bd00] [c0000000004a23b4] vfs_fallocate+0x174/0x350 [1359.519929] [c00000056890bd50] [c0000000004a3cf8] ksys_fallocate+0x68/0xf0 [1359.519957] [c00000056890bda0] [c0000000004a3da8] sys_fallocate+0x28/0x40 [1359.519988] [c00000056890bdc0] [c000000000038968] system_call_exception+0xe8/0x170 [1359.520021] [c00000056890be20] [c00000000000cb70] system_call_common+0xf0/0x278 [1359.520037] Instruction dump: [1359.520049] 7d0049ad 40c2fff4 7c0004ac 71490004 40820024 2f83fffb 419e0048 3c620000 [1359.520082] e863bcb8 7ec4b378 48010d91 e8410018 <0fe00000> 3c820000 e884bcc8 7ec6b378 [1359.520122] ---[ end trace d6c186e151022e20 ]--- The following steps explain how we can end up in this situation: 1) Task A is at check_system_chunk(), either because it is allocating a new data or metadata block group, at btrfs_chunk_alloc(), or because it is removing a block group or turning a block group RO. It does not matter why; 2) Task A sees that there is not enough free space in the system space_info object, that is 'left' is < 'thresh'. And at this point the system space_info has a value of 0 for its 'bytes_may_use' counter; 3) As a consequence task A calls btrfs_alloc_chunk() in order to allocate a new system block group (chunk) and then reserves 'thresh' bytes in the chunk block reserve with the call to btrfs_block_rsv_add(). This changes the chunk block reserve's 'reserved' and 'size' counters by an amount of 'thresh', and changes the 'bytes_may_use' counter of the system space_info object from 0 to 'thresh'. Also during its call to btrfs_alloc_chunk(), we end up increasing the value of the 'total_bytes' counter of the system space_info object by 8MiB (the size of a system chunk stripe). This happens through the call chain: btrfs_alloc_chunk() create_chunk() btrfs_make_block_group() btrfs_update_space_info() 4) After it finishes the first phase of the block group allocation, at btrfs_chunk_alloc(), task A unlocks the chunk mutex; 5) At this point the new system block group was added to the transaction handle's list of new block groups, but its block group item, device items and chunk item were not yet inserted in the extent, device and chunk trees, respectively. That only happens later when we call btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() through a call to btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(); Note that only when we update the chunk tree, through the call to btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(), we decrement the 'reserved' counter of the chunk block reserve as we COW/allocate extent buffers, through: btrfs_alloc_tree_block() btrfs_use_block_rsv() btrfs_block_rsv_use_bytes() And the system space_info's 'bytes_may_use' is decremented everytime we allocate an extent buffer for COW operations on the chunk tree, through: btrfs_alloc_tree_block() btrfs_reserve_extent() find_free_extent() btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() If we end up COWing less chunk btree nodes/leaves than expected, which is the typical case since the amount of space we reserve is always pessimistic to account for the worst possible case, we release the unused space through: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata() btrfs_block_rsv_release() block_rsv_release_bytes() btrfs_space_info_free_bytes_may_use() But before task A gets into btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()... 6) Many other tasks start allocating new block groups through fallocate, each one does the first phase of block group allocation in a serialized way, since btrfs_chunk_alloc() takes the chunk mutex before calling check_system_chunk() and btrfs_alloc_chunk(). However before everyone enters the final phase of the block group allocation, that is, before calling btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), new tasks keep coming to allocate new block groups and while at check_system_chunk(), the system space_info's 'bytes_may_use' keeps increasing each time a task reserves space in the chunk block reserve. This means that eventually some other task can end up not seeing enough free space in the system space_info and decide to allocate yet another system chunk. This may repeat several times if yet more new tasks keep allocating new block groups before task A, and all the other tasks, finish the creation of the pending block groups, which is when reserved space in excess is released. Eventually this can result in exhaustion of system chunk array in the superblock, with btrfs_add_system_chunk() returning EFBIG, resulting later in a transaction abort. Even when we don't reach the extreme case of exhausting the system array, most, if not all, unnecessarily created system block groups end up being unused since when finishing creation of the first pending system block group, the creation of the following ones end up not needing to COW nodes/leaves of the chunk tree, so we never allocate and deallocate from them, resulting in them never being added to the list of unused block groups - as a consequence they don't get deleted by the cleaner kthread - the only exceptions are if we unmount and mount the filesystem again, which adds any unused block groups to the list of unused block groups, if a scrub is run, which also adds unused block groups to the unused list, and under some circumstances when using a zoned filesystem or async discard, which may also add unused block groups to the unused list. So fix this by: *) Tracking the number of reserved bytes for the chunk tree per transaction, which is the sum of reserved chunk bytes by each transaction handle currently being used; *) When there is not enough free space in the system space_info, if there are other transaction handles which reserved chunk space, wait for some of them to complete in order to have enough excess reserved space released, and then try again. Otherwise proceed with the creation of a new system chunk. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
If we reflink to or from a file opened with O_SYNC/O_DSYNC or to/from a file that has the S_SYNC attribute set, we totally ignore that and do not durably persist the reflink changes. Since a reflink can change the data readable from a file (and mtime/ctime, or a file size), it makes sense to durably persist (fsync) the source and destination files/ranges. This was previously discussed at: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20200903035225.GJ6090@magnolia/ The recently introduced test case generic/628, from fstests, exercises these scenarios and currently fails without this change. So make sure we fsync the source and destination files/ranges when either of them was opened with O_SYNC/O_DSYNC or has the S_SYNC attribute set, just like XFS already does. Signed-off-by:
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
gcc complains that the ctl->max_chunk_size member might be used uninitialized when none of the three conditions for initializing it in init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned() are true: In function ‘init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned’, inlined from ‘init_alloc_chunk_ctl’ at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5023:3, inlined from ‘btrfs_alloc_chunk’ at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5340:2: include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:48:45: error: ‘ctl.max_chunk_size’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] 4998 | ctl->max_chunk_size = min(limit, ctl->max_chunk_size); | ^~~ fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function ‘btrfs_alloc_chunk’: fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5316:32: note: ‘ctl’ declared here 5316 | struct alloc_chunk_ctl ctl; | ^~~ If we ever get into this condition, something is seriously wrong, as validity is checked in the callers btrfs_alloc_chunk init_alloc_chunk_ctl init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned so the same logic as in init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_regular() and a few other places should be applied. This avoids both further data corruption, and the compile-time warning. Fixes: 1cd6121f ("btrfs: zoned: implement zoned chunk allocator") Signed-off-by:Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by:
-
BingJing Chang authored
In commit d7781546 ("btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole."), existing holes can be skipped by calling find_first_non_hole() to adjust start and len. However, if the given len is invalid and large, when an EXTENT_MAP_HOLE extent is found, len will not be set to zero because (em->start + em->len) is less than (start + len). Then the ret will be 1 but len will not be set to 0. The propagated non-zero ret will result in fallocate failure. In the while-loop of btrfs_replace_file_extents(), len is not updated every time before it calls find_first_non_hole(). That is, after btrfs_drop_extents() successfully drops the last non-hole file extent, it may fail with ENOSPC when attempting to drop a file extent item representing a hole. The problem can happen. After it calls find_first_non_hole(), the cur_offset will be adjusted to be larger than or equal to end. However, since the len is not set to zero, the break-loop condition (ret && !len) will not be met. After it leaves the while-loop, fallocate will return 1, which is an unexpected return value. We're not able to construct a reproducible way to let btrfs_drop_extents() fail with ENOSPC after it drops the last non-hole file extent but with remaining holes left. However, it's quite easy to fix. We just need to update and check the len every time before we call find_first_non_hole(). To make the while loop more readable, we also pull the variable updates to the bottom of loop like this: while (cur_offset < end) { ... // update cur_offset & len // advance cur_offset & len in hole-punching case if needed } Reported-by:
Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Fixes: d7781546 ("btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole.") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@synology.com> Reviewed-by:
BingJing Chang <bingjingc@synology.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Commit 6e37d245 ("btrfs: zoned: fix deadlock on log sync") pointed out a deadlock warning and removed mutex_{lock,unlock} of fs_info::tree_root->log_mutex. While it looks like it always cause a deadlock, we didn't see actual deadlock in fstests runs. The reason is log_root_tree->log_mutex != fs_info->tree_root->log_mutex, not taking the same lock. So, the warning was actually a false-positive. Since btrfs_alloc_log_tree_node() is protected only by fs_info->tree_root->log_mutex, we can (and should) move the code out of the lock scope of log_root_tree->log_mutex and silence the warning. Fixes: 6e37d245 ("btrfs: zoned: fix deadlock on log sync") Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Looking at perf data for a fio workload I noticed that we were spending a pretty large chunk of time (around 5%) doing percpu_counter_sum() in need_preemptive_reclaim. This is silly, as we only want to know if we have more ordered than delalloc to see if we should be counting the delayed items in our threshold calculation. Change this to percpu_read_positive() to avoid the overhead. I ran this through fsperf to validate the changes, obviously the latency numbers in dbench and fio are quite jittery, so take them as you wish, but overall the improvements on throughput, iops, and bw are all positive. Each test was run two times, the given value is the average of both runs for their respective column. btrfs ssd normal test results bufferedrandwrite16g results metric baseline current diff ========================================================== write_io_kbytes 16777216 16777216 0.00% read_clat_ns_p99 0 0 0.00% write_bw_bytes 1.04e+08 1.05e+08 1.12% read_iops 0 0 0.00% write_clat_ns_p50 13888 11840 -14.75% read_io_kbytes 0 0 0.00% read_io_bytes 0 0 0.00% write_clat_ns_p99 35008 29312 -16.27% read_bw_bytes 0 0 0.00% elapsed 170 167 -1.76% write_lat_ns_min 4221.50 3762.50 -10.87% sys_cpu 39.65 35.37 -10.79% write_lat_ns_max 2.67e+10 2.50e+10 -6.63% read_lat_ns_min 0 0 0.00% write_iops 25270.10 25553.43 1.12% read_lat_ns_max 0 0 0.00% read_clat_ns_p50 0 0 0.00% dbench60 results metric baseline current diff ================================================== qpathinfo 11.12 12.73 14.52% throughput 416.09 445.66 7.11% flush 3485.63 1887.55 -45.85% qfileinfo 0.70 1.92 173.86% ntcreatex 992.60 695.76 -29.91% qfsinfo 2.43 3.71 52.48% close 1.67 3.14 88.09% sfileinfo 66.54 105.20 58.10% rename 809.23 619.59 -23.43% find 16.88 15.46 -8.41% unlink 820.54 670.86 -18.24% writex 3375.20 2637.91 -21.84% deltree 386.33 449.98 16.48% readx 3.43 3.41 -0.60% mkdir 0.05 0.03 -38.46% lockx 0.26 0.26 -0.76% unlockx 0.81 0.32 -60.33% dio4kbs16threads results metric baseline current diff ================================================================ write_io_kbytes 5249676 3357150 -36.05% read_clat_ns_p99 0 0 0.00% write_bw_bytes 89583501.50 57291192.50 -36.05% read_iops 0 0 0.00% write_clat_ns_p50 242688 263680 8.65% read_io_kbytes 0 0 0.00% read_io_bytes 0 0 0.00% write_clat_ns_p99 15826944 36732928 132.09% read_bw_bytes 0 0 0.00% elapsed 61 61 0.00% write_lat_ns_min 42704 42095 -1.43% sys_cpu 5.27 3.45 -34.52% write_lat_ns_max 7.43e+08 9.27e+08 24.71% read_lat_ns_min 0 0 0.00% write_iops 21870.97 13987.11 -36.05% read_lat_ns_max 0 0 0.00% read_clat_ns_p50 0 0 0.00% randwrite2xram results metric baseline current diff ================================================================ write_io_kbytes 24831972 28876262 16.29% read_clat_ns_p99 0 0 0.00% write_bw_bytes 83745273.50 92182192.50 10.07% read_iops 0 0 0.00% write_clat_ns_p50 13952 11648 -16.51% read_io_kbytes 0 0 0.00% read_io_bytes 0 0 0.00% write_clat_ns_p99 50176 52992 5.61% read_bw_bytes 0 0 0.00% elapsed 314 332 5.73% write_lat_ns_min 5920.50 5127 -13.40% sys_cpu 7.82 7.35 -6.07% write_lat_ns_max 5.27e+10 3.88e+10 -26.44% read_lat_ns_min 0 0 0.00% write_iops 20445.62 22505.42 10.07% read_lat_ns_max 0 0 0.00% read_clat_ns_p50 0 0 0.00% untarfirefox results metric baseline current diff ============================================== elapsed 47.41 47.40 -0.03% Signed-off-by:Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
