Zach found this deadlock that would happen like this

btrfs_end_transaction <- reduce trans->use_count to 0
  btrfs_run_delayed_refs
    btrfs_cow_block
      find_free_extent
	btrfs_start_transaction <- increase trans->use_count to 1
          allocate chunk
	btrfs_end_transaction <- decrease trans->use_count to 0
	  btrfs_run_delayed_refs
	    lock tree block we are cowing above ^^

We need to only decrease trans->use_count if it is above 1, otherwise leave it
alone.  This will make nested trans be the only ones who decrease their added
ref, and will let us get rid of the trans->use_count++ hack if we have to commit
the transaction.  Thanks,

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Tested-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We didn't have a lock to protect the access to the delalloc inodes list, that is
we might access a empty delalloc inodes list if someone start flushing delalloc
inodes because the delalloc inodes were moved into a other list temporarily.
Fix it by wrapping the access with a lock.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

When we create a snapshot, we just need wait the ordered extents in
the source fs/file root, but because we use the global mutex to protect
this ordered extents list of the source fs/file root to avoid accessing
a empty list, if someone got the mutex to access the ordered extents list
of the other fs/file root, we had to wait.

This patch splits the above global mutex, now every fs/file root has
its own mutex to protect its own list.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock,
or we would make the tasks wait for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

generic/074 in xfstests failed sometimes because of the enospc error,
the reason of this problem is that we just reclaimed the space we need
from the reserved space for delalloc, and then tried to reserve the space,
but if some task did no-flush reservation between the above reclamation
and reservation,
	Task1			Task2
	shrink_delalloc()
	reclaim 1 block
	(The space that can
	 be reserved now is 1
	 block)
				do no-flush reservation
				reserve 1 block
				(The space that can
				 be reserved now is 0
				 block)
	reserving 1 block failed
the reservation of Task1 failed, but in fact, there was enough space to
reserve if we could reclaim more space before.

Fix this problem by the aggressive reclamation of the reserved delalloc
metadata space.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The reason is:
- The per-cpu counter has its own lock to protect itself.
- Here we needn't get a exact value.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

As the comment in the btrfs_direct_IO says, only the compressed pages need be
flush again to make sure they are on the disk, but the common pages needn't,
so we add a if statement to check if the inode has compressed pages or not,
if no, skip the flush.

And in order to prevent the write ranges from intersecting, we need wait for
the running ordered extents. But the current code waits for them twice, one
is done before the direct IO starts (in btrfs_wait_ordered_range()), the other
is before we get the blocks, it is unnecessary. because we can do the direct
IO without holding i_mutex, it means that the intersected ordered extents may
happen during the direct IO, the first wait can not avoid this problem. So we
use filemap_fdatawrite_range() instead of btrfs_wait_ordered_range() to remove
the first wait.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The tasks that wait for the IO_DONE flag just care about the io of the dirty
pages, so it is better to wake up them immediately after all the pages are
written, not the whole process of the io completes.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() moves all the list entries to a new list,
and then deals with them one by one. But if the other task invokes this
function at that time, it would get a empty list. It makes the enospc
error happens more early. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

If the snapshot creation happened after the nocow write but before the dirty
data flush, we would fail to flush the dirty data because of no space.

So we must keep track of when those nocow write operations start and when they
end, if there are nocow writers, the snapshot creators must wait. In order
to implement this function, I introduce btrfs_{start, end}_nocow_write(),
which is similar to mnt_{want,drop}_write().

These two functions are only used for nocow file write operations.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Add ftrace for btrfs_workqueue for further workqueue tunning.
This patch needs to applied after the workqueue replace patchset.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The new btrfs_workqueue still use open-coded function defition,
this patch will change them into btrfs_func_t type which is much the
same as kernel workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Btrfs send reads data from disk and then writes to a stream via pipe or
a file via flush.

Currently we're going to read each page a time, so every page results
in a disk read, which is not friendly to disks, esp. HDD.  Given that,
the performance can be gained by adding readahead for those pages.

Here is a quick test:
$ btrfs subvolume create send
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1G" send/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snap -r send ro
$ time "btrfs send ro -f /dev/null"

           w/o             w
real    1m37.527s       0m9.097s
user    0m0.122s        0m0.086s
sys     0m53.191s       0m12.857s
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

This has no functional change, only picks out the same part of two functions,
and makes it shared.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

When we're finishing processing of an inode, if we're dealing with a
directory inode that has a pending move/rename operation, we don't
need to send a utimes update instruction to the send stream, as we'll
do it later after doing the move/rename operation. Therefore we save
some time here building paths and doing btree lookups.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

When using prealloc extents, a file defragment operation may actually
fragment the file and increase the amount of data space used by the file.
This change fixes that behaviour.

Example:

$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt
$ cd /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c 'falloc 0 1048576' foobar && sync
$ xfs_io -c 'pwrite -S 0xff -b 100000 5000 100000' foobar
$ xfs_io -c 'pwrite -S 0xac -b 100000 200000 100000' foobar
$ xfs_io -c 'pwrite -S 0xe1 -b 100000 900000 100000' foobar && sync

Before defragmenting the file:

$ btrfs filesystem df /mnt
Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=1.25MiB
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00

$ btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sdb3
(...)
	item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15810 itemsize 53
		prealloc data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		prealloc data offset 0 nr 4096
	item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15757 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		extent data offset 4096 nr 102400 ram 1048576
		extent compression 0
	item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 106496) itemoff 15704 itemsize 53
		prealloc data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		prealloc data offset 106496 nr 90112
	item 9 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 196608) itemoff 15651 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		extent data offset 196608 nr 106496 ram 1048576
		extent compression 0
	item 10 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 303104) itemoff 15598 itemsize 53
		prealloc data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		prealloc data offset 303104 nr 593920
	item 11 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 897024) itemoff 15545 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		extent data offset 897024 nr 106496 ram 1048576
		extent compression 0
	item 12 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 1003520) itemoff 15492 itemsize 53
		prealloc data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		prealloc data offset 1003520 nr 45056
(...)

Now defragmenting the file results in more data space used than before:

$ btrfs filesystem defragment -f foobar && sync
$ btrfs filesystem df /mnt
Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=1.55MiB
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00

And the corresponding file extent items are now no longer perfectly sequential
as before, and we're now needlessly using more space from data block groups:

$ btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sdb3
(...)
	item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15810 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 1048576
		extent compression 0
	item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15757 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 13893632 nr 102400
		extent data offset 0 nr 102400 ram 102400
		extent compression 0
	item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 106496) itemoff 15704 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		extent data offset 106496 nr 90112 ram 1048576
		extent compression 0
	item 9 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 196608) itemoff 15651 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 13996032 nr 106496
		extent data offset 0 nr 106496 ram 106496
		extent compression 0
	item 10 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 303104) itemoff 15598 itemsize 53
		prealloc data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		prealloc data offset 303104 nr 593920
	item 11 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 897024) itemoff 15545 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 14102528 nr 106496
		extent data offset 0 nr 106496 ram 106496
		extent compression 0
	item 12 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 1003520) itemoff 15492 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 1048576
		extent data offset 1003520 nr 45056 ram 1048576
		extent compression 0
(...)

With this change, the above example will no longer cause allocation of new data
space nor change the sequentiality of the file extents, that is, defragment will
be effectless, leaving all extent items pointing to the extent starting at disk
byte 12845056.

In a 20Gb filesystem I had, mounted with the autodefrag option and 20 files of
400Mb each, initially consisting of a single prealloc extent of 400Mb, having
random writes happening at a low rate, lead to a total of over ~17Gb of data
space used, not far from eventually reaching an ENOSPC state.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

When the defrag flag BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_START_IO is set and compression
enabled, we weren't flushing completely, as writing compressed extents
is a 2 steps process, one to compress the data and another one to write
the compressed data to disk.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Since the "_struct" suffix is mainly used for distinguish the differnt
btrfs_work between the original and the newly created one,
there is no need using the suffix since all btrfs_workers are changed
into btrfs_workqueue.

Also this patch fixed some codes whose code style is changed due to the
too long "_struct" suffix.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Since all the btrfs_worker is replaced with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue, the old codes can be easily remove.
Signed-off-by: Quwenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->scrub_* with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->qgroup_rescan_worker with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->delayed_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->fixup_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->readahead_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->cache_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->rmw_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->endio_* workqueues with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Replace the fs_info->submit_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Much like the fs_info->workers, replace the fs_info->submit_workers
use the same btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Much like the fs_info->workers, replace the fs_info->delalloc_workers
use the same btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Use the newly created btrfs_workqueue_struct to replace the original
fs_info->workers
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The original btrfs_workers has thresholding functions to dynamically
create or destroy kthreads.

Though there is no such function in kernel workqueue because the worker
is not created manually, we can still use the workqueue_set_max_active
to simulated the behavior, mainly to achieve a better HDD performance by
setting a high threshold on submit_workers.
(Sadly, no resource can be saved)

So in this patch, extra workqueue pending counters are introduced to
dynamically change the max active of each btrfs_workqueue_struct, hoping
to restore the behavior of the original thresholding function.

Also, workqueue_set_max_active use a mutex to protect workqueue_struct,
which is not meant to be called too frequently, so a new interval
mechanism is applied, that will only call workqueue_set_max_active after
a count of work is queued. Hoping to balance both the random and
sequence performance on HDD.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Add high priority function to btrfs_workqueue.

This is implemented by embedding a btrfs_workqueue into a
btrfs_workqueue and use some helper functions to differ the normal
priority wq and high priority wq.
So the high priority wq is completely independent from the normal
workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Use kernel workqueue to implement a new btrfs_workqueue_struct, which
has the ordering execution feature like the btrfs_worker.

The func is executed in a concurrency way, and the
ordred_func/ordered_free is executed in the sequence them are queued
after the corresponding func is done.

The new btrfs_workqueue works much like the original one, one workqueue
for normal work and a list for ordered work.
When a work is queued, ordered work will be added to the list and helper
function will be queued into the workqueue.
The helper function will execute a normal work and then check and execute as many
ordered work as possible in the sequence they were queued.

At this patch, high priority work queue or thresholding is not added yet.
The high priority feature and thresholding will be added in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The struct async_sched is not used by any codes and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

It is really unnecessary to search tree again for @gen, @mode and @rdev
in the case of REG inodes' creation, as we've got btrfs_inode_item in sctx,
and @gen, @mode and @rdev can easily be fetched.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

We can not release the reserved metadata space for the first write if we
find the write position is pre-allocated. Because the kernel might write
the data on the disk before we do the second write but after the can-nocow
check, if we release the space for the first write, we might fail to update
the metadata because of no space.

Fix this problem by end nocow write if there is dirty data in the range whose
space is pre-allocated.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The write range may not be sector-aligned, for example:

       |--------|--------|	<- write range, sector-unaligned, size: 2blocks
  |--------|--------|--------|  <- correct lock range, size: 3blocks

But according to the old code, we used the size of write range to calculate
the lock range directly, not considered the offset, we would get a wrong lock
range:

       |--------|--------|	<- write range, sector-unaligned, size: 2blocks
  |--------|--------|		<- wrong lock range, size: 2blocks

And besides that, the old code also had the same problem when calculating
the real write size. Correct them.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>