drm/i915: Use intel_ types more consistently for color management code (v2)
Try to be more consistent about intel_* types rather than drm_* types for lower-level driver functions. While we're at it, let's also be more consistent with state variable naming (half of the platforms use the name 'state' whereas the other half used 'crtc_state'). While we're touching these variables, let's also be more consistent about always naming the intel_crtc_state's "crtc_state" rather than "state" so that different platform types aren't using different naming conventions. v2: - s/state/crtc_state/ for consistency between platform types (Ville) - Drop the crtc parameter to intel_color_check(); we can just pull that out of the state object. Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181210215415.19854-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment