- 22 Mar, 2022 40 commits
-
-
Yang Yang authored
When faults in from swap what used to be a KSM page and that page had been swapped in before, system has to make a copy, and leaves remerging the pages to a later pass of ksmd. That is not good for performace, we'd better to reduce this kind of copy. There are some ways to reduce it, for example lessen swappiness or madvise(, , MADV_MERGEABLE) range. So add this event to support doing this tuning. Just like this patch: "mm, THP, swap: add THP swapping out fallback counting". Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220113023839.758845-1-yang.yang29@zte.com.cnSigned-off-by:
Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by:
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Saravanan D <saravanand@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Johannes Weiner authored
Once upon a time, all swapins counted toward memory pressure[1]. Then Joonsoo introduced workingset detection for anonymous pages and we gained the ability to distinguish hot from cold swapins[2][3]. But we failed to update swap_readpage() accordingly, and now we account partial memory pressure in the swapin path of cold memory. Not for all situations - which adds more inconsistency: paths using the conventional submit_bio() and lock_page() route will not see much pressure - unless storage itself is heavily congested and the bio submissions stall. ZRAM and ZSWAP do most of the work directly from swap_readpage() and will see all swapins reflected as pressure. IOW, a workload doing cold swapins could see little to no pressure reported with on-disk swap, but potentially high pressure with a zram or zswap backend. That confuses any psi-based health monitoring, load shedding, proactive reclaim, or userspace OOM killing schemes that might be in place for the workload. Restore consistency by making all swapin stall accounting conditional on the page actually being part of the workingset. [1] commit 93779069 ("mm/page_io.c: annotate refault stalls from swap_readpage") [2] commit aae466b0 ("mm/swap: implement workingset detection for anonymous LRU") [3] commit cad8320b ("mm/swap: don't SetPageWorkingset unconditionally during swapin") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220214214921.419687-1-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by:
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reported-by:
CGEL <cgel.zte@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Huang Ying authored
If the NUMA balancing isn't used to optimize the page placement among sockets but only among memory types, the hot pages in the fast memory node couldn't be migrated (promoted) to anywhere. So it's unnecessary to scan the pages in the fast memory node via changing their PTE/PMD mapping to be PROT_NONE. So that the page faults could be avoided too. In the test, if only the memory tiering NUMA balancing mode is enabled, the number of the NUMA balancing hint faults for the DRAM node is reduced to almost 0 with the patch. While the benchmark score doesn't change visibly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221084529.1052339-4-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by:
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Suggested-by:
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Tested-by:
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by:
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by:
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Huang Ying authored
With the advent of various new memory types, some machines will have multiple types of memory, e.g. DRAM and PMEM (persistent memory). The memory subsystem of these machines can be called memory tiering system, because the performance of the different types of memory are usually different. In such system, because of the memory accessing pattern changing etc, some pages in the slow memory may become hot globally. So in this patch, the NUMA balancing mechanism is enhanced to optimize the page placement among the different memory types according to hot/cold dynamically. In a typical memory tiering system, there are CPUs, fast memory and slow memory in each physical NUMA node. The CPUs and the fast memory will be put in one logical node (called fast memory node), while the slow memory will be put in another (faked) logical node (called slow memory node). That is, the fast memory is regarded as local while the slow memory is regarded as remote. So it's possible for the recently accessed pages in the slow memory node to be promoted to the fast memory node via the existing NUMA balancing mechanism. The original NUMA balancing mechanism will stop to migrate pages if the free memory of the target node becomes below the high watermark. This is a reasonable policy if there's only one memory type. But this makes the original NUMA balancing mechanism almost do not work to optimize page placement among different memory types. Details are as follows. It's the common cases that the working-set size of the workload is larger than the size of the fast memory nodes. Otherwise, it's unnecessary to use the slow memory at all. So, there are almost always no enough free pages in the fast memory nodes, so that the globally hot pages in the slow memory node cannot be promoted to the fast memory node. To solve the issue, we have 2 choices as follows, a. Ignore the free pages watermark checking when promoting hot pages from the slow memory node to the fast memory node. This will create some memory pressure in the fast memory node, thus trigger the memory reclaiming. So that, the cold pages in the fast memory node will be demoted to the slow memory node. b. Define a new watermark called wmark_promo which is higher than wmark_high, and have kswapd reclaiming pages until free pages reach such watermark. The scenario is as follows: when we want to promote hot-pages from a slow memory to a fast memory, but fast memory's free pages would go lower than high watermark with such promotion, we wake up kswapd with wmark_promo watermark in order to demote cold pages and free us up some space. So, next time we want to promote hot-pages we might have a chance of doing so. The choice "a" may create high memory pressure in the fast memory node. If the memory pressure of the workload is high, the memory pressure may become so high that the memory allocation latency of the workload is influenced, e.g. the direct reclaiming may be triggered. The choice "b" works much better at this aspect. If the memory pressure of the workload is high, the hot pages promotion will stop earlier because its allocation watermark is higher than that of the normal memory allocation. So in this patch, choice "b" is implemented. A new zone watermark (WMARK_PROMO) is added. Which is larger than the high watermark and can be controlled via watermark_scale_factor. In addition to the original page placement optimization among sockets, the NUMA balancing mechanism is extended to be used to optimize page placement according to hot/cold among different memory types. So the sysctl user space interface (numa_balancing) is extended in a backward compatible way as follow, so that the users can enable/disable these functionality individually. The sysctl is converted from a Boolean value to a bits field. The definition of the flags is, - 0: NUMA_BALANCING_DISABLED - 1: NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL - 2: NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING We have tested the patch with the pmbench memory accessing benchmark with the 80:20 read/write ratio and the Gauss access address distribution on a 2 socket Intel server with Optane DC Persistent Memory Model. The test results shows that the pmbench score can improve up to 95.9%. Thanks Andrew Morton to help fix the document format error. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221084529.1052339-3-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Huang Ying authored
Patch series "NUMA balancing: optimize memory placement for memory tiering system", v13 With the advent of various new memory types, some machines will have multiple types of memory, e.g. DRAM and PMEM (persistent memory). The memory subsystem of these machines can be called memory tiering system, because the performance of the different types of memory are different. After commit c221c0b0 ("device-dax: "Hotplug" persistent memory for use like normal RAM"), the PMEM could be used as the cost-effective volatile memory in separate NUMA nodes. In a typical memory tiering system, there are CPUs, DRAM and PMEM in each physical NUMA node. The CPUs and the DRAM will be put in one logical node, while the PMEM will be put in another (faked) logical node. To optimize the system overall performance, the hot pages should be placed in DRAM node. To do that, we need to identify the hot pages in the PMEM node and migrate them to DRAM node via NUMA migration. In the original NUMA balancing, there are already a set of existing mechanisms to identify the pages recently accessed by the CPUs in a node and migrate the pages to the node. So we can reuse these mechanisms to build the mechanisms to optimize the page placement in the memory tiering system. This is implemented in this patchset. At the other hand, the cold pages should be placed in PMEM node. So, we also need to identify the cold pages in the DRAM node and migrate them to PMEM node. In commit 26aa2d19 ("mm/migrate: demote pages during reclaim"), a mechanism to demote the cold DRAM pages to PMEM node under memory pressure is implemented. Based on that, the cold DRAM pages can be demoted to PMEM node proactively to free some memory space on DRAM node to accommodate the promoted hot PMEM pages. This is implemented in this patchset too. We have tested the solution with the pmbench memory accessing benchmark with the 80:20 read/write ratio and the Gauss access address distribution on a 2 socket Intel server with Optane DC Persistent Memory Model. The test results shows that the pmbench score can improve up to 95.9%. This patch (of 3): In a system with multiple memory types, e.g. DRAM and PMEM, the CPU and DRAM in one socket will be put in one NUMA node as before, while the PMEM will be put in another NUMA node as described in the description of the commit c221c0b0 ("device-dax: "Hotplug" persistent memory for use like normal RAM"). So, the NUMA balancing mechanism will identify all PMEM accesses as remote access and try to promote the PMEM pages to DRAM. To distinguish the number of the inter-type promoted pages from that of the inter-socket migrated pages. A new vmstat count is added. The counter is per-node (count in the target node). So this can be used to identify promotion imbalance among the NUMA nodes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220301085329.3210428-1-ying.huang@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221084529.1052339-1-ying.huang@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221084529.1052339-2-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Hari Bathini authored
