- 21 Jul, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] When running tests like generic/013 on test device with btrfs quota enabled, it can normally lead to data leak, detected at unmount time: BTRFS warning (device dm-3): qgroup 0/5 has unreleased space, type 0 rsv 4096 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 16386 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4142 close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs] RIP: 0010:close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs] Call Trace: btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110 kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0 deactivate_super+0x40/0x50 cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190 __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 task_work_run+0x64/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bc/0x1c0 __syscall_return_slowpath+0x47/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x64/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 ---[ end trace caf08beafeca2392 ]--- BTRFS error (device dm-3): qgroup reserved space leaked [CAUSE] In the offending case, the offending operations are: 2/6: writev f2X[269 1 0 0 0 0] [1006997,67,288] 0 2/7: truncate f2X[269 1 0 0 48 1026293] 18388 0 The following sequence of events could happen after the writev(): CPU1 (writeback) | CPU2 (truncate) ----------------------------------------------------------------- btrfs_writepages() | |- extent_write_cache_pages() | |- Got page for 1003520 | | 1003520 is Dirty, no writeback | | So (!clear_page_dirty_for_io()) | | gets called for it | |- Now page 1003520 is Clean. | | | btrfs_setattr() | | |- btrfs_setsize() | | |- truncate_setsize() | | New i_size is 18388 |- __extent_writepage() | | |- page_offset() > i_size | |- btrfs_invalidatepage() | |- Page is clean, so no qgroup | callback executed This means, the qgroup reserved data space is not properly released in btrfs_invalidatepage() as the page is Clean. [FIX] Instead of checking the dirty bit of a page, call btrfs_qgroup_free_data() unconditionally in btrfs_invalidatepage(). As qgroup rsv are completely bound to the QGROUP_RESERVED bit of io_tree, not bound to page status, thus we won't cause double freeing anyway. Fixes: 0b34c261 ("btrfs: qgroup: Prevent qgroup->reserved from going subzero") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by:Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
At btrfs_find_all_roots_safe() we allocate a ulist and set the **roots argument to point to it. However if later we fail due to an error returned by find_parent_nodes(), we free that ulist but leave a dangling pointer in the **roots argument. Upon receiving the error, a caller of this function can attempt to free the same ulist again, resulting in an invalid memory access. One such scenario is during qgroup accounting: btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() --> calls btrfs_find_all_roots() passes &new_roots (a stack allocated pointer) to btrfs_find_all_roots() --> btrfs_find_all_roots() just calls btrfs_find_all_roots_safe() passing &new_roots to it --> allocates ulist and assigns its address to **roots (which points to new_roots from btrfs_qgroup_account_extents()) --> find_parent_nodes() returns an error, so we free the ulist and leave **roots pointing to it after returning --> btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() sees btrfs_find_all_roots() returned an error and jumps to the label 'cleanup', which just tries to free again the same ulist Stack trace example: ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: tree first key check failed WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1763215 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:422 btrfs_verify_level_key+0xe0/0x180 [btrfs] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...) CPU: 1 PID: 1763215 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.8.0-rc3-btrfs-next-64 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_verify_level_key+0xe0/0x180 [btrfs] Code: 28 5b 5d (...) RSP: 0018:ffffb89b473779a0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff90397759bf08 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff9039a419c000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffb89b43301000 R12: 000000000000005e R13: ffffb89b47377a2e R14: ffffb89b473779af R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fc47e1e1000(0000) GS:ffff9039ac200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fc47e1df000 CR3: 00000003d9e4e001 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: read_block_for_search+0xf6/0x350 [btrfs] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x242/0x650 [btrfs] resolve_indirect_refs+0x7cf/0x9e0 [btrfs] find_parent_nodes+0x4ea/0x12c0 [btrfs] btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xbf/0x130 [btrfs] btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x9d/0x390 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4f7/0xb20 [btrfs] btrfs_sync_file+0x3d4/0x4d0 [btrfs] do_fsync+0x38/0x70 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fc47e2d72e3 Code: Bad RIP value. RSP: 002b:00007fffa32098c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fc47e2d72e3 RDX: 00007fffa3209830 RSI: 00007fffa3209830 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 000000000000072e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000003e8 R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007fffa3209970 R15: 00005607c4ac8b50 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb8eb5e85>] copy_process+0x755/0x1eb0 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb8eb5e85>] copy_process+0x755/0x1eb0 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace 8639237550317b48 ]--- BTRFS error (device sdc): tree first key mismatch detected, bytenr=62324736 parent_transid=94 key expected=(262,108,1351680) has=(259,108,1921024) general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI CPU: 2 PID: 1763215 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.8.0-rc3-btrfs-next-64 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ulist_release+0x14/0x60 [btrfs] Code: c7 07 00 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffb89b47377d60 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff903959b56b90 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000270024 RDI: ffff9036e2adc840 RBP: ffff9036e2adc848 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9036e2adc840 R13: 0000000000000015 R14: ffff9039a419ccf8 R15: ffff90395d605840 FS: 00007fc47e1e1000(0000) GS:ffff9039ac600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f8c1c0a51c8 CR3: 00000003d9e4e004 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ulist_free+0x13/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0xf3/0x390 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4f7/0xb20 [btrfs] btrfs_sync_file+0x3d4/0x4d0 [btrfs] do_fsync+0x38/0x70 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fc47e2d72e3 Code: Bad RIP value. RSP: 002b:00007fffa32098c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fc47e2d72e3 RDX: 00007fffa3209830 RSI: 00007fffa3209830 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 000000000000072e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000003e8 R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007fffa3209970 R15: 00005607c4ac8b50 Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...) ---[ end trace 8639237550317b49 ]--- RIP: 0010:ulist_release+0x14/0x60 [btrfs] Code: c7 07 00 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffb89b47377d60 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff903959b56b90 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000270024 RDI: ffff9036e2adc840 RBP: ffff9036e2adc848 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9036e2adc840 R13: 0000000000000015 R14: ffff9039a419ccf8 R15: ffff90395d605840 FS: 00007fc47e1e1000(0000) GS:ffff9039ad200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f6a776f7d40 CR3: 00000003d9e4e002 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots_safe() set *roots to NULL after it frees the ulist. Fixes: 8da6d581 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 09 Jul, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
btrfs implements the iter_write op and thus can use the more efficient iov_iter based splice implementation. For now falling back to the less efficient default is pretty harmless, but I have a pending series that removes the default, and thus would cause btrfs to not support splice at all. Reported-by:
Andy Lavr <andy.lavr@gmail.com> Tested-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
While debugging a patch that I wrote I was hitting use-after-free panics when accessing block groups on unmount. This turned out to be because in the nocow case if we bail out of doing the nocow for whatever reason we need to call btrfs_dec_nocow_writers() if we called the inc. This puts our block group, but a few error cases does if (nocow) { btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(); goto error; } unfortunately, error is error: if (nocow) btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(); so we get a double put on our block group. Fix this by dropping the error cases calling of btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(), as it's handled at the error label now. Fixes: 762bf098 ("btrfs: improve error handling in run_delalloc_nocow") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
