1. 31 Mar, 2023 4 commits
  2. 30 Mar, 2023 8 commits
    • David Vernet's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add testcases for ptr_*_or_null_ in bpf_kptr_xchg · 67efbd57
      David Vernet authored
      The second argument of the bpf_kptr_xchg() helper function is
      ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL. A recent patch fixed a bug whereby the
      verifier would fail with an internal error message if a program invoked
      the helper with a PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL register. This testcase
      adds some testcases to ensure that it fails gracefully moving forward.
      
      Before the fix, these testcases would have failed an error resembling
      the following:
      
      ; p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
      99: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r7       ; frame1: ...
      100: (bf) r1 = r10                    ; frame1: ...
      101: (07) r1 += -16                   ; frame1: ...
      ; p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
      102: (85) call bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire#13908
      ; frame1: R0_w=ptr_or_null_prog_test_ref_kfunc...
      ; p = bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->ref_ptr, p);
      103: (bf) r1 = r6                     ; frame1: ...
      104: (bf) r2 = r0
      ; frame1: R0_w=ptr_or_null_prog_test_ref_kfunc...
      105: (85) call bpf_kptr_xchg#194
      verifier internal error: invalid PTR_TO_BTF_ID register for type match
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Vernet <void@manifault.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230330145203.80506-2-void@manifault.com
      67efbd57
    • David Vernet's avatar
      bpf: Handle PTR_MAYBE_NULL case in PTR_TO_BTF_ID helper call arg · e4c2acab
      David Vernet authored
      When validating a helper function argument, we use check_reg_type() to
      ensure that the register containing the argument is of the correct type.
      When the register's base type is PTR_TO_BTF_ID, there is some
      supplemental logic where we do extra checks for various combinations of
      PTR_TO_BTF_ID type modifiers. For example, for PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
      PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED, and PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU, we call
      map_kptr_match_type() for bpf_kptr_xchg() calls, and
      btf_struct_ids_match() for other helper calls.
      
      When an unhandled PTR_TO_BTF_ID type modifier combination is passed to
      check_reg_type(), the verifier fails with an internal verifier error
      message. This can currently be triggered by passing a PTR_MAYBE_NULL
      pointer to helper functions (currently just bpf_kptr_xchg()) with an
      ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL arg type. For example, by callin
      bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->kptr, bpf_cpumask_create()).
      
      Whether or not passing a PTR_MAYBE_NULL arg to an
      ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL argument is valid is an interesting question.
      In a vacuum, it seems fine. A helper function with an
      ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL arg would seem to be implying that it can
      handle either a NULL or non-NULL arg, and has logic in place to detect
      and gracefully handle each. This is the case for bpf_kptr_xchg(), which
      of course simply does an xchg(). On the other hand, bpf_kptr_xchg() also
      specifies OBJ_RELEASE, and refcounting semantics for a PTR_MAYBE_NULL
      pointer is different than handling it for a NULL _OR_ non-NULL pointer.
      For example, with a non-NULL arg, we should always fail if there was not
      a nonzero refcount for the value in the register being passed to the
      helper. For PTR_MAYBE_NULL on the other hand, it's unclear. If the
      pointer is NULL it would be fine, but if it's not NULL, it would be
      incorrect to load the program.
      
      The current solution to this is to just fail if PTR_MAYBE_NULL is
      passed, and to instead require programs to have a NULL check to
      explicitly handle the NULL and non-NULL cases. This seems reasonable.
      Not only would it possibly be quite complicated to correctly handle
      PTR_MAYBE_NULL refcounting in the verifier, but it's also an arguably
      odd programming pattern in general to not explicitly handle the NULL
      case anyways. For example, it seems odd to not care about whether a
      pointer you're passing to bpf_kptr_xchg() was successfully allocated in
      a program such as the following:
      
      private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask;
      
      SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
      int BPF_PROG(example, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
      {
              struct bpf_cpumask *prev;
      
      	/* bpf_cpumask_create() returns PTR_MAYBE_NULL */
      	prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask, bpf_cpumask_create());
      	if (prev)
      		bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
      
      	return 0;
      }
      
      This patch therefore updates the verifier to explicitly check for
      PTR_MAYBE_NULL in check_reg_type(), and fail gracefully if it's
      observed. This isn't really "fixing" anything unsafe or incorrect. We're
      just updating the verifier to fail gracefully, and explicitly handle
      this pattern rather than unintentionally falling back to an internal
      verifier error path. A subsequent patch will update selftests.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Vernet <void@manifault.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230330145203.80506-1-void@manifault.com
      e4c2acab
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      veristat: change guess for __sk_buff from CGROUP_SKB to SCHED_CLS · d8161295
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      SCHED_CLS seems to be a better option as a default guess for freplace
      programs that have __sk_buff as a context type.
      Reported-by: default avatarEduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230330190115.3942962-1-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
      d8161295
    • Xu Kuohai's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Rewrite two infinite loops in bound check cases · 4ca13d10
      Xu Kuohai authored
      The two infinite loops in bound check cases added by commit
      1a3148fc ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range")
      increased the execution time of test_verifier from about 6 seconds to
      about 9 seconds. Rewrite these two infinite loops to finite loops to get
      rid of this extra time cost.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarXu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329011048.1721937-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      4ca13d10
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      Merge branch 'veristat: add better support of freplace programs' · 8a9abe02
      Alexei Starovoitov authored
      Andrii Nakryiko says:
      
      ====================
      
      Teach veristat how to deal with freplace BPF programs. As they can't be
      directly loaded by veristat without custom user-space part that sets correct
      target program FD, veristat always fails freplace programs. This patch set
      teaches veristat to guess target program type that will be inherited by
      freplace program itself, and subtitute it for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT (freplace) one
      for the purposes of BPF verification.
      
      Patch #1 fixes bug in libbpf preventing overriding freplace with specific
      program type.
      
      Patch #2 adds convenient -d flag to request veristat to emit libbpf debug
      logs. It help debugging why a specific BPF program fails to load, if the
      problem is not due to BPF verification itself.
      
      v3->v4:
        - fix optional kern_name check when guessing prog type (Alexei);
      v2->v3:
        - fix bpf_obj_id selftest that uses legacy bpf_prog_test_load() helper,
          which always sets program type programmatically; teach the helper to do it
          only if actually necessary (Stanislav);
      v1->v2:
        - fix compilation error reported by old GCC (my GCC v11 doesn't produce even
          a warning) and Clang (see CI failure at [0]):
      
      GCC version:
      
        veristat.c: In function ‘fixup_obj’:
        veristat.c:908:1: error: label at end of compound statement
          908 | skip_freplace_fixup:
              | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      
      Clang version:
      
        veristat.c:909:1: error: label at end of compound statement is a C2x extension [-Werror,-Wc2x-extensions]
        }
        ^
        1 error generated.
      
        [0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4515972059/jobs/7953845335
      ====================
      Acked-by: default avatarStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      8a9abe02
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      veristat: guess and substitue underlying program type for freplace (EXT) progs · fa7cc906
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      SEC("freplace") (i.e., BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) programs are not loadable as
      is through veristat, as kernel expects actual program's FD during
      BPF_PROG_LOAD time, which veristat has no way of knowing.
      
      Unfortunately, freplace programs are a pretty important class of
      programs, especially when dealing with XDP chaining solutions, which
      rely on EXT programs.
      
      So let's do our best and teach veristat to try to guess the original
      program type, based on program's context argument type. And if guessing
      process succeeds, we manually override freplace/EXT with guessed program
      type using bpf_program__set_type() setter to increase chances of proper
      BPF verification.
      
      We rely on BTF and maintain a simple lookup table. This process is
      obviously not 100% bulletproof, as valid program might not use context
      and thus wouldn't have to specify correct type. Also, __sk_buff is very
      ambiguous and is the context type across many different program types.
      We pick BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB for now, which seems to work fine in
      practice so far. Similarly, some program types require specifying attach
      type, and so we pick one out of possible few variants.
      
      Best effort at its best. But this makes veristat even more widely
      applicable.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Tested-by: default avatarEduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327185202.1929145-4-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      fa7cc906
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      veristat: add -d debug mode option to see debug libbpf log · b3c63d7a
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      Add -d option to allow requesting libbpf debug logs from veristat.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327185202.1929145-3-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      b3c63d7a
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      libbpf: disassociate section handler on explicit bpf_program__set_type() call · d6e6286a
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      If user explicitly overrides programs's type with
      bpf_program__set_type() API call, we need to disassociate whatever
      SEC_DEF handler libbpf determined initially based on program's SEC()
      definition, as it's not goind to be valid anymore and could lead to
      crashes and/or confusing failures.
      
      Also, fix up bpf_prog_test_load() helper in selftests/bpf, which is
      force-setting program type (even if that's completely unnecessary; this
      is quite a legacy piece of code), and thus should expect auto-attach to
      not work, yet one of the tests explicitly relies on auto-attach for
      testing.
      
      Instead, force-set program type only if it differs from the desired one.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327185202.1929145-2-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      d6e6286a
  3. 29 Mar, 2023 4 commits
  4. 28 Mar, 2023 4 commits
  5. 27 Mar, 2023 2 commits
  6. 26 Mar, 2023 18 commits