Make devcaps code self-contained so that it's easier to cache
and operate on them.
As the number of devcaps got bigger the code dealing with them
got more and more tricky. Lets create a central place to deal
with all the complexity. This lets us remove the lock we used
to require to deal with register write races because we only
read the devcaps at initialization.
Signed-off-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Krastev <krastevm@vmware.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210609172307.131929-2-zackr@vmware.com

Putting the panel under the bridge chip (under the aux-bus node)
allows the panel driver to get access to the DP AUX bus, enabling all
sorts of fabulous new features.

While we're at this, get rid of a level of hierarchy for the panel
node. It doesn't need "ports / port" and can just have a "port" child.

For Linux, this patch has a hard requirement on the patches adding DP
AUX bus support to the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip driver. See the patch
("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add support for the DP AUX bus").
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.11.Ibdb7735fb1844561b902252215a69526a14f9abd@changeid

As I was testing to make sure that the DEFER path worked well with my
patch series, I got tired of seeing this scary message in my logs just
because the panel needed to defer:
  [drm:ti_sn_bridge_probe] *ERROR* could not find any panel node

Let's use dev_err_probe() which nicely quiets this error and also
simplifies the code a tiny bit. We'll also update other places in the
file which can use dev_err_probe().
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.10.I24bba069e63b1eea84443eef0c8535fd032a6311@changeid

This is really just a revert of commit 58074b08 ("drm/bridge:
ti-sn65dsi86: Read EDID blob over DDC"), resolving conflicts.

The old code failed to read the EDID properly in a very important
case: before the bridge's pre_enable() was called. The way things need
to work:
1. Read the EDID.
2. Based on the EDID, decide on video settings and pixel clock.
3. Enable the bridge w/ the desired settings.

The way things were working:
1. Try to read the EDID but fail; fall back to hardcoded values.
2. Based on hardcoded values, decide on video settings and pixel clock.
3. Enable the bridge w/ the desired settings.
4. Try again to read the EDID, it works now!
5. Realize that the hardcoded settings weren't quite right.
6. Disable / reenable the bridge w/ the right settings.

The reasons for the failures were twofold:
a) Since we never ran the bridge chip's pre-enable then we never set
   the bit to ignore HPD. This meant the bridge chip didn't even _try_
   to go out on the bus and communicate with the panel.
b) Even if we fixed things to ignore HPD, the EDID still wouldn't read
   if the panel wasn't on.

Instead of reverting the code, we could fix it to set the HPD bit and
also power on the panel. However, it also works nicely to just let the
panel code read the EDID. Now that we've split the driver up we can
expose the DDC AUX channel bus to the panel node. The panel can take
charge of reading the EDID.

NOTE: in order for things to work, anyone that needs to read the EDID
will need to instantiate their panel using the new DP AUX bus (AKA by
listing their panel under the "aux-bus" node of the bridge chip in the
device tree).

In the future if we want to use the bridge chip to provide a full
external DP port (which won't have a panel) then we will have to
conditinally add EDID reading back in.
Suggested-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.9.I9330684c25f65bb318eff57f0616500f83eac3cc@changeid

We want to provide our panel with access to the DP AUX channel. The
way to do this is to let our panel be a child of ours using the fancy
new DP AUX bus support.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.8.Ib5fe0638da85800141ce141bb8e441c5f25438d4@changeid

On its own, this change looks a little strange and doesn't do too much
useful. To understand why we're doing this we need to look forward to
future patches where we're going to probe our panel using the new DP
AUX bus. See the patch ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add support for the
DP AUX bus").

Let's think about the set of steps we'll want to happen when we have
the DP AUX bus:

1. We'll create the DP AUX bus.
2. We'll populate the devices on the DP AUX bus (AKA our panel).
3. For setting up the bridge-related functions of ti-sn65dsi86 we'll
   need to get a reference to the panel.

If we do #1 - #3 in a single probe call things _mostly_ will work, but
it won't be massively robust. Let's explore.

