- Opening a hugetlbfs file O_TRUNC calls the generic vmtruncate() functions
  and nukes the kernel.

  Give S_ISREG hugetlbfs files a inode_operations, and hence a setattr
  which know how to handle these files.

- Don't permit the user to truncate hugetlbfs files to sizes which are not
  a multiple of HPAGE_SIZE.

- We don't support expanding in ftruncate(), so remove that code.

Having to specify the mapping address is a pain.  Give hugetlbfs files a
file_operations.get_unmapped_area().

The implementation is in hugetlbfs rather than in arch code because it's
probably common to several architectures.  If the architecture has special
needs it can define HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA and go it alone.  Just
like HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA.

The odd thing about hugetlb is that it maintains its own freelist of pages.
And it has to do that, else it would trivially run out of pages due to buddy
fragmetation.

So we we don't want callers of put_page() to be passing those pages
to __free_pages_ok() on the final put().

So hugetlb installs a destructor in the compound pages to point at
free_huge_page(), which knows how to put these pages back onto the free list.

Also, don't mark hugepages as all PageReserved any more.  That's preenting
callers from doing proper refcounting.  Any code which does a user pagetable
walk and hits part of a hugepage will now handle it transparently.

We currently have a problem when things like ptrace, futexes and direct-io
try to pin user pages.  If the user's address is in a huge page we're
elevting the refcount of a constituent 4k page, not the head page of the
high-order allocation unit.

To solve this, a generic way of handling higher-order pages has been
implemented:

- A higher-order page is called a "compound page".  Chose this because
  "huge page", "large page", "super page", etc all seem to mean different
  things to different people.

- The first (controlling) 4k page of a compound page is referred to as the
  "head" page.

- The remaining pages are tail pages.

All pages have PG_compound set.  All pages have their lru.next pointing at
the head page (even the head page has this).

The head page's lru.prev, if non-zero, holds the address of the compound
page's put_page() function.

The order of the allocation is stored in the first tail page's lru.prev.
This is only for debug at present.  This usage means that zero-order pages
may not be compound.

The above relationships are established for _all_ higher-order pages in the
page allocator.  Which has some cost, but not much - another atomic op during
fork(), mainly.

This functionality is only enabled if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, although it could
be turned on permanently.  There's a little extra cost in get_page/put_page.

These changes do not preclude adding compound pages to the LRU in the future
- we can add a new page flag to the head page and then move all the
additional data to the first tail page's lru.next, lru.prev, list.next,
list.prev, index, private, etc.

Seems that nobody has tested direct IO into hugetlb pages yet.  The VFS gets
upset about running set_page_dirty() against a non-uptodate page.

So give hugetlbfs inodes a private no-op ->set_page_dirty() to isolate them
from all that.

There are several places in which the return value from pte_chain_alloc() is
not being checked, and one place in which a GFP_KERNEL allocatiopn is
happening inside spinlock.

Patch from Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>

The loop driver's loop over elements of bi_io_vec is in lo_send and
lo_receive: iterating that same transfer bi_vcnt times at the level above is,
er, excessive.  (And no need to increment bi_idx here.)

Patch from rwhron@earthlink.net

Micro-optimization of default_idle from -aa.  current_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok
is only false for some old 386/486 pcs.

ia32 and others can determine a page's hugeness by inspecting the pmd's value
directly.  No need to perform a VMA lookup against the user's virtual
address.

This patch ifdef's away the VMA-based implementation of
hugepage-aware-follow_page for ia32 and replaces it with a pmd-based
implementation.

The intent is that architectures will implement one or the other.  So the architecture either:

1: Implements hugepage_vma()/follow_huge_addr(), and stubs out
   pmd_huge()/follow_huge_pmd() or

2: Implements pmd_huge()/follow_huge_pmd(), and stubs out
   hugepage_vma()/follow_huge_addr()

Using a futex in a large page causes a kernel lockup in __pin_page() -
because __pin_page's page revalidation uses follow_page(), and follow_page()
doesn't work for hugepages.

The patch fixes up follow_page() to return the appropriate 4k page for
hugepages.

This incurs a vma lookup for each follow_page(), which is considerable
overhead in some situations.  We only _need_ to do this if the architecture
cannot determin a page's hugeness from the contents of the PMD.

So this patch is a "reference" implementation for, say, PPC BAT-based
hugepages.

Patch from "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>

Hello All,

  We were looking at the performance impact of the IRQ routing from
the 2.5.52 Linux kernel. This email includes some of our findings
about the way the interrupts are getting moved in the 2.5.52 kernel.
Also there is discussion and a patch for a new implementation. Let
me know what you think at nitin.a.kamble@intel.com

Current implementation:
======================
We have found that the existing implementation works well on IA32
SMP systems with light load of interrupts. Also we noticed that it
is not working that well under heavy interrupt load conditions on
these SMP systems. The observations are:

* Interrupt load of each IRQ is getting balanced on CPUs independent
of load of other IRQs. Also the current implementation moves the
IRQs randomly. This works well when the interrupt load is light. But
we start seeing imbalance of interrupt load with existence of
multiple heavy interrupt sources. Frequently multiple heavily loaded
IRQs gets moved to a single CPU while other CPUs stay very lightly
loaded. To achieve a good interrupts load balance, it is important to
consider the load of all the interrupts together.
    This further can be explained with an example of 4 CPUs and 4
heavy interrupt sources. With the existing random movement approach,
the chance of each of these heavy interrupt sources moving to separate
CPUs is: (4/4)*(3/4)*(2/4)*(1/4) = 3/16. It means 13/16 = 81.25% of
the time the situation is, some CPUs are very lightly loaded and some
are loaded with multiple heavy interrupts. This causes the interrupt
load imbalance and results in less performance. In a case of 2 CPUs
and 2 heavily loaded interrupt sources, this imbalance happens
1/2 = 50% of the times. This issue becomes more and more severe with
increasing number of heavy interrupt sources.

* Another interesting observation is: We cannot see the imbalance
of the interrupt load from /proc/interrupts. (/proc/interrupts shows
the cumulative load of interrupts on all CPUs.) If the interrupt load
is imbalanced and this imbalance is getting rotated among CPUs
continuously, then /proc/interrupts will still show that the interrupt
load is going to processors very evenly. Currently at the frequency
(HZ/50) at which IRQs are moved across CPUs, it is not possible to
see any interrupt load imbalance happening.

* We have also found that, in certain cases the static IRQ binding
performs better than the existing kernel distribution of interrupt
load. The reason is, in a well-balanced interrupt load situations,
these interrupts are unnecessarily getting frequently moved across
CPUs. This adds an extra overhead; also it takes off the CPU cache
warmth benefits.
  This came out from the performance measurements done on a 4-way HT
(8 logical processors) Pentium 4 Xeon system running 8 copies of
netperf. The 4 NICs in the system taking different IRQs generated
sizable interrupt load with the help of connected clients.

Here the netperf transactions/sec throughput numbers observed are:

IRQs nicely manually bound to CPUs: 56.20K
The current kernel implementation of IRQ movement: 50.05K
 -----------------------
 The static binding of IRQs has performed 12.28% better than the
current IRQ movement implemented in the kernel.

* The current implementation does not distinguish siblings from the
HT (Hyper-Threading(tm)) enabled CPUs. It will be beneficial to
balance the interrupt load with respect to processor packages first,
and then among logical CPUs inside processor packages.
  For example if we have 2 heavy interrupt sources and 2 processor
packages (4 logical CPUs); Assigning both the heavy interrupt sources
in different processor packages is better, it will use different
execution resources from the different processor packages.



New revised implementation:
==========================
We also have been working on a new implementation. The following
points are in main focus.

* At any moment heavily loaded IRQs are distributed to different
CPUs to achieve as much balance as possible.

* Lightly loaded interrupt sources are ignored from the load
balancing, as they do not cause considerable imbalance.

* When the heavy interrupt sources are balanced, they are not moved
around. This also helps in keeping the CPU caches warm.

* It has been made HT aware. While distributing the load, the load
on a processor package to which the logical CPUs belong to is also
considered.

* In the situations of few (lesser than num_cpus) heavy interrupt
sources, it is not possible to balance them evenly. In such case
the existing code has been reused to move the interrupts. The
randomness from the original code has been removed.

* The time interval for redistribution has been made flexible. It
varies as the system interrupt load changes.