- 07 Jul, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following small test script can trigger ASSERT() at unmount time: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt mount -o remount,discard=async $mnt umount $mnt The call trace: assertion failed: atomic_read(&block_group->count) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3431 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3204! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 4 PID: 10389 Comm: umount Tainted: G O 5.8.0-rc3-custom+ #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: btrfs_free_block_groups.cold+0x22/0x55 [btrfs] close_ctree+0x2cb/0x323 [btrfs] btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110 kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0 deactivate_super+0x40/0x50 cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190 __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 task_work_run+0x64/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bc/0x1c0 __syscall_return_slowpath+0x47/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x64/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The code: ASSERT(atomic_read(&block_group->count) == 1); btrfs_put_block_group(block_group); [CAUSE] Obviously it's some btrfs_get_block_group() call doesn't get its put call. The offending btrfs_get_block_group() happens here: void btrfs_mark_bg_unused(struct btrfs_block_group *bg) { if (list_empty(&bg->bg_list)) { btrfs_get_block_group(bg); list_add_tail(&bg->bg_list, &fs_info->unused_bgs); } } So every call sites removing the block group from unused_bgs list should reduce the ref count of that block group. However for async discard, it didn't follow the call convention: void btrfs_discard_punt_unused_bgs_list(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) { list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, next, &fs_info->unused_bgs, bg_list) { list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list); btrfs_discard_queue_work(&fs_info->discard_ctl, block_group); } } And in btrfs_discard_queue_work(), it doesn't call btrfs_put_block_group() either. [FIX] Fix the problem by reducing the reference count when we grab the block group from unused_bgs list. Reported-by:Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Fixes: 6e80d4f8 ("btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.6+ Tested-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 02 Jul, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
Eric reported an issue where mounting -o recovery with a fuzzed fs resulted in a kernel panic. This is because we tried to free the tree node, except it was an error from the read. Fix this by properly resetting the tree_root->node == NULL in this case. The panic was the following BTRFS warning (device loop0): failed to read tree root BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001f RIP: 0010:free_extent_buffer+0xe/0x90 [btrfs] Call Trace: free_root_extent_buffers.part.0+0x11/0x30 [btrfs] free_root_pointers+0x1a/0xa2 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x1776/0x18a5 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x13/0xfa [btrfs] ? selinux_fs_context_parse_param+0x37/0x80 legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x30 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x147/0x3e0 [btrfs] ? cred_has_capability+0x7c/0x120 ? legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0 do_mount+0x735/0xa40 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Nik says: this is problematic only if we fail on the last iteration of the loop as this results in init_tree_roots returning err value with tree_root->node = -ERR. Subsequently the caller does: fail_tree_roots which calls free_root_pointers on the bogus value. Reported-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Fixes: b8522a1e ("btrfs: Factor out tree roots initialization during mount") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+ Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Commit 7f9fe614 ("btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic"), added in the 5.8 merge window, introduced another leak for the space_info's reclaim_size counter. This is very often triggered by the test cases generic/269 and generic/416 from fstests, producing a stack trace like the following during unmount: [37079.155499] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [37079.156844] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2000423 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3422 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2eb/0x300 [btrfs] [37079.158090] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot btrfs dm_thin_pool (...) [37079.164440] CPU: 2 PID: 2000423 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc7-btrfs-next-62 #1 [37079.165422] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), (...) [37079.167384] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2eb/0x300 [btrfs] [37079.168375] Code: bd 58 ff ff ff 00 4c 8d (...) [37079.170199] RSP: 0018:ffffaa53875c7de0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [37079.171120] RAX: ffff98099e701cf8 RBX: ffff98099e2d4000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [37079.172057] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffc0acc5b1 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [37079.173002] RBP: ffff98099e701cf8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [37079.173886] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff98099e701c00 [37079.174730] R13: ffff98099e2d5100 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100 [37079.175578] FS: 00007f4d7d0a5840(0000) GS:ffff9809ec600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [37079.176434] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [37079.177289] CR2: 0000559224dcc000 CR3: 000000012207a004 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [37079.178152] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [37079.178935] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [37079.179675] Call Trace: [37079.180419] close_ctree+0x291/0x2d1 [btrfs] [37079.181162] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 [37079.181898] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [37079.182641] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [37079.183371] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0x70 [37079.184012] cleanup_mnt+0x100/0x160 [37079.184650] task_work_run+0x68/0xb0 [37079.185284] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf9/0x100 [37079.185920] do_syscall_64+0x20d/0x260 [37079.186556] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [37079.187197] RIP: 0033:0x7f4d7d2d9357 [37079.187836] Code: eb 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 (...) [37079.189180] RSP: 002b:00007ffee4e0d368 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [37079.189845] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f4d7d3fb224 RCX: 00007f4d7d2d9357 [37079.190515] RDX: ffffffffffffff78 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000559224dc5c90 [37079.191173] RBP: 0000559224dc1970 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffee4e0c0e0 [37079.191815] R10: 0000559224dc7b00 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [37079.192451] R13: 0000559224dc5c90 R14: 0000559224dc1a80 R15: 0000559224dc1ba0 [37079.193096] irq event stamp: 0 [37079.193729] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [37079.194379] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff97ab8935>] copy_process+0x755/0x1ea0 [37079.195033] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff97ab8935>] copy_process+0x755/0x1ea0 [37079.195700] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [37079.196318] ---[ end trace b32710d864dea887 ]--- In the past commit d611add4 ("btrfs: fix reclaim counter leak of space_info objects") fixed similar cases. That commit however has a date more recent (April 7 2020) then the commit mentioned before (March 13 2020), however it was merged in kernel 5.7 while the older commit, which introduces a new leak, was merged only in the 5.8 merge window. So the leak sneaked in unnoticed. Fix this by making steal_from_global_rsv() remove the ticket using the helper remove_ticket(), which decrements the reclaim_size counter of the space_info object. Fixes: 7f9fe614 ("btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic") Signed-off-by:
-
Boris Burkov authored
Under somewhat convoluted conditions, it is possible to attempt to release an extent_buffer that is under io, which triggers a BUG_ON in btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages. This relies on a few different factors. First, extent_buffer reads done as readahead for searching use WAIT_NONE, so they free the local extent buffer reference while the io is outstanding. However, they should still be protected by TREE_REF. However, if the system is doing signficant reclaim, and simultaneously heavily accessing the extent_buffers, it is possible for releasepage to race with two concurrent readahead attempts in a way that leaves TREE_REF unset when the readahead extent buffer is released. Essentially, if two tasks race to allocate a new extent_buffer, but the winner who attempts the first io is rebuffed by a page being locked (likely by the reclaim itself) then the loser will still go ahead with issuing the readahead. The loser's call to find_extent_buffer must also race with the reclaim task reading the extent_buffer's refcount as 1 in a way that allows the reclaim to re-clear the TREE_REF checked by find_extent_buffer. The following represents an example execution demonstrating the race: CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 reada_for_search reada_for_search readahead_tree_block readahead_tree_block find_create_tree_block find_create_tree_block alloc_extent_buffer alloc_extent_buffer find_extent_buffer // not found allocates eb lock pages associate pages to eb insert eb into radix tree set TREE_REF, refs == 2 unlock pages read_extent_buffer_pages // WAIT_NONE not uptodate (brand new eb) lock_page if !trylock_page goto unlock_exit // not an error free_extent_buffer release_extent_buffer atomic_dec_and_test refs to 1 find_extent_buffer // found try_release_extent_buffer take refs_lock reads refs == 1; no io atomic_inc_not_zero refs to 2 mark_buffer_accessed check_buffer_tree_ref // not STALE, won't take refs_lock refs == 2; TREE_REF set // no action read_extent_buffer_pages // WAIT_NONE clear TREE_REF release_extent_buffer atomic_dec_and_test refs to 1 unlock_page still not uptodate (CPU1 read failed on trylock_page) locks pages set io_pages > 0 submit io return free_extent_buffer release_extent_buffer dec refs to 0 delete from radix tree btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages BUG_ON(io_pages > 0)!!! We observe this at a very low rate in production and were also able to reproduce it in a test environment by introducing some spurious delays and by introducing probabilistic trylock_page failures. To fix it, we apply check_tree_ref at a point where it could not possibly be unset by a competing task: after io_pages has been incremented. All the codepaths that clear TREE_REF check for io, so they would not be able to clear it after this point until the io is done. Stack trace, for reference: [1417839.424739] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1417839.435328] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4841! [1417839.447024] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [1417839.502972] RIP: 0010:btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0x20/0x1f0 [1417839.517008] Code: ed e9 ... [1417839.558895] RSP: 0018:ffffc90020bcf798 EFLAGS: 00010202 [1417839.570816] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff888102d6def0 RCX: 0000000000000028 [1417839.586962] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffff8887f0296482 RDI: ffff888102d6def0 [1417839.603108] RBP: ffff88885664a000 R08: 0000000000000046 R09: 0000000000000238 [1417839.619255] R10: 0000000000000028 R11: ffff88885664af68 R12: 0000000000000000 [1417839.635402] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88875f573ad0 R15: ffff888797aafd90 [1417839.651549] FS: 00007f5a844fa700(0000) GS:ffff88885f680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1417839.669810] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1417839.682887] CR2: 00007f7884541fe0 CR3: 000000049f609002 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [1417839.699037] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1417839.715187] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1417839.731320] Call Trace: [1417839.737103] release_extent_buffer+0x39/0x90 [1417839.746913] read_block_for_search.isra.38+0x2a3/0x370 [1417839.758645] btrfs_search_slot+0x260/0x9b0 [1417839.768054] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x4a/0x70 [1417839.778427] btrfs_get_extent+0x15f/0x830 [1417839.787665] ? submit_extent_page+0xc4/0x1c0 [1417839.797474] ? __do_readpage+0x299/0x7a0 [1417839.806515] __do_readpage+0x33b/0x7a0 [1417839.815171] ? btrfs_releasepage+0x70/0x70 [1417839.824597] extent_readpages+0x28f/0x400 [1417839.833836] read_pages+0x6a/0x1c0 [1417839.841729] ? startup_64+0x2/0x30 [1417839.849624] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x13c/0x1a0 [1417839.860590] filemap_fault+0x6c7/0x990 [1417839.869252] ? xas_load+0x8/0x80 [1417839.876756] ? xas_find+0x150/0x190 [1417839.884839] ? filemap_map_pages+0x295/0x3b0 [1417839.894652] __do_fault+0x32/0x110 [1417839.902540] __handle_mm_fault+0xacd/0x1000 [1417839.912156] handle_mm_fault+0xaa/0x1c0 [1417839.921004] __do_page_fault+0x242/0x4b0 [1417839.930044] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30 [1417839.937933] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [1417839.945631] RIP: 0033:0x33c4bae [1417839.952927] Code: Bad RIP value. [1417839.960411] RSP: 002b:00007f5a844f7350 EFLAGS: 00010206 [1417839.972331] RAX: 000000000000006e RBX: 1614b3ff6a50398a RCX: 0000000000000000 [1417839.988477] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000002 [1417840.004626] RBP: 00007f5a844f7420 R08: 000000000000006e R09: 00007f5a94aeccb8 [1417840.020784] R10: 00007f5a844f7350 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f5a94aecc79 [1417840.036932] R13: 00007f5a94aecc78 R14: 00007f5a94aecc90 R15: 00007f5a94aecc40 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by:
-
Marcos Paulo de Souza authored
Convert fall through comments to the pseudo-keyword which is now the preferred way. Signed-off-by:
-
- 16 Jun, 2020 10 commits
-
-
Waiman Long authored
In btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info(), there is a classic case where kzalloc() was incorrectly paired with kzfree(). According to David Sterba, there isn't any sensitive information in the subvol_info that needs to be cleared before freeing. So kzfree() isn't really needed, use kfree() instead. Signed-off-by:
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
A RWF_NOWAIT write is not supposed to wait on filesystem locks that can be held for a long time or for ongoing IO to complete. However when calling check_can_nocow(), if the inode has prealloc extents or has the NOCOW flag set, we can block on extent (file range) locks through the call to btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(). Such lock can take a significant amount of time to be available. For example, a fiemap task may be running, and iterating through the entire file range checking all extents and doing backref walking to determine if they are shared, or a readpage operation may be in progress. Also at btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(), called by check_can_nocow(), after locking the file range we wait for any existing ordered extent that is in progress to complete. Another operation that can take a significant amount of time and defeat the purpose of RWF_NOWAIT. So fix this by trying to lock the file range and if it's currently locked return -EAGAIN to user space. If we are able to lock the file range without waiting and there is an ordered extent in the range, return -EAGAIN as well, instead of waiting for it to complete. Finally, don't bother trying to lock the snapshot lock of the root when attempting a RWF_NOWAIT write, as that is only important for buffered writes. Fixes: edf064e7 ("btrfs: nowait aio support") Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we attempt to do a RWF_NOWAIT write against a file range for which we can only do NOCOW for a part of it, due to the existence of holes or shared extents for example, we proceed with the write as if it were possible to NOCOW the whole range. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/sdj/bar $ chattr +C /mnt/sdj/bar $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 256K 0 256K" /mnt/bar wrote 262144/262144 bytes at offset 0 256 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0003 sec (694.444 MiB/sec and 2777.7778 ops/sec) $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 64K 64K" /mnt/bar $ sync $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -N -V 1 -b 128K -S 0xfe 0 128K" /mnt/bar wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0 128 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0007 sec (160.051 MiB/sec and 1280.4097 ops/sec) This last write should fail with -EAGAIN since the file range from 64K to 128K is a hole. On xfs it fails, as expected, but on ext4 it currently succeeds because apparently it is expensive to check if there are extents allocated for the whole range, but I'll check with the ext4 people. Fix the issue by checking if check_can_nocow() returns a number of NOCOW'able bytes smaller then the requested number of bytes, and if it does return -EAGAIN. Fixes: edf064e7 ("btrfs: nowait aio support") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we attempt to write to prealloc extent located after eof using a RWF_NOWAIT write, we always fail with -EAGAIN. We do actually check if we have an allocated extent for the write at the start of btrfs_file_write_iter() through a call to check_can_nocow(), but later when we go into the actual direct IO write path we simply return -EAGAIN if the write starts at or beyond EOF. Trivial to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/foo $ chattr +C /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" /mnt/foo wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0 64 KiB, 16 ops; 0.0004 sec (135.575 MiB/sec and 34707.1584 ops/sec) $ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 64K 1M" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -N -V 1 -S 0xfe -b 64K 64K 64K" /mnt/foo pwrite: Resource temporarily unavailable On xfs and ext4 the write succeeds, as expected. Fix this by removing the wrong check at btrfs_direct_IO(). Fixes: edf064e7 ("btrfs: nowait aio support") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we do a successful RWF_NOWAIT write we end up locking the snapshot lock of the inode, through a call to check_can_nocow(), but we never unlock it. This means the next attempt to create a snapshot on the subvolume will hang forever. Trivial reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/foobar $ chattr +C /mnt/foobar $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" /mnt/foobar $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -N -V 1 -S 0xfe 0 64K" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap --> hangs Fix this by unlocking the snapshot lock if check_can_nocow() returned success. Fixes: edf064e7 ("btrfs: nowait aio support") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