There is a comment at btrfs_replace_file_extents() that mentions that we set the full sync flag on an inode when cloning into a file with a size greater than or equals to 16MiB, through try_release_extent_mapping() when we truncate the page cache after replacing file extents during a clone operation. That is not true anymore since commit 5e548b32 ("btrfs: do not set the full sync flag on the inode during page release"), so update the comment to remove that part and rephrase it slightly to make it more clear why the full sync flag is set at btrfs_replace_file_extents(). Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
btrfs_orphan_cleanup() has a comment referring to find_dead_roots, but function does not exists since commit cb517eab ("Btrfs: cleanup the similar code of the fs root read"). What we use now to find and load dead roots is btrfs_find_orphan_roots(). So update the comment and make it a bit more detailed about why we can not delete an orphan item for a root. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
We used to encode two different numbers in the tree mod log counter used for sequence numbers, one in the upper 32 bits and the other one in the lower 32 bits. However that is no longer the case, we stopped doing that since commit fcebe456 ("Btrfs: rework qgroup accounting"). So update the debug message at btrfs_check_delayed_seq to stop extracting the two 32 bits counters and print instead the 64 bits sequence numbers. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
There are two places outside the tree mod log module that extract the lowest sequence number of the tree mod log. These places end up duplicating code and open coding the logic and internal implementation details of the tree mod log. So add a helper to the tree mod log module and header that returns the lowest sequence number or 0 if there aren't any tree mod log users at the moment. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
At btrfs_tree_mod_log_free_eb() we check if we are dealing with a leaf, and if so, return immediately and do nothing. However this check can be removed, because after it we call tree_mod_need_log(), which returns false when given an extent buffer that corresponds to a leaf. So just remove the leaf check and pass the extent buffer to tree_mod_need_log(). Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Instead of exposing implementation details of the tree mod log to check if there are active tree mod log users at btrfs_free_tree_block(), use the new bit BTRFS_FS_TREE_MOD_LOG_USERS for fs_info->flags instead. This way extent-tree.c does not need to known about any of the internals of the tree mod log and avoids taking a lock unnecessarily as well. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The tree modification log functions are called very frequently, basically they are called every time a btree is modified (a pointer added or removed to a node, a new root for a btree is set, etc). Because of that, to avoid heavy lock contention on the lock that protects the list of tree mod log users, we have checks that test the emptiness of the list with a full memory barrier before the checks, so that when there are no tree mod log users we avoid taking the lock. Replace the memory barrier and list emptiness check with a test for a new bit set at fs_info->flags. This bit is used to indicate when there are tree mod log users, set whenever a user is added to the list and cleared when the last user is removed from the list. This makes the intention a bit more obvious and possibly more efficient (assuming test_bit() may be cheaper than a full memory barrier on some architectures). Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Several functions of the tree modification log use integers as booleans, so change them to use booleans instead, making their use more clear. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The tree modification log, which records modifications done to btrees, is quite large and currently spread all over ctree.c, which is a huge file already. To make things better organized, move all that code into its own separate source and header files. Functions and definitions that are used outside of the module (mostly by ctree.c) are renamed so that they start with a "btrfs_" prefix. Everything else remains unchanged. This makes it easier to go over the tree modification log code every time I need to go read it to fix a bug. Reviewed-by:
-
Ira Weiny authored
btrfsic_read_block() (which calls kmap()) and btrfsic_release_block_ctx() (which calls kunmap()) are always called within a single thread of execution. Therefore the mappings created within these calls can be a thread local mapping. Convert the kmap() of bloc_ctx->pagev to kmap_local_page(). Luckily the unmap loops backwards through the array pointer so no adjustment needs to be made to the unmapping order. Signed-off-by:
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Ira Weiny authored
Again there is an array of pointers which must be unmapped in the correct order. Convert the kmap()'s to kmap_local_page() and adjust the unmapping to work backwards through the unmapping loop. Signed-off-by:
-
Ira Weiny authored
These kmaps are thread local and don't need to be atomic. So they can use the more efficient kmap_local_page(). However, the mapping of pages in the stripes and the additional parity and qstripe pages are a bit trickier because the unmapping must occur in the opposite order from the mapping. Furthermore, the pointer array in __raid_recover_end_io() may get reordered. Convert these calls to kmap_local_page() taking care to reverse the unmappings of any page arrays as well as being careful with the mappings of any special pages such as the parity and qstripe pages. Signed-off-by:
-
Ira Weiny authored
Use a simple coccinelle script to help convert the most common kmap()/kunmap() patterns to kmap_local_page()/kunmap_local(). Note that some kmaps which were caught by this script needed to be handled by hand because of the strict unmapping order of kunmap_local() so they are not included in this patch. But this script got us started. There's another temp variable added for the final length write to the first page so it does not interfere with cpage_out that is used for mapping other pages. The development of this patch was aided by the follow script: // <smpl> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only // Find kmap and replace with kmap_local_page then mark kunmap // // Confidence: Low // Copyright: (C) 2021 Intel Corporation // URL: http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/ @ catch_all @ expression e, e2; @@ ( -kmap(e) +kmap_local_page(e) ) ... ( -kunmap(...) +kunmap_local() ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