First let's think of the easy case of no -EPROBE_DEFER. In that case
in step #2 when we populate the devices on the DP AUX bus it will
actually try probing the panel right away. Since the panel probe
doesn't defer then in step #3 we'll get a reference to the panel and
we're golden.

Second, let's think of the case when the panel returns
-EPROBE_DEFER. In that case step #2 won't synchronously create the
panel (it'll just add the device to the defer list to do it
later). Step #3 will fail to get the panel and the bridge sub-device
will return -EPROBE_DEFER. We'll depopulate the DP AUX bus. Later
we'll try the whole sequence again. Presumably the panel will
eventually stop returning -EPROBE_DEFER and we'll go back to the first
case where things were golden. So this case is OK too even if it's a
bit ugly that we have to keep creating / deleting the AUX bus over and
over.

So where is the problem? As I said, it's mostly about robustness. I
don't believe that step #2 (creating the sub-devices) is really
guaranteed to be synchronous. This is evidenced by the fact that it's
allowed to "succeed" by just sticking the device on the deferred
list. If anything about the process changes in Linux as a whole and
step #2 just kicks off the probe of the DP AUX endpoints (our panel)
in the background then we'd be in trouble because we might never get
the panel in step #3.

Adding an extra sub-device means we just don't need to worry about
it. We'll create the sub-device for the DP AUX bus and it won't go
away until the whole ti-sn65dsi86 driver goes away. If the bridge
sub-device defers (maybe because it can't find the panel) that won't
depopulate the DP AUX bus and so we don't need to worry about it.

NOTE: there's a little bit of a trick here. Though the AUX channel can
run without the MIPI-to-eDP bits of the code, the MIPI-to-eDP bits
can't run without the AUX channel. We could come up a complicated
signaling scheme (have the MIPI-to-eDP bits return EPROBE_DEFER for a
while or wait on some sort of completion), but it seems simple enough
to just not even bother creating the bridge device until the AUX
channel probes. That's what we'll do.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.7.If89144992cb9d900f8c91a8d1817dbe00f543720@changeid

If panel-simple is instantiated as a DP AUX bus endpoint then we have
access to the DP AUX bus. Let's stash it in the panel-simple
structure, leaving it NULL for the cases where the panel is
instantiated in other ways.

If we happen to have access to the DP AUX bus and we weren't provided
the ddc-i2c-bus in some other manner, let's use the DP AUX bus for it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.6.I18e60221f6d048d14d6c50a770b15f356fa75092@changeid

The panel-simple driver can already have devices instantiated as
platform devices or MIPI DSI devices. Let's add a 3rd way to
instantiate it: as DP AUX endpoint devices.

At the moment there is no benefit to instantiating it in this way,
but:
- In the next patch we'll give it access to the DDC channel via the DP
  AUX bus.
- Possibly in the future we may use this channel to configure the
  backlight.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.5.Iada41f76a7342354bae929d0bb3ceba40f27f0ea@changeid

Historically "simple" eDP panels have been handled by panel-simple
which is a basic platform_device. In the device tree, the panel node
was at the top level and not connected to anything else.

Let's change it so that, instead, panels can be represented as being
children of the "DP AUX bus". Essentially we're saying that the
hierarchy that we're going to represent is the "control" connections
between devices. The DP AUX bus is a control bus provided by an eDP
controller (the parent) and consumed by a device like a panel (the
child).

The primary incentive here is to cleanly provide the panel driver the
ability to communicate over the AUX bus while handling lifetime issues
properly. The panel driver may want the AUX bus for controlling the
backlight or querying the panel's EDID.

The idea for this bus's design was hashed out over IRC [1].

[1] https://people.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/?channel=dri-devel&date=2021-05-11

Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org>
Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.4.I787c9ba09ed5ce12500326ded73a4f7c9265b1b3@changeid

The patch ("dt-bindings: drm: Introduce the DP AUX bus") talks about
how using the DP AUX bus is better than learning how to slice
bread. Let's add it to the ti-sn65dsi86 bindings.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.3.I98bf729846c37c4c143f6ab88b1e299280e2fe26@changeid

We want to be able to list an eDP panel as a child of an eDP
controller node to represent the fact that the panel is connected to
the controller's DP AUX bus. Though the panel and the controller are
connected in several ways, the DP AUX bus is the primary control
interface between the two and thus makes the most sense to model in
device tree hierarchy.