This brings back an optimization that commit e678934c ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans") removed, but in a different form. So it's almost equivalent to a revert. That commit removed an optimization where we avoid locking a root's log_mutex when there is no log tree created in the current transaction. The affected code path is triggered through unlink operations. That commit was based on the assumption that the optimization was not necessary because we used to have the following checks when the patch was authored: int btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log(...) { (...) if (dir->logged_trans < trans->transid) return 0; ret = join_running_log_trans(root); (...) } int btrfs_del_inode_ref_in_log(...) { (...) if (inode->logged_trans < trans->transid) return 0; ret = join_running_log_trans(root); (...) } However before that patch was merged, another patch was merged first which replaced those checks because they were buggy. That other patch corresponds to commit 803f0f64 ("Btrfs: fix fsync not persisting dentry deletions due to inode evictions"). The assumption that if the logged_trans field of an inode had a smaller value then the current transaction's generation (transid) meant that the inode was not logged in the current transaction was only correct if the inode was not evicted and reloaded in the current transaction. So the corresponding bug fix changed those checks and replaced them with the following helper function: static bool inode_logged(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_inode *inode) { if (inode->logged_trans == trans->transid) return true; if (inode->last_trans == trans->transid && test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC, &inode->runtime_flags) && !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &trans->fs_info->flags)) return true; return false; } So if we have a subvolume without a log tree in the current transaction (because we had no fsyncs), every time we unlink an inode we can end up trying to lock the log_mutex of the root through join_running_log_trans() twice, once for the inode being unlinked (by btrfs_del_inode_ref_in_log()) and once for the parent directory (with btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log()). This means if we have several unlink operations happening in parallel for inodes in the same subvolume, and the those inodes and/or their parent inode were changed in the current transaction, we end up having a lot of contention on the log_mutex. The test robots from intel reported a -30.7% performance regression for a REAIM test after commit e678934c ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans"). So just bring back the optimization to join_running_log_trans() where we check first if a log root exists before trying to lock the log_mutex. This is done by checking for a bit that is set on the root when a log tree is created and removed when a log tree is freed (at transaction commit time). Commit e678934c ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans") was merged in the 5.4 merge window while commit 803f0f64 ("Btrfs: fix fsync not persisting dentry deletions due to inode evictions") was merged in the 5.3 merge window. But the first commit was actually authored before the second commit (May 23 2019 vs June 19 2019). Reported-by:
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200611090233.GL12456@shao2-debian/ Fixes: e678934c ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When balance and scrub are running in parallel it is possible to end up with an underflow of the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info object, which triggers a warning like the following: [134243.793196] BTRFS info (device sdc): relocating block group 1104150528 flags data [134243.806891] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [134243.807561] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26884 at fs/btrfs/space-info.h:125 btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x1da/0x280 [btrfs] [134243.808819] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor (...) [134243.815779] CPU: 1 PID: 26884 Comm: kworker/u8:8 Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5 [134243.816944] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [134243.818389] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-108483) [134243.819186] RIP: 0010:btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x1da/0x280 [btrfs] [134243.819963] Code: 0b f2 85 (...) [134243.822271] RSP: 0018:ffffa4160aae7510 EFLAGS: 00010287 [134243.822929] RAX: 000000000000c000 RBX: ffff96159a8c1000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [134243.823816] RDX: 0000000000008000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff96158067a810 [134243.824742] RBP: ffff96158067a800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [134243.825636] R10: ffff961501432a40 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000000000c000 [134243.826532] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffffffffff4000 R15: ffff96158067a810 [134243.827432] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9615baa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [134243.828451] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [134243.829184] CR2: 000055bd7e414000 CR3: 00000001077be004 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [134243.830083] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [134243.830975] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [134243.831867] Call Trace: [134243.832211] find_free_extent+0x4a0/0x16c0 [btrfs] [134243.832846] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x91/0x180 [btrfs] [134243.833487] cow_file_range+0x12d/0x490 [btrfs] [134243.834080] fallback_to_cow+0x82/0x1b0 [btrfs] [134243.834689] ? release_extent_buffer+0x121/0x170 [btrfs] [134243.835370] run_delalloc_nocow+0x33f/0xa30 [btrfs] [134243.836032] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x1ea/0x6d0 [btrfs] [134243.836725] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x221/0x250 [btrfs] [134243.837450] writepage_delalloc+0xe8/0x150 [btrfs] [134243.838059] __extent_writepage+0xe8/0x4c0 [btrfs] [134243.838674] extent_write_cache_pages+0x237/0x530 [btrfs] [134243.839364] extent_writepages+0x44/0xa0 [btrfs] [134243.839946] do_writepages+0x23/0x80 [134243.840401] __writeback_single_inode+0x59/0x700 [134243.841006] writeback_sb_inodes+0x267/0x5f0 [134243.841548] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x87/0xe0 [134243.842091] wb_writeback+0x382/0x590 [134243.842574] ? wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0 [134243.843030] wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0 [134243.843468] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [134243.843978] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [134243.844452] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [134243.844981] kthread+0x103/0x140 [134243.845400] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [134243.846030] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [134243.846494] irq event stamp: 0 [134243.846892] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [134243.847682] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 [134243.848687] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 [134243.849913] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [134243.850698] ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a96 ]--- [134243.851335] ------------[ cut here ]------------ When relocating a data block group, for each extent allocated in the block group we preallocate another extent with the same size for the data relocation inode (we do it at prealloc_file_extent_cluster()). We reserve space by calling btrfs_check_data_free_space(), which ends up incrementing the data space_info's bytes_may_use counter, and then call btrfs_prealloc_file_range() to allocate the extent, which always decrements the bytes_may_use counter by the same amount. The expectation is that writeback of the data relocation inode always follows a NOCOW path, by writing into the preallocated extents. However, when starting writeback we might end up falling back into the COW path, because the block group that contains the preallocated extent was turned into RO mode by a scrub running in parallel. The COW path then calls the extent allocator which ends up calling btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), and this function decrements the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info object by an amount corresponding to the size of the allocated extent, despite we haven't previously incremented it. When the counter currently has a value smaller then the allocated extent we reset the counter to 0 and emit a warning, otherwise we just decrement it and slowly mess up with this counter which is crucial for space reservation, the end result can be granting reserved space to tasks when there isn't really enough free space, and having the tasks fail later in critical places where error handling consists of a transaction abort or hitting a BUG_ON(). Fix this by making sure that if we fallback to the COW path for a data relocation inode, we increment the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info object. The COW path will then decrement it at btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() on success or through its error handling part by a call to extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() (which ends up calling btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() that does the decrement operation) in case of an error. Test case btrfs/061 from fstests could sporadically trigger this. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When running relocation of a data block group while scrub is running in parallel, it is possible that the relocation will fail and abort the current transaction with an -EINVAL error: [134243.988595] BTRFS info (device sdc): found 14 extents, stage: move data extents [134243.999871] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [134244.000741] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -22) [134244.001692] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26954 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1071 __btrfs_cow_block+0x6a7/0x790 [btrfs] [134244.003380] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor raid6_pq (...) [134244.012577] CPU: 0 PID: 26954 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5 [134244.014162] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [134244.016184] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_cow_block+0x6a7/0x790 [btrfs] [134244.017151] Code: 48 c7 c7 (...) [134244.020549] RSP: 0018:ffffa41607863888 EFLAGS: 00010286 [134244.021515] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9614bdfe09c8 RCX: 0000000000000000 [134244.022822] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffb3d63980 RDI: 0000000000000001 [134244.024124] RBP: ffff961589e8c000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [134244.025424] R10: ffffffffc0ae5955 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614bd530d08 [134244.026725] R13: ffff9614ced41b88 R14: ffff9614bdfe2a48 R15: 0000000000000000 [134244.028024] FS: 00007f29b63c08c0(0000) GS:ffff9615ba600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [134244.029491] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [134244.030560] CR2: 00007f4eb339b000 CR3: 0000000130d6e006 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [134244.031997] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [134244.033153] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [134244.034484] Call Trace: [134244.034984] btrfs_cow_block+0x12b/0x2b0 [btrfs] [134244.035859] do_relocation+0x30b/0x790 [btrfs] [134244.036681] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [134244.037460] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [134244.038235] relocate_tree_blocks+0x37b/0x730 [btrfs] [134244.039245] relocate_block_group+0x388/0x770 [btrfs] [134244.040228] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x161/0x2e0 [btrfs] [134244.041323] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x36/0x110 [btrfs] [134244.041345] btrfs_balance+0xc06/0x1860 [btrfs] [134244.043382] ? btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x27c/0x310 [btrfs] [134244.045586] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x1ed/0x310 [btrfs] [134244.045611] btrfs_ioctl+0x1880/0x3760 [btrfs] [134244.049043] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [134244.049838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [134244.050587] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x11b3/0x14b0 [134244.051417] ? ksys_ioctl+0x92/0xb0 [134244.052070] ksys_ioctl+0x92/0xb0 [134244.052701] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [134244.053511] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [134244.054206] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280 [134244.054891] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [134244.055819] RIP: 0033:0x7f29b51c9dd7 [134244.056491] Code: 00 00 00 (...) [134244.059767] RSP: 002b:00007ffcccc1dd08 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [134244.061168] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f29b51c9dd7 [134244.062474] RDX: 00007ffcccc1dda0 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003 [134244.063771] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 00005565cea4b000 R09: 0000000000000000 [134244.065032] R10: 0000000000000541 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffcccc2060a [134244.066327] R13: 00007ffcccc1dda0 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00007ffcccc1dec0 [134244.067626] irq event stamp: 0 [134244.068202] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [134244.069351] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 [134244.070909] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 [134244.072392] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [134244.073432] ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a99 ]--- The -EINVAL error comes from the following chain of function calls: __btrfs_cow_block() <-- aborts the transaction btrfs_reloc_cow_block() replace_file_extents() get_new_location() <-- returns -EINVAL When relocating a data block group, for each allocated extent of the block group, we preallocate another extent (at prealloc_file_extent_cluster()), associated with the data relocation inode, and then dirty all its pages. These preallocated extents have, and must have, the same size that extents from the data block group being relocated have. Later before we start the relocation stage that updates pointers (bytenr field of file extent items) to point to the the new extents, we trigger writeback for the data relocation inode. The expectation is that writeback will write the pages to the previously preallocated extents, that it follows the NOCOW path. That is generally the case, however, if a scrub is running it may have turned the block group that contains those extents into RO mode, in which case writeback falls back to the COW path. However in the COW path instead of allocating exactly one extent with the expected size, the allocator may end up allocating several smaller extents due to free space fragmentation - because we tell it at cow_file_range() that the minimum allocation size can match the filesystem's sector size. This later breaks the relocation's expectation that an extent associated to a file extent item in the data relocation inode has the same size as the respective extent pointed by a file extent item in another tree - in this case the extent to which the relocation inode poins to is smaller, causing relocation.c:get_new_location() to return -EINVAL. For example, if we are relocating a data block group X that has a logical address of X and the block group has an extent allocated at the logical address X + 128KiB with a size of 64KiB: 1) At prealloc_file_extent_cluster() we allocate an extent for the data relocation inode with a size of 64KiB and associate it to the file offset 128KiB (X + 128KiB - X) of the data relocation inode. This preallocated extent was allocated at block group Z; 2) A scrub running in parallel turns block group Z into RO mode and starts scrubing its extents; 3) Relocation triggers writeback for the data relocation inode; 4) When running delalloc (btrfs_run_delalloc_range()), we try first the NOCOW path because the data relocation inode has BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC set in its flags. However, because block group Z is in RO mode, the NOCOW path (run_delalloc_nocow()) falls back into the COW path, by calling cow_file_range(); 5) At cow_file_range(), in the first iteration of the while loop we call btrfs_reserve_extent() to allocate a 64KiB extent and pass it a minimum allocation size of 4KiB (fs_info->sectorsize). Due to free space fragmentation, btrfs_reserve_extent() ends up allocating two extents of 32KiB each, each one on a different iteration of that while loop; 6) Writeback of the data relocation inode completes; 7) Relocation proceeds and ends up at relocation.c:replace_file_extents(), with a leaf which has a file extent item that points to the data extent from block group X, that has a logical address (bytenr) of X + 128KiB and a size of 64KiB. Then it calls get_new_location(), which does a lookup in the data relocation tree for a file extent item starting at offset 128KiB (X + 128KiB - X) and belonging to the data relocation inode. It finds a corresponding file extent item, however that item points to an extent that has a size of 32KiB, which doesn't match the expected size of 64KiB, resuling in -EINVAL being returned from this function and propagated up to __btrfs_cow_block(), which aborts the current transaction. To fix this make sure that at cow_file_range() when we call the allocator we pass it a minimum allocation size corresponding the desired extent size if the inode belongs to the data relocation tree, otherwise pass it the filesystem's sector size as the minimum allocation size. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
