Commit fa8db494 authored by Mike Snitzer's avatar Mike Snitzer

dm: don't use bio_trim() afterall

bio_trim() has an early return, which makes it _not_ idempotent, if the
offset is 0 and the bio's bi_size already matches the requested size.
Prior to DM, all users of bio_trim() were fine with this.  But DM has
exposed the fact that bio_trim()'s early return is incompatible with a
cloned bio whose integrity payload must be trimmed via
bio_integrity_trim().

Fix this by reverting DM back to doing the equivalent of bio_trim() but
in an idempotent manner (so bio_integrity_trim is always performed).

Follow-on work is needed to assess what benefit bio_trim()'s early
return is providing to its existing callers.
Reported-by: default avatarMilan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Fixes: 57c36519 ("dm: fix clone_bio() to trigger blk_recount_segments()")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
parent 645efa84
...@@ -1336,7 +1336,11 @@ static int clone_bio(struct dm_target_io *tio, struct bio *bio, ...@@ -1336,7 +1336,11 @@ static int clone_bio(struct dm_target_io *tio, struct bio *bio,
return r; return r;
} }
bio_trim(clone, sector - clone->bi_iter.bi_sector, len); bio_advance(clone, to_bytes(sector - clone->bi_iter.bi_sector));
clone->bi_iter.bi_size = to_bytes(len);
if (bio_integrity(bio))
bio_integrity_trim(clone);
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment