For a while now it's been possible to use EXPORT_SYMBOL() in assembly
files, which allows us to place exports immediately after assembly
functions, as we do for C functions.

As a step towards removing arm64ksyms.c, let's move the string routine
exports to the assembly files the functions are defined in. Routines
which should only be exported for !KASAN builds are exported using the
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOKASAN() helper.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

For a while now it's been possible to use EXPORT_SYMBOL() in assembly
files, which allows us to place exports immediately after assembly
functions, as we do for C functions.

As a step towards removing arm64ksyms.c, let's move the uaccess exports
to the assembly files the functions are defined in.  As we have to
include <asm/assembler.h>, the existing includes are fixed to follow the
usual ordering conventions.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

For a while now it's been possible to use EXPORT_SYMBOL() in assembly
files, which allows us to place exports immediately after assembly
functions, as we do for C functions.

As a step towards removing arm64ksyms.c, let's move the copy_page and
clear_page exports to the assembly files the functions are defined in.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

For a while now it's been possible to use EXPORT_SYMBOL() in assembly
files, which allows us to place exports immediately after assembly
functions, as we do for C functions.

As a step towards removing arm64ksyms.c, let's move the SMCCC exports to
the assembly file the functions are defined in.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

For a while now it's been possible to use EXPORT_SYMBOL() in assembly
files, which allows us to place exports immediately after assembly
functions, as we do for C functions.

As a step towards removing arm64ksyms.c, let's move the tishift exports
to the assembly file the functions are defined in.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

So that we can export symbols directly from assembly files, let's make
use of the generic <asm/export.h>. We have a few symbols that we'll want
to conditionally export for !KASAN kernel builds, so we add a helper for
that in <asm/assembler.h>.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Since we define memstart_addr in a C file, we can have the export
immediately after the definition of the symbol, as we do elsewhere.

As a step towards removing arm64ksyms.c, move the export of
memstart_addr to init.c, where the symbol is defined.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Now that the arm64 bitops are inlines built atop of the regular atomics,
we don't need to export anything.

Remove the redundant exports.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The "L" AArch64 machine constraint, which we use for the "old" value in
an LL/SC cmpxchg(), generates an immediate that is suitable for a 64-bit
logical instruction. However, for cmpxchg() operations on types smaller
than 64 bits, this constraint can result in an invalid instruction which
is correctly rejected by GAS, such as EOR W1, W1, #0xffffffff.

Whilst we could special-case the constraint based on the cmpxchg size,
it's far easier to change the constraint to "K" and put up with using
a register for large 64-bit immediates. For out-of-line LL/SC atomics,
this is all moot anyway.
Reported-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Our percpu code is a bit of an inconsistent mess:

  * It rolls its own xchg(), but reuses cmpxchg_local()
  * It uses various different flavours of preempt_{enable,disable}()
  * It returns values even for the non-returning RmW operations
  * It makes no use of LSE atomics outside of the cmpxchg() ops
  * There are individual macros for different sizes of access, but these
    are all funneled through a switch statement rather than dispatched
    directly to the relevant case

This patch rewrites the per-cpu operations to address these shortcomings.
Whilst the new code is a lot cleaner, the big advantage is that we can
use the non-returning ST- atomic instructions when we have LSE.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The CAS instructions implicitly access only the relevant bits of the "old"
argument, so there is no need for explicit masking via type-casting as
there is in the LL/SC implementation.

Move the casting into the LL/SC code and remove it altogether for the LSE
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Our atomic instructions (either LSE atomics of LDXR/STXR sequences)
natively support byte, half-word, word and double-word memory accesses
so there is no need to mask the data register prior to being stored.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The asm-generic/preempt.h implementation doesn't make use of the
PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED flag, since this can interact badly with load/store
architectures which rely on the preempt_count word being unchanged across
an interrupt.

However, since we're a 64-bit architecture and the preempt count is
only 32 bits wide, we can simply pack it next to the resched flag and
load the whole thing in one go, so that a dec-and-test operation doesn't
need to load twice.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED is never used directly, so move it into the arch
code where it can potentially be implemented using either a different
bit in the preempt count or as an entirely separate entity.

Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Add hstate for each supported hugepage size using arch initcall.

* no hugepage parameters

  Without hugepage parameters, only a default hugepage size is
  available for dynamic allocation.  It's different, for example, from
  x86_64 and sparc64 where all supported hugepage sizes are available.

* only default_hugepagesz= is specified and set not to HPAGE_SIZE

  In spite of the fact that default_hugepagesz= is set to a valid
  hugepage size, it's treated as unsupported and reverted to
  HPAGE_SIZE.  Such behaviour is also different from x86_64 and
  sparc64.
Acked-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Klochkov <dmitry.klochkov@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.pais@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

This is a NEON acceleration method that can improve
performance by approximately 20%. I got the following
data from the centos 7.5 on Huawei's HISI1616 chip:

[ 93.837726] xor: measuring software checksum speed
[ 93.874039]   8regs  : 7123.200 MB/sec
[ 93.914038]   32regs : 7180.300 MB/sec
[ 93.954043]   arm64_neon: 9856.000 MB/sec
[ 93.954047] xor: using function: arm64_neon (9856.000 MB/sec)

I believe this code can bring some optimization for
all arm64 platform. thanks for Ard Biesheuvel's suggestions.
Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

In a way similar to ARM commit 09096f6a ("ARM: 7822/1: add workaround
for ambiguous C99 stdint.h types"), this patch redefines the macros that
are used in stdint.h so its definitions of uint64_t and int64_t are
compatible with those of the kernel.

