Andrei Vagin reported bind() regression with strace logs.

If we bind() a TCPv6 socket to ::FFFF:0.0.0.0 and then bind() a TCPv4
socket to 127.0.0.1, the 2nd bind() should fail but now succeeds.

  from socket import *

  s1 = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM)
  s1.bind(('::ffff:0.0.0.0', 0))

  s2 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM)
  s2.bind(('127.0.0.1', s1.getsockname()[1]))

During the 2nd bind(), if tb->family is AF_INET6 and sk->sk_family is
AF_INET in inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(), we still need to check
if tb has the v4-mapped-v6 wildcard address.

The example above does not work after commit 5456262d ("net: Fix
incorrect address comparison when searching for a bind2 bucket"), but
the blamed change is not the commit.

Before the commit, the leading zeros of ::FFFF:0.0.0.0 were treated
as 0.0.0.0, and the sequence above worked by chance.  Technically, this
case has been broken since bhash2 was introduced.

Note that if we bind() two sockets to 127.0.0.1 and then ::FFFF:0.0.0.0,
the 2nd bind() fails properly because we fall back to using bhash to
detect conflicts for the v4-mapped-v6 address.

Fixes: 28044fc1 ("net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address")
Reported-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZPuYBOFC8zsK6r9T@google.com/Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>