There is a race between block group removal and block group creation when the removal is completed by a task running fitrim or scrub. When this happens we end up failing the block group creation with an error -EEXIST since we attempt to insert a duplicate block group item key in the extent tree. That results in a transaction abort. The race happens like this: 1) Task A is doing a fitrim, and at btrfs_trim_block_group() it freezes block group X with btrfs_freeze_block_group() (until very recently that was named btrfs_get_block_group_trimming()); 2) Task B starts removing block group X, either because it's now unused or due to relocation for example. So at btrfs_remove_block_group(), while holding the chunk mutex and the block group's lock, it sets the 'removed' flag of the block group and it sets the local variable 'remove_em' to false, because the block group is currently frozen (its 'frozen' counter is > 0, until very recently this counter was named 'trimming'); 3) Task B unlocks the block group and the chunk mutex; 4) Task A is done trimming the block group and unfreezes the block group by calling btrfs_unfreeze_block_group() (until very recently this was named btrfs_put_block_group_trimming()). In this function we lock the block group and set the local variable 'cleanup' to true because we were able to decrement the block group's 'frozen' counter down to 0 and the flag 'removed' is set in the block group. Since 'cleanup' is set to true, it locks the chunk mutex and removes the extent mapping representing the block group from the mapping tree; 5) Task C allocates a new block group Y and it picks up the logical address that block group X had as the logical address for Y, because X was the block group with the highest logical address and now the second block group with the highest logical address, the last in the fs mapping tree, ends at an offset corresponding to block group X's logical address (this logical address selection is done at volumes.c:find_next_chunk()). At this point the new block group Y does not have yet its item added to the extent tree (nor the corresponding device extent items and chunk item in the device and chunk trees). The new group Y is added to the list of pending block groups in the transaction handle; 6) Before task B proceeds to removing the block group item for block group X from the extent tree, which has a key matching: (X logical offset, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY, length) task C while ending its transaction handle calls btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), which finds block group Y and tries to insert the block group item for Y into the exten tree, which fails with -EEXIST since logical offset is the same that X had and task B hasn't yet deleted the key from the extent tree. This failure results in a transaction abort, producing a stack like the following: ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17) WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 19736 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2074 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1eb/0x260 [btrfs] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor raid6_pq (...) CPU: 2 PID: 19736 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1eb/0x260 [btrfs] Code: ff ff ff 48 8b 55 50 f0 48 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffa4160a1c7d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff961581909d98 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffb3d63990 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff9614f3356a58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff9615b65b0040 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff961581909c10 R13: ffff9615b0c32000 R14: ffff9614f3356ab0 R15: ffff9614be779000 FS: 00007f2ce2841e80(0000) GS:ffff9615bae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000555f18780000 CR3: 0000000131d34005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x398/0x4e0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xd0/0xc50 [btrfs] ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1e/0x50 [btrfs] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 iterate_supers+0xdb/0x180 ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 __ia32_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x7f2ce1d4d5b7 Code: 83 c4 08 48 3d 01 (...) RSP: 002b:00007ffd8b558c58 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000002c RCX: 00007f2ce1d4d5b7 RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 00000000186ba07b RDI: 000000000000002c RBP: 0000555f17b9e520 R08: 0000000000000012 R09: 000000000000ce00 R10: 0000000000000078 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000032 R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007ffd8b558cd0 R15: 0000555f1798ec20 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a9c ]--- Fix this simply by making btrfs_remove_block_group() remove the block group's item from the extent tree before it flags the block group as removed. Also make the free space deletion from the free space tree before flagging the block group as removed, to avoid a similar race with adding and removing free space entries for the free space tree. Fixes: 04216820 ("Btrfs: fix race between fs trimming and block group remove/allocation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When removing a block group, if we fail to delete the block group's item from the extent tree, we jump to the 'out' label and end up decrementing the block group's reference count once only (by 1), resulting in a counter leak because the block group at that point was already removed from the block group cache rbtree - so we have to decrement the reference count twice, once for the rbtree and once for our lookup at the start of the function. There is a second bug where if removing the free space tree entries (the call to remove_block_group_free_space()) fails we end up jumping to the 'out_put_group' label but end up decrementing the reference count only once, when we should have done it twice, since we have already removed the block group from the block group cache rbtree. This happens because the reference count decrement for the rbtree reference happens after attempting to remove the free space tree entries, which is far away from the place where we remove the block group from the rbtree. To make things less error prone, decrement the reference count for the rbtree immediately after removing the block group from it. This also eleminates the need for two different exit labels on error, renaming 'out_put_label' to just 'out' and removing the old 'out'. Fixes: f6033c5e ("btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
- 13 Jun, 2020 1 commit
-
-
David Sterba authored
This reverts commit a43a67a2. This patch reverts the main part of switching direct io implementation to iomap infrastructure. There's a problem in invalidate page that couldn't be solved as regression in this development cycle. The problem occurs when buffered and direct io are mixed, and the ranges overlap. Although this is not recommended, filesystems implement measures or fallbacks to make it somehow work. In this case, fallback to buffered IO would be an option for btrfs (this already happens when direct io is done on compressed data), but the change would be needed in the iomap code, bringing new semantics to other filesystems. Another problem arises when again the buffered and direct ios are mixed, invalidation fails, then -EIO is set on the mapping and fsync will fail, though there's no real error. There have been discussions how to fix that, but revert seems to be the least intrusive option. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20200528192103.xm45qoxqmkw7i5yl@fiona/Signed-off-by:
-
- 09 Jun, 2020 3 commits
-
-
David Sterba authored
This reverts commit b75b7ca7. The patch restores a helper that was not necessary after direct IO port to iomap infrastructure, which gets reverted. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
This reverts commit 5f008163. The patch is a simplification after direct IO port to iomap infrastructure, which gets reverted. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
This reverts commit d8f3e735. The patch is a cleanup of direct IO port to iomap infrastructure, which gets reverted. Signed-off-by:
-
- 28 May, 2020 9 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