Listing a panel in this way makes it possible for the panel driver to
easily get access to the DP AUX bus that it resides on, which can be
useful to help in auto-detecting the panel and for turning on various
bits.

NOTE: historically eDP panels were _not_ listed under their controller
but were listed at the top level of the device tree. This will still
be supported for backward compatibility (and while DP controller
drivers are adapted to support the new DT syntax) but should be
considered deprecated since there is no downside to listing the panel
under the controller.

For now, the DP AUX bus bindings will only support an eDP panel
underneath. It's possible it could be extended to allow having a DP
connector under it in the future.

NOTE: there is no "Example" in this bindings file. Yikes! This avoids
duplicating the same example lots of places. See users of the aux bus
(like ti-sn65dsi86) for examples.

The idea for this bus's design was hashed out over IRC [1].

[1] https://people.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/?channel=dri-devel&date=2021-05-11Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.2.Id3c048d22e72a9f90084a543b5b4e3f43bc9ab62@changeid

The HPD (Hot Plug Detect) signal is present in many (probably even
"most") eDP panels. For eDP, this signal isn't actually used for
detecting hot-plugs of the panel but is more akin to a "panel ready"
signal. After you provide power to the panel, panel timing diagrams
typically say that you should wait for HPD to be asserted (or wait a
fixed amount of time) before talking to the panel.

The panel-simple bindings describes many eDP panels and many of these
panels provide the HPD signal. We should add the HPD-related
properties to the panel-simple bindings. The HPD properties are
actually defined in panel-common.yaml, so adding them here just
documents that they are OK for panels handled by the panel-simple
bindings.

NOTE: whether or not we'd include HPD properties in the panel node is
more a property of the board design than the panel itself. For most
boards using these eDP panels everything "magically" works without
specifying any HPD properties and that's been why we haven't needed to
allow the HPD properties earlier. On these boards the HPD signal goes
directly to a dedicated "HPD" input to the eDP controller and this
connection doesn't need to be described in the device tree. The only
time the HPD properties are needed in the device tree are if HPD is
hooked up to a GPIO or if HPD is normally on the panel but isn't used
on a given board. That means that if we don't allow the HPD properties
in panel-simple then one could argue that we've got to boot all eDP
panels (or at least all those that someone could conceivably put on a
system where HPD goes to a GPIO or isn't hooked up) from panel-simple.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.1.Ieb731d23680db4700cc41fe51ccc73ba0b785fb7@changeid

Fix the missing clk_disable_unprepare() before return
from panfrost_clk_init() in the error handling case.

Fixes: b681af0b ("drm: panfrost: add optional bus_clock")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608143856.4154766-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com

This adds a new driver for the Samsung DB7430 DPI display
controller as controlled over SPI.

Right now the only panel product we know that is using this
display controller is the LMS397KF04 but there may be more.

This is the first regular panel driver making use of the
MIPI DBI helper library. The DBI "device" portions can not
be used because that code assumes the use of a single
regulator and specific timings around the reset pulse that
do not match the DB7430 datasheet.

Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@tronnes.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610220527.366432-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org

In this patch we add a section to document what userspace should do to
find out the CRTC index. This is important as they may be many places in
the documentation that need this, so it's better to just point to this
section and avoid repetition.
Signed-off-by: Leandro Ribeiro <leandro.ribeiro@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210609230039.73307-2-leandro.ribeiro@collabora.com

Backmerging to pick up the latest TTM patches plus conflict resolution.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

TTMs buffer objects are based on GEM objects for quite a while
and rely on initializing those fields before initializing the TTM BO.

