- 30 Jan, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Lionel Landwerlin authored
Could be helpful for debugging purposes. Signed-off-by:
Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
When we reset the engine, we first remove the guilty request from the active list. If it so happens that there is a pending preemption event to process before we handle the reset, when we inspect that event we find ourselves a little confused as we have bent the rules slightly to perform the reset. Just ignore any discrepancies inside reset, we know we'll start again from scratch afterwards. <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6..s1 537441383us : execlists_reset: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: reset for CS error <0>[ 536.940213] i915_sel-7302 2d..1 537441386us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: submit { 10c59:2*, 10c5a:2 } <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6d.s2 537471320us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: fence 10c59:2, current 1 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6d.s2 537471321us : execlists_hold: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: fence 10c59:2, current 1 on hold <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537471328us : intel_engine_reset: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: flags=10 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537471421us : execlists_reset_prepare: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: depth<-1 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537471422us : intel_engine_stop_cs: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537472424us : intel_engine_stop_cs: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: timed out on STOP_RING -> IDLE <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537472429us : __intel_gt_reset: 0000:00:02.0 engine_mask=4 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537472442us : execlists_reset_rewind: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472443us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: cs-irq head=4, tail=5 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472444us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: csb[5]: status=0x00008002:0x20000060 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472464us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: preempted { 10c59:2*, 0:0 } <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472465us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: promote { 10c59:2*, 10c5a:2 } <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472706us : assert_pending_valid: assert_pending_valid:1417 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq)) Signed-off-by:Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200129165935.1266132-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 29 Jan, 2020 12 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Now that we have offline error capture and can reset an engine from inside an atomic context while also preserving the GPU state for post-mortem analysis, it is time to handle error interrupts thrown by the command parser. This provides a much, much faster mechanism for us to detect known problems than using heartbeats/hangchecks, and also provides a mechanism for when those are disabled. However, it is limited to problems the HW can detect in the CS and so not a complete solution for detecting lockups. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We write to execlists->pending[0] in process_csb() to acknowledge the completion of the ESLP update, outside of the main spinlock. When we check the current status of the previous submission in __execlists_submission_tasklet() we should therefore use READ_ONCE() to reflect and document the unsynchronized read. Signed-off-by:
-
Matthew Auld authored
Measure the memcpy bw between our CPU accessible regions, trying all supported mapping combinations(WC, WB) across various sizes. v2: use smaller sizes throw in memcpy32/memcpy64/memcpy_from_wc Signed-off-by:Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
We've long had the more generic /dev/drm_dp_auxN devices for the same purpose. Drop the redundant and limited DPCD debugfs file. Reviewed-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117150551.9836-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by:
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
- 28 Jan, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Hold onto the vm->mutex (to lock the drm_mm) to ensure that the rbtree is stable as we search it for our scratch node. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Don't confuse the poor developer by writing a negative value as a very large positive, as the flow of requests is already complex enough. Reported-by:
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
The user (e.g. gem_eio) can manipulate the driver into wedging itself, allowing the user to trigger voluminous logging of inconsequential details. If we lift the dump to direct calls to intel_gt_set_wedged(), out of the intel_reset failure handling, we keep the detail logging for what we expect are true HW or test failures without being tricked. Reported-by:
Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We use the same interrupt mask for each engine, so define it once in a local and reuse. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We always use a deferred bottom-half (either tasklet or irq_work) for processing the response to an interrupt which means we can recombine the GT irq ack+handler into one. This simplicity is important in later patches as we will need to handle and then ack multiple interrupt levels before acking the GT and master interrupts. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We don't want to report errors on the internal contexts to userspace, suppressing their own, so treat them as simulated errors. These mostly arise inside selftests and so are simulated anyway. For the rest, we can rely on the normal debug channels in CI. Signed-off-by:
-
- 27 Jan, 2020 20 commits
-
-
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa authored
Engine context pinned in perf OA was set to same context id as the idle context. Set the context id to an unused value. Clear the sw context id field in lrc descriptor before ORing with ce->tag (Chris) Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/756Signed-off-by:
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Similar to commit ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") we have the same race of trying to pin the context underneath a mutex while allowing the decrement to be atomic outside of that mutex. This leads to the problem where two threads may simultaneously try to pin the context and the second not notice that they needed to repin the context. <2> [198.669621] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c:387! <4> [198.669703] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI <4> [198.669712] CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: gem_exec_create Tainted: G U W 5.5.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_7755+ #1 <4> [198.669723] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017 <4> [198.669776] RIP: 0010:timeline_advance+0x7b/0xe0 [i915] <4> [198.669785] Code: 00 48 c7 c2 10 f1 46 a0 48 c7 c7 70 1b 32 a0 e8 bb dd e7 e0 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 d1 af e7 e0 31 f6 bf 09 00 00 00 e8 35 ef d8 e0 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c1 48 fa 49 a0 ba 84 01 00 00 48 c7 c6 10 f1 46 a0 48 <4> [198.669803] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004c3a38 EFLAGS: 00010296 <4> [198.669810] RAX: ffff888270b35140 RBX: ffff88826f32ee00 RCX: 0000000000000006 <4> [198.669818] RDX: 00000000000017c5 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009 <4> [198.669826] RBP: ffffc900004c3a64 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 <4> [198.669834] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88826f9b5980 <4> [198.669841] R13: 0000000000000cc0 R14: ffffc900004c3dc0 R15: ffff888253610068 <4> [198.669849] FS: 00007f63e663fe40(0000) GS:ffff888276c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4> [198.669857] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4> [198.669864] CR2: 00007f171f8e39a8 CR3: 000000026b1f6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 <4> [198.669872] Call Trace: <4> [198.669924] intel_timeline_get_seqno+0x12/0x40 [i915] <4> [198.669977] __i915_request_create+0x76/0x5a0 [i915] <4> [198.670024] i915_request_create+0x86/0x1c0 [i915] <4> [198.670068] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xbf2/0x2500 [i915] <4> [198.670082] ? __lock_acquire+0x460/0x15d0 <4> [198.670128] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x470 [i915] <4> [198.670171] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] <4> [198.670181] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 <4> [198.670188] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [198.670233] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] Fixes: 84135022 ("drm/i915/gt: Drop mutex serialisation between context pin/unpin") References: ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
As a safety net, flush the engine verifications and restore the kernel context. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/971Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
The aux ch is used for more than DDC, so let's give it a better name. For maximum ease let's include both the AUX ch identifier and the port identifier (for cases where the VBT has redefined the relationship of the two). Signed-off-by:
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
To make it easier to figure out what caused a particular debug message let's print out aux->name. v2: Rebase for drm_err() & co. Add some punctuation to the messages (Matt) Signed-off-by: -
Chris Wilson authored
As we use a mutex to serialise the first acquire (as it may be a lengthy operation), but only an atomic decrement for the release, we have to be careful in case a second thread races and completes both acquire/release as the first finishes its acquire. Thread A Thread B i915_active_acquire i915_active_acquire atomic_read() == 0 atomic_read() == 0 mutex_lock() mutex_lock() atomic_read() == 0 ref->active(); atomic_inc() mutex_unlock() atomic_read() == 1 i915_active_release atomic_dec_and_test() -> 0 ref->retire() atomic_inc() -> 1 mutex_unlock() So thread A has acquired the ref->active_count but since the ref was still active at the time, it did not initialise it. By switching the check inside the mutex to an atomic increment only if already active, we close the race. Fixes: c9ad602f ("drm/i915: Split i915_active.mutex into an irq-safe spinlock for the rbtree") Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