We always preallocate a data extent for writing a free space cache, which causes writeback to always try the nocow path first, since the free space inode has the prealloc bit set in its flags. However if the block group that contains the data extent for the space cache has been turned to RO mode due to a running scrub or balance for example, we have to fallback to the cow path. In that case once a new data extent is allocated we end up calling btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), which decrements the counter named bytes_may_use from the data space_info object with the expection that this counter was previously incremented with the same amount (the size of the data extent). However when we started writeout of the space cache at cache_save_setup(), we incremented the value of the bytes_may_use counter through a call to btrfs_check_data_free_space() and then decremented it through a call to btrfs_prealloc_file_range_trans() immediately after. So when starting the writeback if we fallback to cow mode we have to increment the counter bytes_may_use of the data space_info again to compensate for the extent allocation done by the cow path. When this issue happens we are incorrectly decrementing the bytes_may_use counter and when its current value is smaller then the amount we try to subtract we end up with the following warning: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 657 at fs/btrfs/space-info.h:115 btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x3d6/0x4e0 [btrfs] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor raid6_pq libcrc32c (...) CPU: 3 PID: 657 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-1591) RIP: 0010:btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x3d6/0x4e0 [btrfs] Code: ff ff 48 (...) RSP: 0000:ffffa41608f13660 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: ffff9615b93ae400 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9615b96ab410 RBP: fffffffffffee000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff961585e62a40 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9615b96ab400 R13: ffff9615a1a2a000 R14: 0000000000012000 R15: ffff9615b93ae400 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9615bb200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055cbbc2ae178 CR3: 0000000115794006 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: find_free_extent+0x4a0/0x16c0 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x91/0x180 [btrfs] cow_file_range+0x12d/0x490 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x9f/0x6d0 [btrfs] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x221/0x250 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xe8/0x150 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0xe8/0x4c0 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x237/0x530 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x44/0xa0 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x23/0x80 __writeback_single_inode+0x59/0x700 writeback_sb_inodes+0x267/0x5f0 __writeback_inodes_wb+0x87/0xe0 wb_writeback+0x382/0x590 ? wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0 wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0 process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 kthread+0x103/0x140 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a52 ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------ So fix this by incrementing the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info when we fallback to the cow path. If the cow path is successful the counter is decremented after extent allocation (by btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()), if it fails it ends up being decremented as well when clearing the delalloc range (extent_clear_unlock_delalloc()). This could be triggered sporadically by the test case btrfs/061 from fstests. Fixes: 82d5902d ("Btrfs: Support reading/writing on disk free ino cache") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When doing a buffered write we always try to reserve data space for it, even when the file has the NOCOW bit set or the write falls into a file range covered by a prealloc extent. This is done both because it is expensive to check if we can do a nocow write (checking if an extent is shared through reflinks or if there's a hole in the range for example), and because when writeback starts we might actually need to fallback to COW mode (for example the block group containing the target extents was turned into RO mode due to a scrub or balance). When we are unable to reserve data space we check if we can do a nocow write, and if we can, we proceed with dirtying the pages and setting up the range for delalloc. In this case the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info object is not incremented, unlike in the case where we are able to reserve data space (done through btrfs_check_data_free_space() which calls btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()). Later when running delalloc we attempt to start writeback in nocow mode but we might revert back to cow mode, for example because in the meanwhile a block group was turned into RO mode by a scrub or relocation. The cow path after successfully allocating an extent ends up calling btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), which expects the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info object to have been incremented before - but we did not do it when the buffered write started, since there was not enough available data space. So btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() ends up decrementing the bytes_may_use counter anyway, and when the counter's current value is smaller then the size of the allocated extent we get a stack trace like the following: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 20138 at fs/btrfs/space-info.h:115 btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x3d6/0x4e0 [btrfs] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor raid6_pq libcrc32c (...) CPU: 0 PID: 20138 Comm: kworker/u8:15 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-1754) RIP: 0010:btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x3d6/0x4e0 [btrfs] Code: ff ff 48 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffbda18a4b3568 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9ca076f5d800 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9ca068470410 RBP: fffffffffffff000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff9ca079d58040 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9ca068470400 R13: ffff9ca0408b2000 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: ffff9ca076f5d800 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ca07a600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005605dbfe7048 CR3: 0000000138570006 CR4: 00000000003606f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: find_free_extent+0x4a0/0x16c0 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x91/0x180 [btrfs] cow_file_range+0x12d/0x490 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x341/0xa40 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x1ea/0x6d0 [btrfs] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x221/0x250 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xe8/0x150 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0xe8/0x4c0 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x237/0x530 [btrfs] ? btrfs_wq_submit_bio+0x9f/0xc0 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x44/0xa0 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x23/0x80 __writeback_single_inode+0x59/0x700 writeback_sb_inodes+0x267/0x5f0 __writeback_inodes_wb+0x87/0xe0 wb_writeback+0x382/0x590 ? wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0 wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0 process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 kthread+0x103/0x140 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff94ebdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff94ebdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace f9f6ef8ec4cd8ec9 ]--- So to fix this, when falling back into cow mode check if space was not reserved, by testing for the bit EXTENT_NORESERVE in the respective file range, and if not, increment the bytes_may_use counter for the data space_info object. Also clear the EXTENT_NORESERVE bit from the range, so that if the cow path fails it decrements the bytes_may_use counter when clearing the delalloc range (through the btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() callback). Fixes: 7ee9e440 ("Btrfs: check if we can nocow if we don't have data space") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If an error happens while running dellaloc in COW mode for a range, we can end up calling extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() for a range that goes beyond our range's end offset by 1 byte, which affects 1 extra page. This results in clearing bits and doing page operations (such as a page unlock) outside our target range. Fix that by calling extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() with an inclusive end offset, instead of an exclusive end offset, at cow_file_range(). Fixes: a315e68f ("Btrfs: fix invalid attempt to free reserved space on failure to cow range") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The local 'b' variable is only used to directly read values from passed extent buffer. So eliminate it and directly use the input parameter. Furthermore this shrinks the size of the following functions: ./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.orig fs/btrfs/ctree.o add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-73 (-73) Function old new delta read_block_for_search.isra 876 871 -5 push_node_left 1112 1044 -68 Total: Before=50348, After=50275, chg -0.14% Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function wraps the optimisation implemented by d7396f07 ("Btrfs: optimize key searches in btrfs_search_slot") however this optimisation is really used in only one place - btrfs_search_slot. Just open code the optimisation and also add a comment explaining how it works since it's not clear just by looking at the code - the key point here is it depends on an internal invariant that BTRFS' btree provides, namely intermediate pointers always contain the key at slot0 at the child node. So in the case of exact match we can safely assume that the given key will always be in slot 0 on lower levels. Furthermore this results in a reduction of btrfs_search_slot's size: ./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.orig fs/btrfs/ctree.o add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-75 (-75) Function old new delta btrfs_search_slot 2783 2708 -75 Total: Before=50423, After=50348, chg -0.15% Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
