Since acpi_bus_set_power() should not use __acpi_bus_get_power() to
update the device's device->power.state field before changing its
power state (this may cause device->power.state to be inconsistent
with the device power resources' reference counters), remove this
call from it.  In consequence, the acpi_power_nocheck variable is not
necessary any more, so it can be dropped along with the DMI table
used for setting that variable for HP Pavilion 05.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There are no more users of acpi_bus_get_power(), so it can be
dropped.  Moreover, it should be dropped, because it modifies
the device->power.state field of an ACPI device without updating
the reference counters of the device's power resources, which is
wrong.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
acpi_fujitsu_add() and acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_add().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reported-and-Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power() for manipulating power
resources used by ACPI fan devices, which allows them to be put into
the right state during initialization and resume.  Consequently,
remove the flags.force_power_state field from struct acpi_device,
which is not necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Depending on the organization of the ACPI namespace, power resource
device objects may generally be scanned after the "regular" device
objects that they are referred from through _PRn.  This, in turn, may
cause acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to attempt to access them through
acpi_bus_init_power() before they are registered (and initialized by
acpi_power_driver).  [This is not a theoretical issue, it actually
happens for one PnP device on my testbed HP nx6325.]

To fix this problem, make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() attempt to
register power resource devices as soon as they have been found in
the _PRn output for any other devices.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The ACPI device driver used for handling power resources,
acpi_power_driver, creates a struct acpi_power_resource object for
each ACPI device representing a power resource.  These objects are
then used when setting and reading the power states of devices using
the corresponding power resources.  Unfortunately, acpi_power_driver
is registered after acpi_scan_init() that may add devices using the
power resources before acpi_power_driver has a chance to create
struct acpi_power_resource objects for them (specifically, the power
resources may be referred to during the scanning process through
acpi_bus_get_power() before they have been initialized).

As the first step towards fixing this issue, move the registration
of acpi_power_driver into acpi_scan_init() so that power resource
devices can be initialized by it as soon as they have been found in
the namespace.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Add function acpi_bus_update_power() for reading the actual power
state of an ACPI device and updating its device->power.state field
in such a way that its power resources' reference counters will
remain consistent with that field.

For this purpose introduce __acpi_bus_set_power() setting the
power state of an ACPI device without updating its
device->power.state field and make acpi_bus_set_power() and
acpi_bus_update_power() use it (acpi_bus_set_power() retains the
current behavior for now).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Add function acpi_bus_init_power() for getting the initial power
state of an ACPI device and reference counting its power resources
as appropriate.

Make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() use the new function instead of
acpi_bus_get_power() that updates device->power.state without
reference counting the device's power resources.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

It sometimes is necessary to get the power state of an ACPI device
without updating its device->power.state field, for example to
avoid inconsistencies between device->power.state and the reference
counters of the device's power resources.  For this purpose introduce
__acpi_bus_get_power() that will return the given device's power
state via a pointer (instead of modifying device->power.state)
and make acpi_bus_get_power() use it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Introduce function acpi_power_on_resources() that reference counts
and possibly turns on ACPI power resources for a given device and
a given power state of it.

This function will be used for reference counting device power
resources during initialization.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during
device initialization, so that their reference counters are always
up to date.  It is convenient to do that with the help of a function
that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in
a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list().
For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the
reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify
acpi_power_transition().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should not update
device->power.state behind the back of its caller, so make it return
the state via a pointer instead.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Version 20101209.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Modify/add some comments to minimize ACPICA/linux GPE code divergence.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The global event handler is called whenever a general purpose
or fixed ACPI event occurs.

Also update Linux OSL to collect events counter with
global event handler.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

This feature provides an automatic device notification for wake devices
when a wakeup GPE occurs and there is no corresponding GPE method or
handler. Rather than ignoring such a GPE, an implicit AML Notify
operation is performed on the parent device object.
This feature is not part of the ACPI specification and is provided for
Windows compatibility only.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Change the local variable in acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method()
back into a pointer as ACPICA code base does.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The new GPE handler callback has 2 additional parameters, gpe_device and
gpe_number.

typedef
u32 (*acpi_gpe_handler) (acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number, void *context);
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Some function and variable names are renamed to be consistent with
ACPICA code base.

acpi_raw_enable_gpe -> acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference
acpi_raw_disable_gpe -> acpi_ev_remove_gpe_reference
acpi_gpe_can_wake -> acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake
acpi_gpe_wakeup -> acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask
acpi_update_gpes -> acpi_update_all_gpes
acpi_all_gpes_initialized -> acpi_gbl_all_gpes_initialized
acpi_handler_info -> acpi_gpe_handler_info
...
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Create a new file evxfgpe.c and move GPE specific functions to it.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

sysfs I/F for ACPI power devices, including AC and Battery,
has been working in upstream kenrel since 2.6.24, Sep 2007.
In 2.6.37, we made the sysfs I/F always built in and this option
disabled by default.
Now, we plan to remove this option and the ACPI power procfs
interface in 2.6.39.

First, update the feature-removal-schedule to announce this change.
Second, add runtime warnings in ACPI AC/Battery/SBS driver, so that
users will notice this change even if "make oldconfig" is used.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

This patch adds event notification support to the generic
thermal sysfs framework in the kernel. The notification is in the
form of a netlink event.
Signed-off-by: R.Durgadoss <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI
companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be
accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct
device objects.

Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the
driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem
with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM
and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in
that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't
exist any more while the device is being resumed).  It also allows us
to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was
undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP
device is not present any more while it is being suspended).

This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems
with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver
has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to
handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the
users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in
there.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

After one CPU is offlined, it is unnecessary to switch T-state for it.
So it will be better that the throttling is disabled after the cpu
is offline.
At the same time after one cpu is online, we should check whether
the T-state is supported and then set the corresponding T-state
flag.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Now before it executes the T-state operation on one CPU, it will try to
migrate to the target CPU. Especially this is required on the system that
uses the MSR_IA32_THERMAL_CONTROL register to switch T-state.
But unfortunately it doesn't check whether the migration is successful or not.
In such case we will get/set the incorrect T-state on the offline CPU as
it fails in the migration to the offline CPU.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Apparently, Averatec AV1020-ED2 does not resume correctly without
acpi_sleep=nonvs, so add it to the ACPI sleep blacklist.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396#c86Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Since ACPI buttons and lids can be configured to wake up the system
from sleep states, report wakeup events from these devices.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Drop special ACPI wakeup flags, wakeup.state.enabled and
wakeup.flags.always_enabled, that aren't necessary any more after
we've started to use standard device wakeup flags for handling ACPI
wakeup devices.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There are ACPI devices (buttons and the laptop lid) that can wake up
the system from sleep states and have no "physical" companion
devices.  The ACPI subsystem uses two flags, wakeup.state.enabled and
wakeup.flags.always_enabled, for handling those devices, but they
are not accessible through the standard device wakeup infrastructure.
User space can only control them via the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface
that is not really convenient (e.g. the way in which devices are
enabled to wake up the system is not portable between different
systems, because it requires one to know the devices' "names" used in
the system's ACPI tables).

To address this problem, use standard device wakeup flags instead of
the special ACPI flags for handling those devices.  In particular,
use device_set_wakeup_capable() to mark the ACPI wakeup devices
during initialization and use device_set_wakeup_enable() to allow
or disallow them to wake up the system from sleep states.  Rework
the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface to take these changes into account.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

If a device is enabled to wake up the system from sleep states via
/proc/acpi/wakeup and there are other devices associated with the
same wakeup GPE, all of these devices are automatically enabled to
wake up the system.  This isn't correct, because the fact the GPE is
shared need not imply that wakeup power has to be enabled for all the
devices at the same time (i.e. it is possible that one device will
have its wakeup power enabled and it will wake up the system from a
sleep state if the shared wakeup GPE is enabled, while another device
having its wakeup power disabled will not wake up the system even
though the GPE is enabled).  Rework acpi_system_write_wakeup_device()
so that it only enables wakeup for one device at a time.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There are two problems with the ACPICA's current implementation of
the global lock acquisition.  First, acpi_ev_global_lock_handler(),
which in fact is an interface to the outside of the kernel, doesn't
validate its input, so it only works correctly if the other side
(i.e. the ACPI firmware) is fully specification-compliant (as far
as the global lock is concerned).  Unfortunately, that's known not
to be the case on some systems (i.e. we get spurious global lock
signaling interrupts without the pending flag set on some systems).
Second, acpi_ev_global_lock_handler() attempts to acquire the global
lock on behalf of a thread waiting for it without checking if there
actually is such a thread.  Both of these shortcomings need to be
addressed to prevent all possible race conditions from happening.

Rework acpi_ev_global_lock_handler() so that it doesn't try to
acquire the global lock and make it signal the availability of the
global lock to the waiting thread instead.  Make sure that the
availability of the global lock can only be signaled when there
is a thread waiting for it and that it can't be signaled more than
once in a row (to keep acpi_gbl_global_lock_semaphore in balance).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>