Nouveau now doesn't init the GEM object for internally allocated BOs,
so make sure that we at least initialize some necessary fields.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210609172902.1937-1-christian.koenig@amd.com

If the VMM's (Qemu) memory backend is backed up by memfd + Hugepages
(hugetlbfs and not THP), we have to first find the hugepage(s) where
the Guest allocations are located and then extract the regular 4k
sized subpages from them.

v2: Ensure that the subpage and hugepage offsets are calculated correctly
when the range of subpage allocations cuts across multiple hugepages.

v3: Instead of repeatedly looking up the hugepage for each subpage,
only do it when the subpage allocation crosses over into a different
hugepage. (suggested by Gerd and DW)

v4: Fix the following warning identified by checkpatch:
CHECK:OPEN_ENDED_LINE: Lines should not end with a '('

Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongwon Kim <dongwon.kim@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210609182915.592743-1-vivek.kasireddy@intel.com
[ kraxel: one more checkpatch format tweak ]
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Merge tag 'amd-drm-next-5.14-2021-06-09' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/agd5f/linux into drm-next

amd-drm-next-5.14-2021-06-09:

amdgpu:
- SR-IOV fixes
- Smartshift updates
- GPUVM TLB flush updates
- 16bpc fixed point display fix for DCE11
- BACO cleanups and core refactoring
- Aldebaran updates
- Initial Yellow Carp support
- RAS fixes
- PM API cleanup
- DC visual confirm updates
- DC DP MST fixes
- DC DML fixes
- Misc code cleanups and bug fixes

amdkfd:
- Initial Yellow Carp support

radeon:
- memcpy_to/from_io fixes

UAPI:
- Add Yellow Carp chip family id
  Used internally in the kernel driver and by mesa
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610031649.4006-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com

Cross-subsystem Changes:

-  x86/gpu: add JasperLake to gen11 early quirks
  (Although the patch lacks the Ack info, it has been Acked by Borislav)

Driver Changes:

- General DMC improves (Anusha)
- More ADL-P enabling (Vandita, Matt, Jose, Mika, Anusha, Imre, Lucas, Jani, Manasi, Ville, Stanislav)
- Introduce MBUS relative dbuf offset (Ville)
- PSR fixes and improvements (Gwan, Jose, Ville)
- Re-enable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV < 1.4 (Ville)
- Remove duplicated declarations (Shaokun, Wan)
- Check HDMI sink deep color capabilities during .mode_valid (Ville)
- Fix display flicker screan related to console and FBC (Chris)
- Remaining conversions of GRAPHICS_VER (Lucas)
- Drop invalid FIXME (Jose)
- Fix bigjoiner check in dsc_disable (Vandita)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/YMEy2Ew82BeL/hDK@intel.com

This fixes 32-bit arm build due to lack of 64-bit divides.

Fixes: cb1c8146 ("drm/ttm: flip the switch for driver allocated resources v2")
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/438442/Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Drop disabling of gfxoff during VCN use.  This allows gfxoff
to kick in and potentially save power if the user is not using
gfx for color space conversion or scaling.

VCN1.0 had a bug which prevented it from working properly with
gfxoff, so we disabled it while using VCN.  That said, most apps
today use gfx for scaling and color space conversion rather than
overlay planes so it was generally in use anyway. This was fixed
on VCN2+, but since we mostly use gfx for color space conversion
and scaling and rapidly powering up/down gfx can negate the
advantages of gfxoff, we left gfxoff disabled. As more
applications use overlay planes for color space conversion
and scaling, this starts to be a win, so go ahead and leave
gfxoff enabled.

Note that VCN1.0 uses vcn_v1_0_idle_work_handler() and
vcn_v1_0_ring_begin_use() so they are not affected by this
patch.
Reviewed-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Boyuan Zhang <Boyuan.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm-misc-next for 5.14:

UAPI Changes:

 * drm/panfrost: Export AFBC_FEATURES register to userspace

Cross-subsystem Changes:

 * dma-buf: Fix debug printing; Rename dma_resv_*() functions + changes
   in callers; Cleanups

Core Changes:

 * Add prefetching memcpy for WC

 * Avoid circular dependency on CONFIG_FB

 * Cleanups

 * Documentation fixes throughout DRM

 * ttm: Make struct ttm_resource the base of all managers + changes
   in all users of TTM; Add a generic memcpy for page-based iomem; Remove
   use of VM_MIXEDMAP; Cleanups

Driver Changes:

 * drm/bridge: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 + DT bindings

 * drm/hyperv: Add DRM driver for HyperV graphics output

 * drm/msm: Fix module dependencies

 * drm/panel: KD53T133: Support rotation

 * drm/pl111: Fix module dependencies

 * drm/qxl: Fixes

 * drm/stm: Cleanups

 * drm/sun4i: Be explicit about format modifiers

 * drm/vc4: Use struct gpio_desc; Cleanups

 * drm/vgem: Cleanups

 * drm/vmwgfx: Use ttm_bo_move_null() if there's nothing to copy

 * fbdev/mach64: Cleanups

 * fbdev/mb862xx: Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/YMBw3DF2b9udByfT@linux-uq9g

This adds support for controlling panel backlights over eDP using VESA's
standard backlight control interface. Luckily, Nvidia was cool enough to
never come up with their own proprietary backlight control interface (at
least, not any that I or the laptop manufacturers I've talked to are aware
of), so this should work for any laptop panels which support the VESA
backlight control interface.

Note that we don't yet provide the panel backlight frequency to the DRM DP
backlight helpers. This should be fine for the time being, since it's not
required to get basic backlight controls working.

For reference: there's some mentions of PWM backlight values in
nouveau_reg.h, but I'm not sure these are the values we would want to use.
If we figure out how to get this information in the future, we'll have the
benefit of more granular backlight control.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: greg.depoire@gmail.com
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-10-lyude@redhat.com

Since we're about to implement eDP backlight support in nouveau using the
standard protocol from VESA, we might as well just take the code that's
already written for this and move it into a set of shared DRM helpers.

Note that these helpers are intended to handle DPCD related backlight
control bits such as setting the brightness level over AUX, probing the
backlight's TCON, enabling/disabling the backlight over AUX if supported,
etc. Any PWM-related portions of backlight control are explicitly left up
to the driver, as these will vary from platform to platform.

The only exception to this is the calculation of the PWM frequency
pre-divider value. This is because the only platform-specific information
required for this is the PWM frequency of the panel, which the driver is
expected to provide if available. The actual algorithm for calculating this
value is standard and is defined in the eDP specification from VESA.

Note that these helpers do not yet implement the full range of features
the VESA backlight interface provides, and only provide the following
functionality (all of which was already present in i915's DPCD backlight
support):

* Basic control of brightness levels
* Basic probing of backlight capabilities
* Helpers for enabling and disabling the backlight

v3:
* Split out changes to i915's backlight code to separate patches to make it
  easier to review
v4:
* Style/spelling changes from Thomas Zimmermann
v5:
* Start using new drm_dbg_*() functions
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: greg.depoire@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-9-lyude@redhat.com

Also, stop printing the DPCD register that failed, and just describe it
instead. Saves us from having to look up each register offset when reading
through kernel logs (plus, DPCD dumping with drm.debug |= 0x100 will give
us that anyway).
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-8-lyude@redhat.com

If we can't read DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT in
intel_dp_aux_vesa_calc_max_backlight() but do have a valid PWM frequency
defined in the VBT, we'll keep going in the function until we inevitably
fail on reading DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_CAP_MIN. There's not much point in
doing this, so just return early.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-7-lyude@redhat.com

No functional changes, just move set_vesa_backlight_enable() closer to it's
only caller: intel_dp_aux_vesa_enable_backlight().
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-6-lyude@redhat.com

Since we're about to be moving this code into shared DRM helpers, we might
as well start to cache certain backlight capabilities that can be
determined from the EDP DPCD, and are likely to be relevant to the majority
of drivers using said helpers. The main purpose of this is just to prevent
every driver from having to check everything against the eDP DPCD using DP
macros, which makes the code slightly easier to read (especially since the
names of some of the eDP capabilities don't exactly match up with what we
actually need to use them for, like DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_BYTE_COUNT
for instance).
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-5-lyude@redhat.com

Get rid of the extraneous switch case in here, and just open code
edp_backlight_mode as we only ever use it once.

v4:
* Check that backlight mode is DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_DPCD, not
  DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_MASK - imirkin
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-4-lyude@redhat.com

This is kind of an annoying aspect of DRM's DP helpers:
drm_dp_dpcd_readb/writeb() return the size of bytes read/written on
success, thus we want to check against that instead of checking if the
return value is less than 0.