The in_range() macro is defined twice in btrfs' source, once in ctree.h and once in misc.h. Remove the definition in ctree.h and include misc.h in the files depending on it. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Currently btrfs_inode_in_log() checks the list of modified extents of the inode, and has a comment mentioning why, as it used to be necessary to make sure if we did something like the following: mmap write range A mmap write range B msync range A (ranged fsync) msync range B (ranged fsync) we ended up with both ranges being logged. If we did not check it, then the second fsync would do nothing because btrfs_inode_in_log() would return true. This was added in 125c4cf9 ("Btrfs: set inode's logged_trans/last_log_commit after ranged fsync") and test case generic/325 from fstests exercises that scenario. However, as of commit 48778179 ("btrfs: make fast fsyncs wait only for writeback"), every ranged fsync is now turned into a full ranged fsync (operates on the range from 0 to LLONG_MAX), so it is now pointless to test of emptiness of the list of modified extents, and the comment is clearly outdated. So just remove the comment and list emptiness check, while also changing the function's return type to be a boolean instead of an integer. In case one day we get support for ranged fsyncs again, it will be easy to notice the check is necessary again, because it will make generic/325 always fail. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
We have a race between marking that an inode needs to be logged, either at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() or at btrfs_page_mkwrite(), and between btrfs_sync_log(). The following steps describe how the race happens. 1) We are at transaction N; 2) Inode I was previously fsynced in the current transaction so it has: inode->logged_trans set to N; 3) The inode's root currently has: root->log_transid set to 1 root->last_log_commit set to 0 Which means only one log transaction was committed to far, log transaction 0. When a log tree is created we set ->log_transid and ->last_log_commit of its parent root to 0 (at btrfs_add_log_tree()); 4) One more range of pages is dirtied in inode I; 5) Some task A starts an fsync against some other inode J (same root), and so it joins log transaction 1. Before task A calls btrfs_sync_log()... 6) Task B starts an fsync against inode I, which currently has the full sync flag set, so it starts delalloc and waits for the ordered extent to complete before calling btrfs_inode_in_log() at btrfs_sync_file(); 7) During ordered extent completion we have btrfs_update_inode() called against inode I, which in turn calls btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), which does the following: spin_lock(&inode->lock); inode->last_trans = trans->transaction->transid; inode->last_sub_trans = inode->root->log_transid; inode->last_log_commit = inode->root->last_log_commit; spin_unlock(&inode->lock); So ->last_trans is set to N and ->last_sub_trans set to 1. But before setting ->last_log_commit... 8) Task A is at btrfs_sync_log(): - it increments root->log_transid to 2 - starts writeback for all log tree extent buffers - waits for the writeback to complete - writes the super blocks - updates root->last_log_commit to 1 It's a lot of slow steps between updating root->log_transid and root->last_log_commit; 9) The task doing the ordered extent completion, currently at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), then finally runs: inode->last_log_commit = inode->root->last_log_commit; spin_unlock(&inode->lock); Which results in inode->last_log_commit being set to 1. The ordered extent completes; 10) Task B is resumed, and it calls btrfs_inode_in_log() which returns true because we have all the following conditions met: inode->logged_trans == N which matches fs_info->generation && inode->last_subtrans (1) <= inode->last_log_commit (1) && inode->last_subtrans (1) <= root->last_log_commit (1) && list inode->extent_tree.modified_extents is empty And as a consequence we return without logging the inode, so the existing logged version of the inode does not point to the extent that was written after the previous fsync. It should be impossible in practice for one task be able to do so much progress in btrfs_sync_log() while another task is at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() right after it reads root->log_transid and before it reads root->last_log_commit. Even if kernel preemption is enabled we know the task at btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() can not be preempted because it is holding the inode's spinlock. However there is another place where we do the same without holding the spinlock, which is in the memory mapped write path at: vm_fault_t btrfs_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf) { (...) BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans = fs_info->generation; BTRFS_I(inode)->last_sub_trans = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->log_transid; BTRFS_I(inode)->last_log_commit = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->last_log_commit; (...) So with preemption happening after setting ->last_sub_trans and before setting ->last_log_commit, it is less of a stretch to have another task do enough progress at btrfs_sync_log() such that the task doing the memory mapped write ends up with ->last_sub_trans and ->last_log_commit set to the same value. It is still a big stretch to get there, as the task doing btrfs_sync_log() has to start writeback, wait for its completion and write the super blocks. So fix this in two different ways: 1) For btrfs_set_inode_last_trans(), simply set ->last_log_commit to the value of ->last_sub_trans minus 1; 2) For btrfs_page_mkwrite() only set the inode's ->last_sub_trans, just like we do for buffered and direct writes at btrfs_file_write_iter(), which is all we need to make sure multiple writes and fsyncs to an inode in the same transaction never result in an fsync missing that the inode changed and needs to be logged. Turn this into a helper function and use it both at btrfs_page_mkwrite() and at btrfs_file_write_iter() - this also fixes the problem that at btrfs_page_mkwrite() we were setting those fields without the protection of the inode's spinlock. This is an extremely unlikely race to happen in practice. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
When doing an fsync we flush all delalloc, lock the inode (VFS lock), flush any new delalloc that might have been created before taking the lock and then wait either for the ordered extents to complete or just for the writeback to complete (depending on whether the full sync flag is set or not). We then start logging the inode and assume that while we are doing it no one else is touching the inode's file extent items (or adding new ones). That is generally true because all operations that modify an inode acquire the inode's lock first, including buffered and direct IO writes. However there is one exception: memory mapped writes, which do not and can not acquire the inode's lock. This can cause two types of issues: ending up logging file extent items with overlapping ranges, which is detected by the tree checker and will result in aborting the transaction when starting writeback for a log tree's extent buffers, or a silent corruption where we log a version of the file that never existed. Scenario 1 - logging overlapping extents The following steps explain how we can end up with file extents items with overlapping ranges in a log tree due to a race between a fsync and memory mapped writes: 1) Task A starts an fsync on inode X, which has the full sync runtime flag