* A new kernel_thread is introduced to do the load balancing
calculations for all the interrupt sources. It keeps the balanace_maps
ready for interrupt handlers, keeping the overhead in the interrupt
handling to minimum.

* It allows the disabling of the IRQ distribution from the boot loader
command line, if anybody wants to do it for any reason.

* The algorithm also takes into account the static binding of
interrupts to CPUs that user imposes from the
/proc/irq/{n}/smp_affinity interface.


Throughput numbers with the netperf setup for the new implementation:

Current kernel IRQ balance implementation: 50.02K transactions/sec
The new IRQ balance implementation: 56.01K transactions/sec
 ---------------------
  The performance improvement on P4 Xeon of 11.9% is observed.

The new IRQ balance implementation also shows little performance
improvement on P6 (Pentium II, III) systems.

On a P6 system the netperf throughput numbers are:
Current kernel IRQ balance implementation: 36.96K transactions/sec
The new IRQ balance implementation: 37.65K transactions/sec
 ---------------------
Here the performance improvement on P6 system of about 2% is observed.


 ---------------------

Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com> did some testing of this patch on a quad
P4:


I got a chance to run the NetBench benchmark with your patch on 2.5.54-mjb2
kernel.  NetBench measures SMB/CIFS performance by using several SMB
clients  (in this case 44 Windows 2000 systems), sending SMB requests to a
Linux  server running Samba 2.2.3a+sendfile.  Result is in throughput,
Mbps.   Generally the network traffic on the server is 60% recv, 40% tx.

I believe we have very similar systems.  Mine is a 4 x 1.6 GHz, 1 MB L3 P4
Xeon with 4 GB DDR memory (3.2 GB/sec I believe).  The chipset is "Summit".
 I also have more than one Intel e1000 adapters.

I decided to run a few configurations, first with just one adapter, with
and  without HT support in the kernel (acpi=off), then add another adapter
and  test again with/without HT.

Here are the results:

4P, no HT, 1 x e1000, no kirq:	1214 Mbps, 4% idle
4P, no HT, 1 x e1000, kirq:		1223 Mbps, 4% idle,		+0.74%

I suppose we didn't see much of an improvement here because we never run
into  the situation where more than one interrupt with a high rate is
routed to a  single CPU on irq_balance.

4P, HT, 1 x e1000, no kirq:	1214 Mbps, 25% idle
4P, HT, 1 x e1000, kirq:	1220 Mbps, 30% idle,			+0.49%

Again, not much of a difference just yet, but lots of idle time.  We may
have  reached the limit at which one logical CPU can process interrupts for
an  e1000 adapter.  There are other things I can probably do to help this,
like  int delay, and NAPI, which I will get to eventually.

4P, HT, 2 x e1000, no kirq:	1269 Mbps, 23% idle
4P, HT, 2 x e1000, kirq:	1329 Mbps, 18% idle			+4.7%

OK, almost 5% better!  Probably has to do with a couple of things; the fact
that your code does not route two different interrupts to the same
core/different logical cpus (quite obvious by looking at /proc/interrupts),
and that more than one interrupt does not go to the same cpu if possible.
I  suspect irq_balance did some of those [bad] things some of the time, and
we  observed a bottleneck in int processing that was lower than with kirq.

I don't think all of the idle time is because of a int processing
bottleneck.   I'm just not sure what it is yet :)  Hopefully something will
become obvious  to me...

Overall I like the way it works, and I believe it can be tweaked to work
with  NUMA when necessary.  I hope to have access to a specweb system on a
NUMA box  soon, so we can verify that.

Patch from Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

there's a SMP race condition between __sync_single_inode (or __sync_one on
2.4.20) and __mark_inode_dirty. __mark_inode_dirty doesn't take inode
spinlock. As we know -- unless you take a spinlock or use barrier,
processor can change order of instructions.

CPU 1

modify inode
(but modifications are in cpu-local
buffer and do not go to bus)

calls
__mark_inode_dirty
it sees I_DIRTY and exits immediatelly
					CPU 2
					takes spinlock
					calls __sync_single_inode
					inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY
					writes the inode (but does not see
					modifications by CPU 1 yet)

CPU 1 flushes its write buffer to the bus
inode is already written, clean, modifications
done by CPU1 are lost

The easiest fix would be to move the test inside spinlock in
__mark_inode_dirty; if you do not want to suffer from performance loss,
use the attached patches that use memory barriers to ensure ordering of
reads and writes.

Patch from "Stephen D. Smalley" <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>

This patch restores the LSM hook calls in sendfile to 2.5.59.  The hook was
previously added as of 2.5.29 but the hook calls in sendfile were
subsequently lost as a result of the sendfile rewrite as of 2.5.30.

Patch from Roger Gammans <roger@computer-surgery.co.uk>

Adds lots of API documentation to the JBD layer.

Patch from Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>

this patch (against 2.5.59) updates Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt to
the (more-or-less; I certainly missed some parameters) current state of
kernel.  Note also that I will probably send up another update after few
further kernel releases..

We don't need these with self-unplugging queues.

The patch also contains a couple of microopts suggested by Andrea: we
don't need to run sync_page() if the page just came unlocked.

The patch teaches a queue to unplug itself:

a) if is has four requests OR
b) if it has had plugged requests for 3 milliseconds.

These numbers may need to be tuned, although doing so doesn't seem to
make much difference.  10 msecs works OK, so HZ=100 machines will be
fine.

Instrumentation shows that about 5-10% of requests were started due to
the three millisecond timeout (during a kernel compile).  That's
somewhat significant.  It means that the kernel is leaving stuff in the
queue, plugged, for too long.  This testing was with a uniprocessor
preemptible kernel, which is particularly vulnerable to unplug latency
(submit some IO, get preempted before the unplug).

This patch permits the removal of a lot of rather lame unplugging in
page reclaim and in the writeback code, which kicks the queues
(globally!) every four megabytes to get writeback underway.

This patch doesn't use blk_run_queues().  It is able to kick just the
particular queue.

The patch is not expected to make much difference really, except for
AIO.  AIO needs a blk_run_queues() in its io_submit() call.  For each
request.  This means that AIO has to disable plugging altogether,
unless something like this patch does it for it.  It means that AIO
will unplug *all* queues in the machine for every io_submit().  Even
against a socket!

This patch was tested by disabling blk_run_queues() completely.  The
system ran OK.

The 3 milliseconds may be too long.  It's OK for the heavy writeback
code, but AIO may want less.  Or maybe AIO really wants zero (ie:
disable plugging).  If that is so, we need new code paths by which AIO
can communicate the "immediate unplug" information - a global unplug is
not good.


To minimise unplug latency due to user CPU load, this patch gives keventd
`nice -10'.  This is of course completely arbitrary.  Really, I think keventd
should be SCHED_RR/MAX_RT_PRIO-1, as it has been in -aa kernels for ages.

Patch from Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>

The patch below is against 2.5.59, various forms have been floating
around for a while, and Andrew recently included this fixed version in
2.5.55-mm.  The end result is faster reads and writes for reiserfs.

This adds reiserfs support for readpages, along with a support func in
fs/mpage.c to deal with the reiserfs_get_block call sending back up to
date buffers with packed tails copied into them.

Most of the changes are to reiserfs_writepage, which still had many
2.4isms in the way it started io, dealt with errors and handled the bh
state bits.  I've also added an optimization so it only starts
transactions when we need to copy a packed tail into the btree or fill a
hole, instead of any time reiserfs_writepage hits an unmapped buffer.

Patch from Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>

bttv requires CONFIG_SOUND.

into home.transmeta.com:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux

into home.transmeta.com:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux

into home.transmeta.com:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux

into home.transmeta.com:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux

into kroah.com:/home/greg/linux/BK/pci-hp-2.5

Here's the memory leaks patch for acpiphp_glue.c.

The patch is modeled after your method for creating files for usb. It
makes a single file for pci sysfs files (except for pool, which I haven't
touched yet). It also exposes more pci information to User Space
through sysfs. Finally, it removes the dependence on the proc pci code
for sysfs files.

Fixes problems found by the CHECKER program in the pci hotplug drivers

Moved functions from drivers/hotplug/pci_hotplug_util.c to
drivers/pci/hotplug.c, which is a better place for them.

Relies on sysfs_update_file() to be present in the kernel.

Here is a little patch that remove procfs stuff in pci_hotplug_core.c
Remove /proc entry for pci_hotplug_core.

These were pointed out by "dan carpenter" <error27@email.com>
from his smatch tool.