The read and write versions don't have anything in common except for the call to iomap_dio_rw. So split this function, and merge each half into its only caller. Signed-off-by:
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Since we now perform direct reads using i_rwsem, we can remove this inode flag used to co-ordinate unlocked reads. The truncate call takes i_rwsem. This means it is correctly synchronized with concurrent direct reads. Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Since we removed the last user of dio_end_io(), remove the helper function dio_end_io(). Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Switch from __blockdev_direct_IO() to iomap_dio_rw(). Rename btrfs_get_blocks_direct() to btrfs_dio_iomap_begin() and use it as iomap_begin() for iomap direct I/O functions. This function allocates and locks all the blocks required for the I/O. btrfs_submit_direct() is used as the submit_io() hook for direct I/O ops. Since we need direct I/O reads to go through iomap_dio_rw(), we change file_operations.read_iter() to a btrfs_file_read_iter() which calls btrfs_direct_IO() for direct reads and falls back to generic_file_buffered_read() for incomplete reads and buffered reads. We don't need address_space.direct_IO() anymore so set it to noop. Similarly, we don't need flags used in __blockdev_direct_IO(). iomap is capable of direct I/O reads from a hole, so we don't need to return -ENOENT. BTRFS direct I/O is now done under i_rwsem, shared in case of reads and exclusive in case of writes. This guards against simultaneous truncates. Use iomap->iomap_end() to check for failed or incomplete direct I/O: - for writes, call __endio_write_update_ordered() - for reads, unlock extents btrfs_dio_data is now hooked in iomap->private and not current->journal_info. It carries the reservation variable and the amount of data submitted, so we can calculate the amount of data to call __endio_write_update_ordered in case of an error. This patch removes last use of struct buffer_head from btrfs. Signed-off-by:
-
- 25 May, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Filesystems such as btrfs can perform direct I/O without holding the inode->i_rwsem in some of the cases like writing within i_size. So, remove the check for lockdep_assert_held() in iomap_dio_rw(). Reviewed-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
This helps filesystems to perform tasks on the bio while submitting for I/O. This could be post-write operations such as data CRC or data replication for fs-handled RAID. Reviewed-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Export generic_file_buffered_read() to be used to supplement incomplete direct reads. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Since commit 1afb648e ("btrfs: use standard debug config option to enable free-space-cache debug prints"), we started to log error messages that were never logged before since there was no DEBUG macro defined anywhere. This started to make test case btrfs/187 to fail very often, as it greps for any btrfs error messages in dmesg/syslog and fails if any is found: (...) btrfs/186 1s ... 2s btrfs/187 - output mismatch (see .../results//btrfs/187.out.bad) \--- tests/btrfs/187.out 2019-05-17 12:48:32.537340749 +0100 \+++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/187.out.bad ... \@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ QA output created by 187 Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap1' Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap2' +[268364.139958] BTRFS error (device sdc): failed to write free space cache for block group 30408704 +[268380.156503] BTRFS error (device sdc): failed to write free space cache for block group 30408704 +[268380.161703] BTRFS error (device sdc): failed to write free space cache for block group 30408704 +[268380.253180] BTRFS error (device sdc): failed to write free space cache for block group 30408704 ... (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/187.out ... btrfs/188 4s ... 2s (...) The space cache write failures happen due to ENOSPC when attempting to update the free space cache items in the root tree. This happens because when starting or joining a transaction we don't know how many block groups we will end up changing (due to extent allocation or release) and therefore never reserve space for updating free space cache items. More often than not, the free space cache writeout succeeds since the metadata space info is not yet full nor very close to being full, but when it is, the space cache writeout fails with ENOSPC. Occasional failures to write space caches are not considered critical since they can be rebuilt when mounting the filesystem or the next attempt to write a free space cache in the next transaction commit might succeed, so we used to hide those error messages with a preprocessor check for the existence of the DEBUG macro that was never enabled anywhere. A few other generic test cases also trigger the error messages due to ENOSPC failure when writing free space caches as well, however they don't fail since they don't grep dmesg/syslog for any btrfs specific error messages. So change the messages from 'error' level to 'debug' level, as it doesn't make much sense to have error messages triggered only if the debug macro is enabled plus, more importantly, the error is not serious nor highly unexpected. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Currently the error messages logged when we fail to write a free space cache or an inode cache are not very useful as they don't mention what was the error. So include the error number in the messages. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The label 'fail_unlock' is pointless, all it does is to jump to the label 'out', so just remove it. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
We are currently treating any non-zero return value from btrfs_next_leaf() the same way, by going to the code that inserts a new checksum item in the tree. However if btrfs_next_leaf() returns an error (a value < 0), we should just stop and return the error, and not behave as if nothing has happened, since in that case we do not have a way to know if there is a next leaf or we are currently at the last leaf already. So fix that by returning the error from btrfs_next_leaf(). Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When we want to add checksums into the checksums tree, or a log tree, we try whenever possible to extend existing checksum items, as this helps reduce amount of metadata space used, since adding a new item uses extra metadata space for a btrfs_item structure (25 bytes). However we have two inefficiencies in the current approach: 1) After finding a checksum item that covers a range with an end offset that matches the start offset of the checksum range we want to insert, we release the search path populated by btrfs_lookup_csum() and then do another COW search on tree with the goal of getting additional space for at least one checksum. Doing this path release and then searching again is a waste of time because very often the leaf already has enough free space for at least one more checksum; 2) After the COW search that guarantees we get free space in the leaf for at least one more checksum, we end up not doing the extension of the previous checksum item, and fallback to insertion of a new checksum item, if the leaf doesn't have an amount of free space larger then the space required for 2 checksums plus one btrfs_item structure - this is pointless for two reasons: a) We want to extend an existing item, so we don't need to account for a btrfs_item structure (25 bytes); b) We made the COW search with an insertion size for 1 single checksum, so if the leaf ends up with a free space amount smaller then 2 checksums plus the size of a btrfs_item structure, we give up on the extension of the existing item and jump to the 'insert' label, where we end up releasing the path and then doing yet another search to insert a new checksum item for a single checksum. Fix these inefficiencies by doing the following: - For case 1), before releasing the path just check if the leaf already has enough space for at least 1 more checksum, and if it does, jump directly to the item extension code, with releasing our current path, which was already COWed by btrfs_lookup_csum(); - For case 2), fix the logic so that for item extension we require only that the leaf has enough free space for 1 checksum, and not a minimum of 2 checksums plus space for a btrfs_item structure. Signed-off-by:
-