This patch comes from: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3540001/
Wrote by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

We mark this file as a private file and don't have to override asm/types.h
Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The comment about SYS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE relying on ERET being
context-synchronizing is confusing and misplaced with kpti. Given that
this is already documented under Documentation/ (see arch-support.txt
for membarrier), remove the comment altogether.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Some CPUs can speculate past an ERET instruction and potentially perform
speculative accesses to memory before processing the exception return.
Since the register state is often controlled by a lower privilege level
at the point of an ERET, this could potentially be used as part of a
side-channel attack.

This patch emits an SB sequence after each ERET so that speculation is
held up on exception return.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We currently use a DSB; ISB sequence to inhibit speculation in set_fs().
Whilst this works for current CPUs, future CPUs may implement a new SB
barrier instruction which acts as an architected speculation barrier.

On CPUs that support it, patch in an SB; NOP sequence over the DSB; ISB
sequence and advertise the presence of the new instruction to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We use a stop_machine call for each available capability to
enable it on all the CPUs available at boot time. Instead
we could batch the cpu_enable callbacks to a single stop_machine()
call to save us some time.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Use the sorted list of capability entries for the detection and
verification.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Make use of the sorted capability list to access the capability
entry in this_cpu_has_cap() to avoid iterating over the two
tables.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We maintain two separate tables of capabilities, errata and features,
which decide the system capabilities. We iterate over each of these
tables for various operations (e.g, detection, verification etc.).
We do not have a way to map a system "capability" to its entry,
(i.e, cap -> struct arm64_cpu_capabilities) which is needed for
this_cpu_has_cap(). So we iterate over the table one by one to
find the entry and then do the operation. Also, this prevents
us from optimizing the way we "enable" the capabilities on the
CPUs, where we now issue a stop_machine() for each available
capability.

One solution is to merge the two tables into a single table,
sorted by the capability. But this is has the following
disadvantages:
  - We loose the "classification" of an errata vs. feature
  - It is quite easy to make a mistake when adding an entry,
    unless we sort the table at runtime.

So we maintain a list of pointers to the capability entry, sorted
by the "cap number" in a separate array, initialized at boot time.
The only restriction is that we can have one "entry" per capability.
While at it, remove the duplicate declaration of arm64_errata table.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Remove duplicate entries for Qualcomm erratum 1003. Since the entries
are not purely based on generic MIDR checks, use the multi_cap_entry
type to merge the entries.

Cc: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Merge duplicate entries for a single capability using the midr
range list for Cavium errata 30115 and 27456.

Cc: Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We have two entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE capability :

1) ARM Errata 826319, 827319, 824069, 819472 on A53 r0p[012]
2) ARM Errata 819472 on A53 r0p[01]

Both have the same work around. Merge these entries to avoid
duplicate entries for a single capability. Add a new Kconfig
entry to control the "capability" entry to make it easier
to handle combinations of the CONFIGs.

Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

readelf complains about the section layout of vmlinux when building
with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y (for KASLR):

  readelf: Warning: [21]: Link field (0) should index a symtab section.
  readelf: Warning: [21]: Info field (0) should index a relocatable section.

Also, it seems that our use of '-pie -shared' is contradictory, and
thus ambiguous. In general, the way KASLR is wired up at the moment
is highly tailored to how ld.bfd happens to implement (and conflate)
PIE executables and shared libraries, so given the current effort to
support other toolchains, let's fix some of these issues as well.

- Drop the -pie linker argument and just leave -shared. In ld.bfd,
  the differences between them are unclear (except for the ELF type
  of the produced image [0]) but lld chokes on seeing both at the
  same time.

- Rename the .rela output section to .rela.dyn, as is customary for
  shared libraries and PIE executables, so that it is not misidentified
  by readelf as a static relocation section (producing the warnings
  above).

- Pass the -z notext and -z norelro options to explicitly instruct the
  linker to permit text relocations, and to omit the RELRO program
  header (which requires a certain section layout that we don't adhere
  to in the kernel). These are the defaults for current versions of
  ld.bfd.

- Discard .eh_frame and .gnu.hash sections to avoid them from being
  emitted between .head.text and .text, screwing up the section layout.

These changes only affect the ELF image, and produce the same binary
image.

[0] b9dce7f1 ("arm64: kernel: force ET_DYN ELF type for ...")

Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <peter.smith@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Improve the performance of the crc32() asm routines by getting rid of
most of the branches and small sized loads on the common path.

Instead, use a branchless code path involving overlapping 16 byte
loads to process the first (length % 32) bytes, and process the
remainder using a loop that processes 32 bytes at a time.

Tested using the following test program:

  #include <stdlib.h>

  extern void crc32_le(unsigned short, char const*, int);

  int main(void)
  {
    static const char buf[4096];

    srand(20181126);

    for (int i = 0; i < 100 * 1000 * 1000; i++)
      crc32_le(0, buf, rand() % 1024);

    return 0;
  }

On Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57, the performance regresses but only very
slightly. On Cortex-A72 however, the performance improves from

  $ time ./crc32

  real  0m10.149s
  user  0m10.149s
  sys   0m0.000s

to

  $ time ./crc32

  real  0m7.915s
  user  0m7.915s
  sys   0m0.000s

Cc: Rui Sun <sunrui26@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The core ftrace hooks take the instrumented PC in x0, but for some
reason arm64's prepare_ftrace_return() takes this in x1.

For consistency, let's flip the argument order and always pass the
instrumented PC in x0.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The save_return_regs and restore_return_regs macros are only used by
return_to_handler, and having them defined out-of-line only serves to
obscure the logic.

Before we complicate, let's clean this up and fold the logic directly
into return_to_handler, saving a few lines of macro boilerplate in the
process. At the same time, a missing trailing space is added to the
comments, fixing a code style violation.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The core ftrace code requires that when it is handed the PC of an
instrumented function, this PC is the address of the instrumented
instruction. This is necessary so that the core ftrace code can identify
the specific instrumentation site. Since the instrumented function will
be a BL, the address of the instrumented function is LR - 4 at entry to
the ftrace code.

This fixup is applied in the mcount_get_pc and mcount_get_pc0 helpers,
which acquire the PC of the instrumented function.

The mcount_get_lr helper is used to acquire the LR of the instrumented
function, whose value does not require this adjustment, and cannot be
adjusted to anything meaningful. No adjustment of this value is made on
other architectures, including arm. However, arm64 adjusts this value by
4.

This patch brings arm64 in line with other architectures and removes the
adjustment of the LR value.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The core frace code has an optional sanity check on the frame pointer
passed by ftrace_graph_caller and return_to_handler. This is cheap,
useful, and enabled unconditionally on x86, sparc, and riscv.

Let's do the same on arm64, so that we can catch any problems early.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The global exports of ftrace_call and ftrace_graph_call are somewhat
painful to read. Let's use the generic GLOBAL() macro to ameliorate
matters.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Declaring a global symbol in assembly is tedious, error-prone, and
painful to read. While ENTRY() exists, this is supposed to be used for
function entry points, and this affects alignment in a potentially
undesireable manner.

Instead, let's add a generic GLOBAL() macro for this, as x86 added
locally in commit:

  95695547 ("x86: asm linkage - introduce GLOBAL macro")

... thus allowing us to use this more freely in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Commit 1212f7a1 ("scripts/kallsyms: filter arm64's __efistub_
symbols") updated the kallsyms code to filter out symbols with
the __efistub_ prefix explicitly, so we no longer require the
hack in our linker script to emit them as absolute symbols.

Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

As of commit 6460d320 ("arm64: io: Ensure calls to delay routines
are ordered against prior readX()"), MMIO reads smaller than 64 bits
fail to compile under clang because we end up mixing 32-bit and 64-bit
register operands for the same data processing instruction:

./include/asm-generic/io.h:695:9: warning: value size does not match register size specified by the constraint and modifier [-Wasm-operand-widths]
        return readb(addr);
               ^
./arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:147:58: note: expanded from macro 'readb'
                                                                       ^
./include/asm-generic/io.h:695:9: note: use constraint modifier "w"
./arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:147:50: note: expanded from macro 'readb'
                                                               ^
./arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:118:24: note: expanded from macro '__iormb'
        asm volatile("eor       %0, %1, %1\n"                           \
                                    ^

Fix the build by casting the macro argument to 'unsigned long' when used
as an input to the inline asm.
Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

In order to reduce the possibility of soft lock-ups, we bound the
maximum number of TLBI operations performed by a single call to
flush_tlb_range() to an arbitrary constant of 1024.

Whilst this does the job of avoiding lock-ups, we can actually be a bit
smarter by defining this as PTRS_PER_PTE. Due to the structure of our
page tables, using PTRS_PER_PTE means that an outer loop calling
flush_tlb_range() for entire table entries will end up performing just a
single TLBI operation for each entry. As an example, mremap()ing a 1GB
range mapped using 4k pages now requires only 512 TLBI operations when
moving the page tables as opposed to 262144 operations (512*512) when
using the current threshold of 1024.

Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Now that we have switched to the small code model entirely, and
reduced the extended KASLR range to 4 GB, we can be sure that the
targets of relative branches that are out of range are in range
for a ADRP/ADD pair, which is one instruction shorter than our
current MOVN/MOVK/MOVK sequence, and is more idiomatic and so it
is more likely to be implemented efficiently by micro-architectures.

So switch over the ordinary PLT code and the special handling of
the Cortex-A53 ADRP errata, as well as the ftrace trampline
handling.
Reviewed-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[will: Added a couple of comments in the plt equality check]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Add support for emitting ADR and ADRP instructions so we can switch
over our PLT generation code in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>