With commit a4e92ce8 ("powerpc/fadump: Reservationless firmware assisted dump"), Linux kernel's Contiguous Memory Allocator (CMA) based reservation was introduced in fadump. That change was aimed at using CMA to let applications utilize the memory reserved for fadump while blocking it from being used for kernel pages. The assumption was, even if CMA activation fails for whatever reason, the memory still remains reserved to avoid it from being used for kernel pages. But commit 072355c1 ("mm/cma: expose all pages to the buddy if activation of an area fails") breaks this assumption as it started exposing all pages to buddy allocator on CMA activation failure. It led to warning messages like below while running crash-utility on vmcore of a kernel having above two commits: crash: seek error: kernel virtual address: <from reserved region> To fix this problem, opt out from exposing pages to buddy allocator on CMA activation failure for fadump reserved memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Hari Bathini authored
Patch series "powerpc/fadump: handle CMA activation failure appropriately", v3. Commit 072355c1 ("mm/cma: expose all pages to the buddy if activation of an area fails") started exposing all pages to buddy allocator on CMA activation failure. But there can be CMA users that want to handle the reserved memory differently on CMA allocation failure. Provide an option to opt out from exposing pages to buddy for such cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
-
Hugh Dickins authored
Migration entries do not contribute to a page's reference count: move __split_huge_pmd_locked()'s page_ref_add() into pmd_migration's else block (along with the page_count() check - a page is quite likely to have reference count frozen to 0 when a migration entry is found). This will fix a very rare anonymous memory leak, after a split_huge_pmd() raced with an anon split_huge_page() or an anon THP migrate_pages(): since the wrongly raised refcount stopped the page (perhaps small, perhaps huge, depending on when the race hit) from ever being freed. At first I thought there were worse risks, from prematurely unfreezing a frozen page: but now think that would only affect page cache pages, which do not come this way (except for anonymous pages in swap cache, perhaps). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/84792468-f512-e48f-378c-e34c3641e97@google.com Fixes: ec0abae6 ("mm/thp: fix __split_huge_pmd_locked() for migration PMD") Signed-off-by:
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reviewed-by:
-
andrew.yang authored
When memory is tight, system may start to compact memory for large continuous memory demands. If one process tries to lock a memory page that is being locked and isolated for compaction, it may wait a long time or even forever. This is because compaction will perform non-atomic PG_Isolated clear while holding page lock, this may overwrite PG_waiters set by the process that can't obtain the page lock and add itself to the waiting queue to wait for the lock to be unlocked. CPU1 CPU2 lock_page(page); (successful) lock_page(); (failed) __ClearPageIsolated(page); SetPageWaiters(page) (may be overwritten) unlock_page(page); The solution is to not perform non-atomic operation on page flags while holding page lock. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220315030515.20263-1-andrew.yang@mediatek.comSigned-off-by:andrew.yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "William Kucharski" <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Tang <nicholas.tang@mediatek.com> Cc: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Huang Ying authored
In commit ac16ec83 ("mm: migrate: support multiple target nodes demotion"), after the first demotion target node is found, we will continue to check the next candidate obtained via find_next_best_node(). This is to find all demotion target nodes with same NUMA distance. But one side effect of find_next_best_node() is that the candidate node returned will be set in "used" parameter, even if the candidate node isn't passed in the following NUMA distance checking, the candidate node will not be used as demotion target node for the following nodes. For example, for system as follows, node distances: node 0 1 2 3 0: 10 21 17 28 1: 21 10 28 17 2: 17 28 10 28 3: 28 17 28 10 when we establish demotion target node for node 0, in the first round node 2 is added to the demotion target node set. Then in the second round, node 3 is checked and failed because distance(0, 3) > distance(0, 2). But node 3 is set in "used" nodemask too. When we establish demotion target node for node 1, there is no available node. This is wrong, node 3 should be set as the demotion target of node 1. To fix this, if the candidate node is failed to pass the distance checking, it will be cleared in "used" nodemask. So that it can be used for the following node. The bug can be reproduced and fixed with this patch on a 2 socket server machine with DRAM and PMEM. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220128055940.1792614-1-ying.huang@intel.com Fixes: ac16ec83 ("mm: migrate: support multiple target nodes demotion") Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
oom_cpuset_eligible() is always called when !is_memcg_oom(). Remove this unnecessary check. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220224115933.20154-1-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Acked-by:
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Hugh Dickins authored
v2.6.34 commit 9d8cebd4 ("mm: fix mbind vma merge problem") introduced vma_merge() to mbind_range(); but unlike madvise, mlock and mprotect, it put a "continue" to next vma where its precedents go to update flags on current vma before advancing: that left vma with the wrong setting in the infamous vma_merge() case 8. v3.10 commit 1444f92c ("mm: merging memory blocks resets mempolicy") tried to fix that in vma_adjust(), without fully understanding the issue. v3.11 commit 3964acd0 ("mm: mempolicy: fix mbind_range() && vma_adjust() interaction") reverted that, and went about the fix in the right way, but chose to optimize out an unnecessary mpol_dup() with a prior mpol_equal() test. But on tmpfs, that also pessimized out the vital call to its ->set_policy(), leaving the new mbind unenforced. The user visible effect was that the pages got allocated on the local node (happened to be 0), after the mbind() caller had specifically asked for them to be allocated on node 1. There was not any page migration involved in the case reported: the pages simply got allocated on the wrong node. Just delete that optimization now (though it could be made conditional on vma not having a set_policy). Also remove the "next" variable: it turned out to be blameless, but also pointless. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/319e4db9-64ae-4bca-92f0-ade85d342ff@google.com Fixes: 3964acd0 ("mm: mempolicy: fix mbind_range() && vma_adjust() interaction") Signed-off-by:
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Baolin Wang authored
As Steven suggested [1], we should access the pointers from the trace event to avoid dereferencing them to the tracepoint function when the tracepoint is disabled. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/11/3/409 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4cd393b4d57f8f01ed72c001509b28e3a3b1a8c1.1646985115.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by:
-
Charan Teja Kalla authored
Commit b518154e ("mm/vmscan: protect the workingset on anonymous LRU") requires to look twice for both mapped anon/file pages are used more than once to take the decission of reclaim or activation. Correct the documentation accordingly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1646925640-21324-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.comSigned-off-by:
Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored
Commit 68d48e6a ("mm: workingset: add vmstat counter for shadow nodes") introduced an IRQ-off check to ensure that a lock is held which also disabled interrupts. This does not work the same way on PREEMPT_RT because none of the locks, that are held, disable interrupts. Replace this check with a lockdep assert which ensures that the lock is held. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220301122143.1521823-3-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Marcelo Tosatti authored
On systems that run FIFO:1 applications that busy loop, any SCHED_OTHER task that attempts to execute on such a CPU (such as work threads) will not be scheduled, which leads to system hangs. Commit d479960e ("mm: disable LRU pagevec during the migration temporarily") relies on queueing work items on all online CPUs to ensure visibility of lru_disable_count. To fix this, replace the usage of work items with synchronize_rcu, which provides the same guarantees. Readers of lru_disable_count are protected by either disabling preemption or rcu_read_lock: preempt_disable, local_irq_disable [bh_lru_lock()] rcu_read_lock [rt_spin_lock CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT] preempt_disable [local_lock !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT] Since v5.1 kernel, synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to wait on preempt_disable() regions of code. So any CPU which sees lru_disable_count = 0 will have exited the critical section when synchronize_rcu() returns. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yin7hDxdt0s/x+fp@fuller.cnetSigned-off-by:
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com> Acked-by:
-
Waiman Long authored
Since commit 2c80cd57 ("mm/list_lru.c: fix list_lru_count_node() to be race free"), we are tracking the total number of lru entries in a list_lru_node in its nr_items field. In the case of memcg_reparent_list_lru_node(), there is nothing to be done if nr_items is 0. We don't even need to take the nlru->lock as no new lru entry could be added by a racing list_lru_add() to the draining src_idx memcg at this point. On systems that serve a lot of containers, it is possible that there can be thousands of list_lru's present due to the fact that each container may mount its own container specific filesystems. As a typical container uses only a few cpus, it is likely that only the list_lru_node that contains those cpus will be utilized while the rests may be empty. In other words, there can be a lot of list_lru_node with 0 nr_items. By skipping a lock/unlock operation and loading a cacheline from memcg_lrus, a sizeable number of cpu cycles can be saved. That can be substantial if we are talking about thousands of list_lru_node's with 0 nr_items. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309144000.1470138-1-longman@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Hugh Dickins authored
__isolate_lru_page_prepare() conflates two unrelated functions, with the flags to one disjoint from the flags to the other; and hides some of the important checks outside of isolate_migratepages_block(), where the sequence is better to be visible. It comes from the days of lumpy reclaim, before compaction, when the combination made more sense. Move what's needed by mm/compaction.c isolate_migratepages_block() inline there, and what's needed by mm/vmscan.c isolate_lru_pages() inline there. Shorten "isolate_mode" to "mode", so the sequence of conditions is easier to read. Declare a "mapping" variable, to save one call to page_mapping() (but not another: calling again after page is locked is necessary). Simplify isolate_lru_pages() with a "move_to" list pointer. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/879d62a8-91cc-d3c6-fb3b-69768236df68@google.comSigned-off-by:
Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Hugh Dickins authored
PF_SWAPWRITE has been redundant since v3.2 commit ee72886d ("mm: vmscan: do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim"). Coincidentally, NeilBrown's current patch "remove inode_congested()" deletes may_write_to_inode(), which appeared to be the one function which took notice of PF_SWAPWRITE. But if you study the old logic, and the conditions under which may_write_to_inode() was called, you discover that flag and function have been pointless for a decade. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/75e80e7-742d-e3bd-531-614db8961e4@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Guo Zhengkui authored
Fix following coccicheck warning: tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c:556:23-24: WARNING this kind of initialization is deprecated `unsigned long page_nr = *(&page_nr)` has the same form of uninitialized_var() macro. I remove the redundant assignement. It has been tested with gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0. The patch which removed uninitialized_var() is: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20121028102007.GA7547@gmail.com/ And there is very few "/* GCC */" comments in the Linux kernel code now. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220304082333.9252-1-guozhengkui@vivo.comSigned-off-by:
Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Nadav Amit authored
Userfaultfd is supposed to provide the full address (i.e., unmasked) of the faulting access back to userspace. However, that is not the case for quite some time. Even running "userfaultfd_demo" from the userfaultfd man page provides the wrong output (and contradicts the man page). Notice that "UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT event" shows the masked address (7fc5e30b3000) and not the first read address (0x7fc5e30b300f). Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fc5e30b3000 fault_handler_thread(): poll() returns: nready = 1; POLLIN = 1; POLLERR = 0 UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT event: flags = 0; address = 7fc5e30b3000 (uffdio_copy.copy returned 4096) Read address 0x7fc5e30b300f in main(): A Read address 0x7fc5e30b340f in main(): A Read address 0x7fc5e30b380f in main(): A Read address 0x7fc5e30b3c0f in main(): A The exact address is useful for various reasons and specifically for prefetching decisions. If it is known that the memory is populated by certain objects whose size is not page-aligned, then based on the faulting address, the uffd-monitor can decide whether to prefetch and prefault the adjacent page. This bug has been for quite some time in the kernel: since commit 1a29d85e ("mm: use vmf->address instead of of vmf->virtual_address") vmf->virtual_address"), which dates back to 2016. A concern has been raised that existing userspace application might rely on the old/wrong behavior in which the address is masked. Therefore, it was suggested to provide the masked address unless the user explicitly asks for the exact address. Add a new userfaultfd feature UFFD_FEATURE_EXACT_ADDRESS to direct userfaultfd to provide the exact address. Add a new "real_address" field to vmf to hold the unmasked address. Provide the address to userspace accordingly. Initialize real_address in various code-paths to be consistent with address, even when it is not used, to be on the safe side. [namit@vmware.com: initialize real_address on all code paths, per Jan] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220226022655.350562-1-namit@vmware.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo in comment, per Jan] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218041003.3508-1-namit@vmware.comSigned-off-by:
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Acked-by:
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
We can pass FOLL_GET | FOLL_DUMP to follow_page directly to simplify the code a bit in add_page_for_migration and split_huge_pages_pid. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220311072002.35575-1-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Howells authored
Export PageHeadHuge() - it's used by folio_test_hugetlb() and thence by such as folio_file_page() and folio_contains(). Matthew suggested I use the first of those instead of doing the same calculation manually - but I can't call it from a module. Kirill suggested rearranging things to put it in a header, but that introduces header dependencies because of where constants are defined. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/EXPORT_SYMBOL/EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL/, per Christoph] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2494562.1646054576@warthog.procyon.org.uk Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163707085314.3221130.14783857863702203440.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/Signed-off-by:
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Use helper macro __ATTR_RW to define HSTATE_ATTR to make code more clear. Minor readability improvement. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220222112731.33479-1-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
Recently introduced code allows numa nodes to be specified on the kernel command line for hugetlb allocations or CMA reservations. The node values are user specified and used as indicies into arrays. This generated the following smatch warnings: mm/hugetlb.c:4170 hugepages_setup() warn: potential spectre issue 'default_hugepages_in_node' [w] mm/hugetlb.c:4172 hugepages_setup() warn: potential spectre issue 'parsed_hstate->max_huge_pages_node' [w] mm/hugetlb.c:6898 cmdline_parse_hugetlb_cma() warn: potential spectre issue 'hugetlb_cma_size_in_node' [w] (local cap) Clean up by using array_index_nospec to sanitize array indicies. The routine cmdline_parse_hugetlb_cma has the same overflow/truncation issue addressed in [1]. That is also fixed with this change. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220209134018.8242-1-liuyuntao10@huawei.com/ As Michal pointed out, this is unlikely to be exploitable because it is __init code. But the patch suppresses the warnings. [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: v2] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218212946.35441-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220217234218.192885-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB config has duplicate definitions on platforms that subscribe it. Instead make it a generic config option which can be selected on applicable platforms when required. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1643718465-4324-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muchun Song authored
The vmemmap_remap_free/alloc are relevant to HugeTLB, so move those functiongs to the scope of CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-6-songmuchun@bytedance.comSigned-off-by:
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@amazon.com> Cc: Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Muchun Song authored
Since the head vmemmap page frame associated with each HugeTLB page is reused, we should hide the PG_head flag of tail struct page from the user. Add a tese case to check whether it is work properly. The test steps are as follows. 1) alloc 2MB hugeTLB 2) get each page frame 3) apply those APIs in each page frame 4) Those APIs work completely the same as before. Reading the flags of a page by /proc/kpageflags is done in stable_page_flags(), which has invoked PageHead(), PageTail(), PageCompound() and compound_head(). If those APIs work properly, the head page must have 15 and 17 bits set. And tail pages must have 16 and 17 bits set but 15 bit unset. Those flags are checked in check_page_flags(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-5-songmuchun@bytedance.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muchun Song authored
The init_mm.page_table_lock is used to protect kernel page tables, we can use it to serialize splitting vmemmap PMD mappings instead of mmap write lock, which can increase the concurrency of vmemmap_remap_free(). Actually, It increase the concurrency between allocations of HugeTLB pages. But it is not the only benefit. There are a lot of users of mmap read lock of init_mm. The mmap write lock is holding through vmemmap_remap_free(), removing mmap write lock usage to make it does not affect other users of mmap read lock. It is not making anything worse and always a win to move. Now the kernel page table walker does not hold the page_table_lock when walking pmd entries. There may be consistency issue of a pmd entry, because pmd entry might change from a huge pmd entry to a PTE page table. There is only one user of kernel page table walker, namely ptdump. The ptdump already considers the consistency, which use a local variable to cache the value of pmd entry. But we also need to update ->action to ACTION_CONTINUE to make sure the walker does not walk every pte entry again when concurrent thread has split the huge pmd. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-4-songmuchun@bytedance.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muchun Song authored
The page_fixed_fake_head() is used throughout memory management and the conditional check requires checking a global variable, although the overhead of this check may be small, it increases when the memory cache comes under pressure. Also, the global variable will not be modified after system boot, so it is very appropriate to use static key machanism. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-3-songmuchun@bytedance.comSigned-off-by:
-
Muchun Song authored
Patch series "Free the 2nd vmemmap page associated with each HugeTLB page", v7. This series can minimize the overhead of struct page for 2MB HugeTLB pages significantly. It further reduces the overhead of struct page by 12.5% for a 2MB HugeTLB compared to the previous approach, which means 2GB per 1TB HugeTLB. It is a nice gain. Comments and reviews are welcome. Thanks. The main implementation and details can refer to the commit log of patch 1. In this series, I have changed the following four helpers, the following table shows the impact of the overhead of those helpers. +------------------+-----------------------+ | APIs | head page | tail page | +------------------+-----------+-----------+ | PageHead() | Y | N | +------------------+-----------+-----------+ | PageTail() | Y | N | +------------------+-----------+-----------+ | PageCompound() | N | N | +------------------+-----------+-----------+ | compound_head() | Y | N | +------------------+-----------+-----------+ Y: Overhead is increased. N: Overhead is _NOT_ increased. It shows that the overhead of those helpers on a tail page don't change between "hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on" and "hugetlb_free_vmemmap=off". But the overhead on a head page will be increased when "hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on" (except PageCompound()). So I believe that Matthew Wilcox's folio series will help with this. The users of PageHead() and PageTail() are much less than compound_head() and most users of PageTail() are VM_BUG_ON(), so I have done some tests about the overhead of compound_head() on head pages. I have tested the overhead of calling compound_head() on a head page, which is 2.11ns (Measure the call time of 10 million times compound_head(), and then average). For a head page whose address is not aligned with PAGE_SIZE or a non-compound page, the overhead of compound_head() is 2.54ns which is increased by 20%. For a head page whose address is aligned with PAGE_SIZE, the overhead of compound_head() is 2.97ns which is increased by 40%. Most pages are the former. I do not think the overhead is significant since the overhead of compound_head() itself is low. This patch (of 5): This patch minimizes the overhead of struct page for 2MB HugeTLB pages significantly. It further reduces the overhead of struct page by 12.5% for a 2MB HugeTLB compared to the previous approach, which means 2GB per 1TB HugeTLB (2MB type). After the feature of "Free sonme vmemmap pages of HugeTLB page" is enabled, the mapping of the vmemmap addresses associated with a 2MB HugeTLB page becomes the figure below. HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages) +-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+---> PG_head | | | 0 | -------------> | 0 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 1 | -------------> | 1 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 2 | ----------------^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | | 3 | ------------------+ | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | 4 | --------------------+ | | | | 2MB | +-----------+ | | | | | | 5 | ----------------------+ | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | 6 | ------------------------+ | | | +-----------+ | | | | 7 | --------------------------+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------+ As we can see, the 2nd vmemmap page frame (indexed by 1) is reused and remaped. However, the 2nd vmemmap page frame is also can be freed to the buddy allocator, then we can change the mapping from the figure above to the figure below. HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages) +-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+---> PG_head | | | 0 | -------------> | 0 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 1 | ---------------^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | | | 2 | -----------------+ | | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | | 3 | -------------------+ | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | 4 | ---------------------+ | | | | 2MB | +-----------+ | | | | | | 5 | -----------------------+ | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | 6 | -------------------------+ | | | +-----------+ | | | | 7 | ---------------------------+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------+ After we do this, all tail vmemmap pages (1-7) are mapped to the head vmemmap page frame (0). In other words, there are more than one page struct with PG_head associated with each HugeTLB page. We __know__ that there is only one head page struct, the tail page structs with PG_head are fake head page structs. We need an approach to distinguish between those two different types of page structs so that compound_head(), PageHead() and PageTail() can work properly if the parameter is the tail page struct but with PG_head. The following code snippet describes how to distinguish between real and fake head page struct. if (test_bit(PG_head, &page->flags)) { unsigned long head = READ_ONCE(page[1].compound_head); if (head & 1) { if (head == (unsigned long)page + 1) ==> head page struct else ==> tail page struct } else ==> head page struct } We can safely access the field of the @page[1] with PG_head because the @page is a compound page composed with at least two contiguous pages. [songmuchun@bytedance.com: restore lost comment changes] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-2-songmuchun@bytedance.comSigned-off-by: -
Miaohe Lin authored
user_shm_lock forgets to set allowed to 0 when get_ucounts fails. So the later user_shm_unlock might do the extra dec_rlimit_ucounts. Fix this by resetting allowed to 0. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220310132417.41189-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: d7c9e99a ("Reimplement RLIMIT_MEMLOCK on top of ucounts") Signed-off-by:
-
Vlastimil Babka authored
The mm/ directory can almost fully be built with W=1, which would help in local development. One remaining issue is missing prototype for should_fail_alloc_page(). Thus add it next to the should_failslab() prototype. Note the previous attempt by commit f7173090 ("mm/page_alloc: make should_fail_alloc_page() static") had to be reverted by commit 54aa3866 as it caused an unresolved symbol error with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220314165724.16071-1-vbabka@suse.czSigned-off-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
We can not really handle non-LRU movable pages in memory failure. Typically they are balloon, zsmalloc, etc. Assuming we run into a base (4K) non-LRU movable page, we could reach as far as identify_page_state(), it should not fall into any category except me_unknown. For the non-LRU compound movable pages, they could be taken for transhuge pages but it's unexpected to split non-LRU movable pages using split_huge_page_to_list in memory_failure. So we could just simply make non-LRU movable pages unhandlable to avoid these possible nasty cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Since commit 042c4f32323b ("mm/truncate: Inline invalidate_complete_page() into its one caller"), invalidate_inode_page() can invalidate the pages in the swap cache because the check of page->mapping != mapping is removed. But invalidate_inode_page() is not expected to deal with the pages in swap cache. Also non-lru movable page can reach here too. They're not page cache pages. Skip these pages by checking PageSwapCache and PageLRU. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: -
Miaohe Lin authored
Patch series "A few fixup patches for memory failure", v2. This series contains a few patches to fix the race with changing page compound page, make non-LRU movable pages unhandlable and so on. More details can be found in the respective changelogs. There is a race window where we got the compound_head, the hugetlb page could be freed to buddy, or even changed to another compound page just before we try to get hwpoison page. Think about the below race window: CPU 1 CPU 2 memory_failure_hugetlb struct page *head = compound_head(p); hugetlb page might be freed to buddy, or even changed to another compound page. get_hwpoison_page -- page is not what we want now... If this race happens, just bail out. Also MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_PAGE_SIZE is introduced to record this event. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s@/**@/*@, per Naoya Horiguchi] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
luofei authored
After successfully obtaining the reference count of the huge page, it is still necessary to call hwpoison_filter() to make a filter judgement, otherwise the filter hugepage will be unmaped and the related process may be killed. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220223082254.2769757-1-luofei@unicloud.comSigned-off-by:
luofei <luofei@unicloud.com> Reviewed-by:
-
luofei authored
When the hwpoison page meets the filter conditions, it should not be regarded as successful memory_failure() processing for mce handler, but should return a distinct value, otherwise mce handler regards the error page has been identified and isolated, which may lead to calling set_mce_nospec() to change page attribute, etc. Here memory_failure() return -EOPNOTSUPP to indicate that the error event is filtered, mce handler should not take any action for this situation and hwpoison injector should treat as correct. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220223082135.2769649-1-luofei@unicloud.comSigned-off-by:
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
memory_failure() can handle free buddy page. Support injecting hwpoison to free page by adding is_free_buddy_page check when hwpoison filter is disabled. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: export is_free_buddy_page() to modules] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218092052.3853-1-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
When we reach here, we're guaranteed to have non-compound page as thp is already splited. Remove this unnecessary PageTransTail check. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-9-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