set. First it starts by flushing all delalloc for the inode; 2) Task A then locks the inode and flushes any other delalloc that might have been created after the previous flush and waits for all ordered extents to complete; 3) In the inode's root we have the following leaf: Leaf N, generation == current transaction id: --------------------------------------------------------- | (...) [ file extent item, offset 640K, length 128K ] | --------------------------------------------------------- The last file extent item in leaf N covers the file range from 640K to 768K; 4) Task B does a memory mapped write for the page corresponding to the file range from 764K to 768K; 5) Task A starts logging the inode. At copy_inode_items_to_log() it uses btrfs_search_forward() to search for leafs modified in the current transaction that contain items for the inode. It finds leaf N and copies all the inode items from that leaf into the log tree. Now the log tree has a copy of the last file extent item from leaf N. At the end of the while loop at copy_inode_items_to_log(), we have the minimum key set to: min_key.objectid = <inode X number> min_key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY min_key.offset = 640K Then we increment the key's offset by 1 so that the next call to btrfs_search_forward() leaves us at the first key greater than the key we just processed. But before btrfs_search_forward() is called again... 6) Dellaloc for the page at offset 764K, dirtied by task B, is started. It can be started for several reasons: - The async reclaim task is attempting to satisfy metadata or data reservation requests, and it has reached a point where it decided to flush delalloc; - Due to memory pressure the VMM triggers writeback of dirty pages; - The system call sync_file_range(2) is called from user space. 7) When the respective ordered extent completes, it trims the length of the existing file extent item for file offset 640K from 128K to 124K, and a new file extent item is added with a key offset of 764K and a length of 4K; 8) Task A calls btrfs_search_forward(), which returns us a path pointing to the leaf (can be leaf N or some other) containing the new file extent item for file offset 764K. We end up copying this item to the log tree, which overlaps with the last copied file extent item, which covers the file range from 640K to 768K. When writeback is triggered for log tree's extent buffers, the issue will be detected by the tree checker which will dump a trace and an error message on dmesg/syslog. If the writeback is triggered when syncing the log, which typically is, then we also end up aborting the current transaction. This is the same type of problem fixed in 0c713cba ("Btrfs: fix race between ranged fsync and writeback of adjacent ranges"). Scenario 2 - logging a version of the file that never existed This scenario only happens when using the NO_HOLES feature and results in a silent corruption, in the sense that is not detectable by 'btrfs check' or the tree checker: 1) We have an inode I with a size of 1M and two file extent items, one covering an extent with disk_bytenr == X for the file range [0, 512K) and another one covering another extent with disk_bytenr == Y for the file range [512K, 1M); 2) A hole is punched for the file range [512K, 1M); 3) Task A starts an fsync of inode I, which has the full sync runtime flag set. It starts by flushing all existing delalloc, locks the inode (VFS lock), starts any new delalloc that might have been created before taking the lock and waits for all ordered extents to complete; 4) Some other task does a memory mapped write for the page corresponding to the file range [640K, 644K) for example; 5) Task A then logs all items of the inode with the call to copy_inode_items_to_log(); 6) In the meanwhile delalloc for the range [640K, 644K) is started. It can be started for several reasons: - The async reclaim task is attempting to satisfy metadata or data reservation requests, and it has reached a point where it decided to flush delalloc; - Due to memory pressure the VMM triggers writeback of dirty pages; - The system call sync_file_range(2) is called from user space. 7) The ordered extent for the range [640K, 644K) completes and a file extent item for that range is added to the subvolume tree, pointing to a 4K extent with a disk_bytenr == Z; 8) Task A then calls btrfs_log_holes(), to scan for implicit holes in the subvolume tree. It finds two implicit holes: - one for the file range [512K, 640K) - one for the file range [644K, 1M) As a result we end up neither logging a hole for the range [640K, 644K) nor logging the file extent item with a disk_bytenr == Z. This means that if we have a power failure and replay the log tree we end up getting the following file extent layout: [ disk_bytenr X ] [ hole ] [ disk_bytenr Y ] [ hole ] 0 512K 512K 640K 640K 644K 644K 1M Which does not corresponding to any layout the file ever had before the power failure. The only two valid layouts would be: [ disk_bytenr X ] [ hole ] 0 512K 512K 1M and [ disk_bytenr X ] [ hole ] [ disk_bytenr Z ] [ hole ] 0 512K 512K 640K 640K 644K 644K 1M This can be fixed by serializing memory mapped writes with fsync, and there are two ways to do it: 1) Make a fsync lock the entire file range, from 0 to (u64)-1 / LLONG_MAX in the inode's io tree. This prevents the race but also blocks any reads during the duration of the fsync, which has a negative impact for many common workloads; 2) Make an fsync write lock the i_mmap_lock semaphore in the inode. This semaphore was recently added by Josef's patch set: btrfs: add a i_mmap_lock to our inode btrfs: cleanup inode_lock/inode_unlock uses btrfs: exclude mmaps while doing remap btrfs: exclude mmap from happening during all fallocate operations and is used to solve races between memory mapped writes and clone/dedupe/fallocate. This also makes us have the same behaviour we have regarding other writes (buffered and direct IO) and fsync - block them while the inode logging is in progress. This change uses the second approach due to the performance impact of the first one. Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
