1. 31 Jul, 2015 4 commits
    • Jon Paul Maloy's avatar
      tipc: extend node FSM · 66996b6c
      Jon Paul Maloy authored
      In the next commit, we will move link synch/failover orchestration to
      the link aggregation level. In order to do this, we first need to extend
      the node FSM with two more states, NODE_SYNCHING and NODE_FAILINGOVER,
      plus four new events to enter and leave those states.
      
      This commit introduces this change, without yet making use of it.
      The node FSM now looks as follows:
      
                                 +-----------------------------------------+
                                 |                            PEER_DOWN_EVT|
                                 |                                         |
        +------------------------+----------------+                        |
        |SELF_DOWN_EVT           |                |                        |
        |                        |                |                        |
        |              +-----------+          +-----------+                |
        |              |NODE_      |          |NODE_      |                |
        |   +----------|FAILINGOVER|<---------|SYNCHING   |------------+   |
        |   |SELF_     +-----------+ FAILOVER_+-----------+    PEER_   |   |
        |   |DOWN_EVT   |         A  BEGIN_EVT A         |     DOWN_EVT|   |
        |   |           |         |            |         |             |   |
        |   |           |         |            |         |             |   |
        |   |           |FAILOVER_|FAILOVER_   |SYNCH_   |SYNCH_       |   |
        |   |           |END_EVT  |BEGIN_EVT   |BEGIN_EVT|END_EVT      |   |
        |   |           |         |            |         |             |   |
        |   |           |         |            |         |             |   |
        |   |           |        +--------------+        |             |   |
        |   |           +------->|   SELF_UP_   |<-------+             |   |
        |   |   +----------------|   PEER_UP    |------------------+   |   |
        |   |   |SELF_DOWN_EVT   +--------------+     PEER_DOWN_EVT|   |   |
        |   |   |                   A          A                   |   |   |
        |   |   |                   |          |                   |   |   |
        |   |   |        PEER_UP_EVT|          |SELF_UP_EVT        |   |   |
        |   |   |                   |          |                   |   |   |
        V   V   V                   |          |                   V   V   V
      +------------+       +-----------+    +-----------+       +------------+
      |SELF_DOWN_  |       |SELF_UP_   |    |PEER_UP_   |       |PEER_DOWN   |
      |PEER_LEAVING|<------|PEER_COMING|    |SELF_COMING|------>|SELF_LEAVING|
      +------------+ SELF_ +-----------+    +-----------+ PEER_ +------------+
             |       DOWN_EVT       A          A          DOWN_EVT     |
             |                      |          |                       |
             |                      |          |                       |
             |           SELF_UP_EVT|          |PEER_UP_EVT            |
             |                      |          |                       |
             |                      |          |                       |
             |PEER_DOWN_EVT       +--------------+        SELF_DOWN_EVT|
             +------------------->|  SELF_DOWN_  |<--------------------+
                                  |  PEER_DOWN   |
                                  +--------------+
      Tested-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      66996b6c
    • Jon Paul Maloy's avatar
      tipc: reverse call order for link_reset()->node_link_down() · 655fb243
      Jon Paul Maloy authored
      In many cases the call order when a link is reset goes as follows:
      tipc_node_xx()->tipc_link_reset()->tipc_node_link_down()
      
      This is not the right order if we want the node to be in control,
      so in this commit we change the order to:
      tipc_node_xx()->tipc_node_link_down()->tipc_link_reset()
      
      The fact that tipc_link_reset() now is called from only one
      location with a well-defined state will also facilitate later
      simplifications of tipc_link_reset() and the link FSM.
      Tested-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      655fb243
    • Jon Paul Maloy's avatar
      tipc: move all link_reset() calls to link aggregation level · 6144a996
      Jon Paul Maloy authored
      In line with our effort to let the node level have full control over
      its links, we want to move all link reset calls from link.c to node.c.
      Some of the calls can be moved by simply moving the calling function,
      when this is the right thing to do. For the remaining calls we use
      the now established technique of returning a TIPC_LINK_DOWN_EVT
      flag from tipc_link_rcv(), whereafter we perform the reset call when
      the call returns.
      
      This change serves as a preparation for the coming commits.
      Tested-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6144a996
    • Jon Paul Maloy's avatar
      tipc: eliminate function tipc_link_activate() · cbeb83ca
      Jon Paul Maloy authored
      The function tipc_link_activate() is redundant, since it mostly performs
      settings that have already been done in a preceding tipc_link_reset().
      
      There are three exceptions to this:
      - The actual state change to TIPC_LINK_WORKING. This should anyway be done
        in the FSM, and not in a separate function.
      - Registration of the link with the bearer. This should be done by the
        node, since we don't want the link to have any knowledge about its
        specific bearer.
      - Call to tipc_node_link_up() for user access registration. With the new
        role distribution between link aggregation and link level this becomes
        the wrong call order; tipc_node_link_up() should instead be called
        directly as a result of a TIPC_LINK_UP event, hence by the node itself.
      
      This commit implements those changes.
      Tested-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cbeb83ca
  2. 30 Jul, 2015 36 commits