I'll probably be fixing this in the near future once I start doing DP work
again, also because I'd rather not mix a tree-wide refactor like that in
with a patch series intended to be around introducing DP backlight helpers.
So, for now let's just handle the return values from each function
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-3-lyude@redhat.com

Noticed this while moving all of the VESA backlight code in i915 over to
DRM helpers: it would appear that we calculate the frequency value we want
to write to DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_FREQ_SET twice even though this value never
actually changes during runtime. So, let's simplify things by just caching
this value in intel_panel.backlight, and re-writing it as-needed.

Changes since v1:
* Wrap panel->backlight.edp.vesa.pwm_freq_pre_divider in
  DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_FREQ_AUX_SET_CAP check - Jani
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: greg.depoire@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-2-lyude@redhat.com

We currently treat same slice mask as a same DBuf state and skip
updating the Dbuf slices, if we detect that.
This is wrong as if we have a multi to single pipe change or
vice versa, that would be treated as a same Dbuf state and thus
no changes required, so we don't get Mbus updated, causing issues.
Solution: check also mbus_join, in addition to slices mask.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210527110106.21434-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com

CDCLK crawl feature allows to change CDCLK frequency
without disabling the actual PLL and doesn't require
a full modeset.

v2: - Added has_cdclk_crawl as a feature flag to
      intel_device_info(Matt Roper)
    - s/gen13_cdclk_pll_crawl/adlp_cdclk_pll_crawl/
      (Matt Roper)

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210603065038.7298-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com

Fix the following sparse warnings generated by "make C=1":

drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:429:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:429:13:    expected unsigned short [assigned] [usertype] val
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:429:13:    got restricted __le16 [usertype]
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:432:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:432:13:    expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] val
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:432:13:    got restricted __le16 [usertype]
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:436:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:436:13:    expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] val
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:436:13:    got restricted __le16 [usertype]
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:438:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:438:13:    expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] val
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:438:13:    got restricted __le16 [usertype]
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:441:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:441:13:    expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] val
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:441:13:    got restricted __le16 [usertype]
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Valentin Raevsky <valentin@compulab.co.il>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608142211.82333-1-marex@denx.de

This change takes care of resetting the dss_ctl registers
in case of dsc_disable, bigjoiner disable and also
uncompressed joiner disable.

v2: Fix formatting
v3: Fix the typo (Mansi)
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Fixes: d961eb20 ("drm/i915/bigjoiner: atomic commit changes for uncompressed joiner")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3537Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210609065914.4454-1-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com

Use ttm_bo_move_null() instead of ttm_bo_assign_mem().
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608181306.90008-1-nirmoy.das@amd.comSigned-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

The object surf is not fully initialized and the uninitialized
field surf.data is being copied by the call to qxl_bo_create
via the call to qxl_gem_object_create. Set surf.data to zero
to ensure garbage data from the stack is not being copied.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
Fixes: f64122c1 ("drm: add new QXL driver. (v1.4)")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608161313.161922-1-colin.king@canonical.comSigned-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

AUX logic is often clocked from cdclk. Disable PSR to make sure
there are no hw initiated AUX transactions in flight while we
change the cdclk frequency.

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com

This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr
source when intel_psr is already enabled.

- intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state.
- intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state.

v2: Address Jose's review comment.
  - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable().
  - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle
    and WA for SelectiveFetch.
v3: Address Jose's review comment.
  - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked().
  - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked()
  - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the
    intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR.
v4: Address Jose's review comment.
  - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a
    scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause()
    for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable".

Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com