There's a small window where a deadlock can happen between fallocate and mmap. This is described in detail by Filipe: """ When doing a fallocate operation we lock the inode, flush delalloc within the target range, wait for any ordered extents to complete and then lock the file range. Before we lock the range and after we flush delalloc, there is a time window where another task can come in and do a memory mapped write for a page within the fallocate range. This means that after fallocate locks the range, there can be a dirty page in the range. More often than not, this does not cause any problem. The exception is when we are low on available metadata space, because an fallocate operation needs to start a transaction while holding the file range locked, either through btrfs_prealloc_file_range() or through the call to btrfs_fallocate_update_isize(). If that's the case, we can end up in a deadlock. The following list of steps explains how that happens: 1) A fallocate operation starts, locks the inode, flushes delalloc in the range and waits for ordered extents in the range to complete; 2) Before the fallocate task locks the file range, another task does a memory mapped write for a page in the fallocate target range. This is possible since memory mapped writes do not (and can not) lock the inode; 3) The fallocate task locks the file range. At this point there is one dirty page in the range (due to the memory mapped write); 4) When the fallocate task attempts to start a transaction, it blocks when attempting to reserve metadata space, since we are low on available metadata space. Before blocking (wait on its reservation ticket), it starts the async reclaim task (if not running already); 5) The async reclaim task is not able to release space through any other means, so it decides to flush delalloc for inodes with dirty pages. It finds that the inode used in the fallocate operation has a dirty page and therefore queues a job (fs_info->flush_workers workqueue) to flush delalloc for that inode and waits on that job to complete; 6) The flush job blocks when attempting to lock the file range because it is currently locked by the fallocate task; 7) The fallocate task keeps waiting for its metadata reservation, waiting for a wakeup on its reservation ticket. The async reclaim task is waiting on the flush job, which in turn is waiting for locking the file range that is currently locked by the fallocate task. So unless some other task is able to release enough metadata space, for example an ordered extent for some other inode completes, we end up in a deadlock between all these tasks. When this happens stack traces like the following show up in dmesg/syslog: INFO: task kworker/u16:11:1810830 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u16:11 state:D stack: 0 pid:1810830 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 schedule+0x45/0xe0 lock_extent_bits+0x1e6/0x2d0 [btrfs] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 btrfs_invalidatepage+0x32c/0x390 [btrfs] ? __mod_memcg_state+0x8e/0x160 __extent_writepage+0x2d4/0x400 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b2/0x500 [btrfs] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xf0 extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 do_writepages+0x43/0xe0 ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xa4/0x100 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xc5/0x100 btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x17/0x40 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0xf1/0x600 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 kthread+0x153/0x170 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 INFO: task kworker/u16:1:2426217 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u16:1 state:D stack: 0 pid:2426217 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] Call Trace: __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 schedule+0x45/0xe0 schedule_timeout+0x30c/0x580 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 ? try_to_wake_up+0x7a/0xa20 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 ? lock_acquired+0x199/0x490 ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 wait_for_completion+0xab/0x110 start_delalloc_inodes+0x2af/0x390 [btrfs] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x12d/0x250 [btrfs] flush_space+0x24f/0x660 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x1bb/0x480 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 worker_thread+0x20f/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 kthread+0x153/0x170 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 (...) several tasks waiting for the inode lock held by the fallocate task below (...) RIP: 0033:0x7f61efe73fff Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7f61efe73fd5. RSP: 002b:00007ffc3371bbe8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000013c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc3371bea0 RCX: 00007f61efe73fff RDX: 00000000ffffff9c RSI: 0000560fbd5d90a0 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc3371beb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 R10: 0000560fbd5d7ad0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000000000000005e R14: 00007ffc3371bea0 R15: 00007ffc3371beb0 task:fdm-stress state:D stack: 0 pid:2508243 ppid:2508153 flags:0x00000000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 schedule+0x45/0xe0 __reserve_bytes+0x4a4/0xb10 [btrfs] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x29/0x190 [btrfs] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x2d1/0x760 [btrfs] btrfs_replace_file_extents+0x120/0x930 [btrfs] ? btrfs_fallocate+0xdcf/0x1260 [btrfs] btrfs_fallocate+0xdfb/0x1260 [btrfs] ? filename_lookup+0xf1/0x180 vfs_fallocate+0x14f/0x440 ioctl_preallocate+0x92/0xc0 do_vfs_ioctl+0x66b/0x750 ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x53/0x60 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x62/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 """ Fix this by disallowing mmaps from happening while we're doing any of the fallocate operations on this inode. Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Darrick reported a potential issue to me where we could allow mmap writes after validating a page range matched in the case of dedupe. Generally we rely on lock page -> lock extent with the ordered flush to protect us, but this is done after we check the pages because we use the generic helpers, so we could modify the page in between doing the check and locking the range. There also exists a deadlock, as described by Filipe """ When cloning a file range, we lock the inodes, flush any delalloc within the respective file ranges, wait for any ordered extents and then lock the file ranges in both inodes. This means that right after we flush delalloc and before we lock the file ranges, memory mapped writes can come in and dirty pages in the file ranges of the clone operation. Most of the time this is harmless and causes no problems. However, if we are low on available metadata space, we can later end up in a deadlock when starting a transaction to replace file extent items. This happens if when allocating metadata space for the transaction, we need to wait for the async reclaim thread to release space and the reclaim thread needs to flush delalloc for the inode that got the memory mapped write and has its range locked by the clone task. Basically what happens is the following: 1) A clone operation locks inodes A and B, flushes delalloc for both inodes in the respective file ranges and waits for any ordered extents in those ranges to complete; 2) Before the clone task locks the file ranges, another task does a memory mapped write (which does not lock the inode) for one of the inodes of the clone operation. So now we have a dirty page in one of the ranges used by the clone operation; 3) The clone operation locks the file ranges for inodes A and B; 4) Later, when iterating over the file extents of inode A, the clone task attempts to start a transaction. There's not enough available free metadata space, so the async reclaim task is started (if not running already) and we wait for someone to wake us up on our reservation ticket; 5) The async reclaim task is not able to release space by any other means and decides to flush delalloc for the inode of the clone operation; 6) The workqueue job used to flush the inode blocks when starting delalloc for the inode, since the file range is currently locked by the clone task; 7) But the clone task is waiting on its reservation ticket and the async reclaim task is waiting on the flush job to complete, which can't progress since the clone task has the file range locked. So unless some other task is able to release space, for example an ordered extent for some other inode completes, we have a deadlock between all these tasks; When this happens stack traces like the following show up in dmesg/syslog: INFO: task kworker/u16:11:1810830 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u16:11 state:D stack: 0 pid:1810830 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 schedule+0x45/0xe0 lock_extent_bits+0x1e6/0x2d0 [btrfs] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 btrfs_invalidatepage+0x32c/0x390 [btrfs] ? __mod_memcg_state+0x8e/0x160 __extent_writepage+0x2d4/0x400 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b2/0x500 [btrfs] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xf0 extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 do_writepages+0x43/0xe0 ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xa4/0x100 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xc5/0x100 btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x17/0x40 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0xf1/0x600 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 kthread+0x153/0x170 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 INFO: task kworker/u16:1:2426217 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u16:1 state:D stack: 0 pid:2426217 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] Call Trace: __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 schedule+0x45/0xe0 schedule_timeout+0x30c/0x580 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 ? try_to_wake_up+0x7a/0xa20 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 ? lock_acquired+0x199/0x490 ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 wait_for_completion+0xab/0x110 start_delalloc_inodes+0x2af/0x390 [btrfs] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x12d/0x250 [btrfs] flush_space+0x24f/0x660 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x1bb/0x480 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 worker_thread+0x20f/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 kthread+0x153/0x170 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 (...) several other tasks blocked on inode locks held by the clone task below (...) RIP: 0033:0x7f61efe73fff Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7f61efe73fd5. RSP: 002b:00007ffc3371bbe8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000013c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc3371bea0 RCX: 00007f61efe73fff RDX: 00000000ffffff9c RSI: 0000560fbd604690 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc3371beb0 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000560fbd5d75f0 R10: 0000560fbd5d81f0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007ffc3371bea0 R15: 00007ffc3371beb0 task: fdm-stress state:D stack: 0 pid:2508234 ppid:2508153 flags:0x00004000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 schedule+0x45/0xe0 __reserve_bytes+0x4a4/0xb10 [btrfs] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x29/0x190 [btrfs] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x2d1/0x760 [btrfs] btrfs_replace_file_extents+0x120/0x930 [btrfs] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 btrfs_clone+0x3e4/0x7e0 [btrfs] ? btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent+0x8e/0x100 [btrfs] btrfs_clone_files+0xf6/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x324/0x3d0 [btrfs] do_clone_file_range+0xd4/0x1f0 vfs_clone_file_range+0x4d/0x230 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 ioctl_file_clone+0x8f/0xc0 do_vfs_ioctl+0x342/0x750 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x62/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 """ Fix both of these issues by excluding mmaps from happening we are doing any sort of remap, which prevents this race completely. Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
A few places we intermix btrfs_inode_lock with a inode_unlock, and some places we just use inode_lock/inode_unlock instead of btrfs_inode_lock. None of these places are using this incorrectly, but as we adjust some of these callers it would be nice to keep everything consistent, so convert everybody to use btrfs_inode_lock/btrfs_inode_unlock. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We need to be able to exclude page_mkwrite from happening concurrently with certain operations. To facilitate this, add a i_mmap_lock to our inode, down_read() it in our mkwrite, and add a new ILOCK flag to indicate that we want to take the i_mmap_lock as well. I used pahole to check the size of the btrfs_inode, the sizes are as follows no lockdep: before: 1120 (3 per 4k page) after: 1160 (3 per 4k page) lockdep: before: 2072 (1 per 4k page) after: 2224 (1 per 4k page) We're slightly larger but it doesn't change how many objects we can fit per page. Reviewed-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
The parameter mirror is not used and does not make sense for checksum verification of the given bio. Signed-off-by:
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
force_cow can be calculated from inode and does not need to be passed as an argument. This simplifies run_delalloc_nocow() call from btrfs_run_delalloc_range() A new function, should_nocow() checks if the range should be NOCOWed or not. The function returns true iff either BTRFS_INODE_NODATA or BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC, but is not a defrag extent. Tested-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Jiapeng Chong authored
Fix the following coccicheck warnings: ./fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1462:10-11: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'dev_extent_hole_check_zoned' with return type bool. Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Currently we do not do btree read ahead when doing an incremental send, however we know that we will read and process any node or leaf in the send root that has a generation greater than the generation of the parent root. So triggering read ahead for such nodes and leafs is beneficial for an incremental send. This change does that, triggers read ahead of any node or leaf in the send root that has a generation greater then the generation of the parent root. As for the parent root, no readahead is triggered because knowing in advance which nodes/leaves are going to be read is not so linear and there's often a large time window between visiting nodes or leaves of the parent root. So I opted to leave out the parent root, and triggering read ahead for its nodes/leaves seemed to have not made significant difference. The following test script was used to measure the improvement on a box using an average, consumer grade, spinning disk and with 16GiB of ram: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj MKFS_OPTIONS="--nodesize 16384" # default, just to be explicit MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o max_inline=2048" # default, just to be explicit mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV > /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT # Create files with inline data to make it easier and faster to create # large btrees. add_files() { local total=$1 local start_offset=$2 local number_jobs=$3 local total_per_job=$(($total / $number_jobs)) echo "Creating $total new files using $number_jobs jobs" for ((n = 0; n < $number_jobs; n++)); do ( local start_num=$(($start_offset + $n * $total_per_job)) for ((i = 1; i <= $total_per_job; i++)); do local file_num=$((start_num + $i)) local file_path="$MNT/file_${file_num}" xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 2000" $file_path > /dev/null if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "Failed creating file $file_path" break fi done ) & worker_pids[$n]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} sync echo echo "btree node/leaf count: $(btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree -t 5 $DEV | egrep '^(node|leaf) ' | wc -l)" } initial_file_count=500000 add_files $initial_file_count 0 4 echo echo "Creating first snapshot..." btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 echo echo "Adding more files..." add_files $((initial_file_count / 4)) $initial_file_count 4 echo echo "Updating 1/50th of the initial files..." for ((i = 1; i < $initial_file_count; i += 50)); do xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 0 20" $MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done echo echo "Creating second snapshot..." btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 umount $MNT echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches blockdev --flushbufs $DEV &> /dev/null hdparm -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT echo echo "Testing full send..." start=$(date +%s) btrfs send $MNT/snap1 > /dev/null end=$(date +%s) echo echo "Full send took $((end - start)) seconds" umount $MNT echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches blockdev --flushbufs $DEV &> /dev/null hdparm -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT echo echo "Testing incremental send..." start=$(date +%s) btrfs send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 > /dev/null end=$(date +%s) echo echo "Incremental send took $((end - start)) seconds" umount $MNT Before this change, incremental send duration: with $initial_file_count == 200000: 51 seconds with $initial_file_count == 500000: 168 seconds After this change, incremental send duration: with $initial_file_count == 200000: 39 seconds (-26.7%) with $initial_file_count == 500000: 125 seconds (-29.4%) For $initial_file_count == 200000 there are 62600 nodes and leaves in the btree of the first snapshot, and 77759 nodes and leaves in the btree of the second snapshot. The root nodes were at level 2. While for $initial_file_count == 500000 there are 152476 nodes and leaves in the btree of the first snapshot, and 190511 nodes and leaves in the btree of the second snapshot. The root nodes were at level 2 as well. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
When doing a full send we know that we are going to be reading every node and leaf of the send root, so we benefit from enabling read ahead for the btree. This change enables read ahead for full send operations only, incremental sends will have read ahead enabled in a different way by a separate patch. The following test script was used to measure the improvement on a box using an average, consumer grade, spinning disk and with 16GiB of RAM: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj MKFS_OPTIONS="--nodesize 16384" # default, just to be explicit MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o max_inline=2048" # default, just to be explicit mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV > /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT # Create files with inline data to make it easier and faster to create # large btrees. add_files() { local total=$1 local start_offset=$2 local number_jobs=$3 local total_per_job=$(($total / $number_jobs)) echo "Creating $total new files using $number_jobs jobs" for ((n = 0; n < $number_jobs; n++)); do ( local start_num=$(($start_offset + $n * $total_per_job)) for ((i = 1; i <= $total_per_job; i++)); do local file_num=$((start_num + $i)) local file_path="$MNT/file_${file_num}" xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 2000" $file_path > /dev/null if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "Failed creating file $file_path" break fi done ) & worker_pids[$n]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} sync echo echo "btree node/leaf count: $(btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree -t 5 $DEV | egrep '^(node|leaf) ' | wc -l)" } initial_file_count=500000 add_files $initial_file_count 0 4 echo echo "Creating first snapshot..." btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 echo echo "Adding more files..." add_files $((initial_file_count / 4)) $initial_file_count 4 echo echo "Updating 1/50th of the initial files..." for ((i = 1; i < $initial_file_count; i += 50)); do xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 0 20" $MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done echo echo "Creating second snapshot..." btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 umount $MNT echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches blockdev --flushbufs $DEV &> /dev/null hdparm -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT echo echo "Testing full send..." start=$(date +%s) btrfs send $MNT/snap1 > /dev/null end=$(date +%s) echo echo "Full send took $((end - start)) seconds" umount $MNT echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches blockdev --flushbufs $DEV &> /dev/null hdparm -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT echo echo "Testing incremental send..." start=$(date +%s) btrfs send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 > /dev/null end=$(date +%s) echo echo "Incremental send took $((end - start)) seconds" umount $MNT Before this change, full send duration: with $initial_file_count == 200000: 165 seconds with $initial_file_count == 500000: 407 seconds After this change, full send duration: with $initial_file_count == 200000: 149 seconds (-10.2%) with $initial_file_count == 500000: 353 seconds (-14.2%) For $initial_file_count == 200000 there are 62600 nodes and leaves in the btree of the first snapshot, while for $initial_file_count == 500000 there are 152476 nodes and leaves. The roots were at level 2. Signed-off-by: -
Nikolay Borisov authored
btrfs_block_rsv_add can return only ENOSPC since it's called with NO_FLUSH modifier. This so simplify the logic in btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata to exploit this invariant. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It's only used for tracepoint to obtain the inode number, but we already have the ino from btrfs_delayed_node::inode_id. Reviewed-by:
-
