- 23 Nov, 2007 40 commits
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
pre-100 (on ftp.kernel.org now), moves the dcache shrinking into the regular memory de-allocation loop, and while the exact shrinking speed is probably completely off, it should be able to react much better to small-memory machines than the hardcoded shrink did.. Also, for those that appear to still have SMP interrupt stability problems, Ingo pointed out that we may have problems with PCI level-triggered interrupts. Could those people please test an additional small patch that involves moving the "ack_APIC_irq();" inside arch/i386/kernel/irq.c: do_ioapic_IRQ() from the top of the function to the very bottom of that function (that will move it to outside the irq controller lock, but it should actually be perfectly ok in this case). Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
There's a new pre-patch on ftp.kernel.org, that does: - the networking fixes that didn't get into 98 due to various mess-ups - mtrr patches are there by default - all the irq fixes we know of to date are there (and hopefully even the ne2000 things should work with the SELF-IPI change) - various documentation updates and bugfixes (the best way to know that a stable kernel is approaching is to notice that somebody starts to spellcheck the kernel - it has so far never failed) in short, all known bugs should be fixed, but hey, what else is new? Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
a cleanup of my previous patches wrt irq handling, and also fixes a real bug (we used to ACK the io-apic outside the irq-controller lock, which meant that the ack's we did and "ipi_pending[]" might have gotten out of sync - which could certainly have resulted in bad behaviour). This also re-enables the code that replays interrupts in enable_irq(), because it should be ok now that the rest of the code is cleaned up. People that had the earlier problem with locking up with floppies, please test: if this re-introduces the lockup, please just #if 0 out all the code inside trigger_pending_irqs(), and send me a note telling me that that code still doesn't work. Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
I just released a fairly small patch to 97 to bring it up to 98. I've gotten a lot of patches in the mail for the last week, and I've been ignoring most of them for obvious reasons. They aren't in any in-queue, you can more-or-less consider them lost - but don't resend them all immediately, because if I get another huge batch of patches then I'll just have to ignore them again. We're going slow and easy, and the plan is to not only keep me sane in the midst of all the diapers, but I'll also at the same time take the opportunity to actually enforce the feature-freeze. You've known about it for a long time, _tough_. Anyway, 2.1.98 _should_ fix: - the IDE/SCSI lockups. The irq enable/disable code was broken, and could do some really bad things. This tended to lock up the machine if you accessed your IDE disks heavily, or in particular if you had a mixture of IDE and SCSI and used them at the same time. Tell me if you still have problems - I'm sure there are still bugs left, and I want to hear about them. - memory management especially on small-memory machines. I think I made a good change to the allocation logic, and I'm hoping it will fix the bad bahevaiour on those wimpy machines that all you losers out there are using that have less than half a Gig of RAM. It certainly still works fine on my machine, and I'm certainly still too lazy to test it out on anything smaller. There's a few other updates too: the asm constraints are fixed, so it should compile again with other compiler versions than the particular one I happen to be using. And some of the SCSI drivers have been updated a bit. There's been a lot of discussion and patches on capabilities, and I haven't applied them yet, I'll let them simmer a bit. Similarly, I've seen so many pathes to kmod that my head is spinning, and as I don't use modules myself I'd really like to get feedback from users about the different patches, so that maybe I'll get something that everybody can agree on as acceptable. Right now I don't know which patch I should even begin looking at. Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
I made a 2.1.97 release, in order to synch up with some large patch-sets I've gotten (non-x86 architecture updates). But due to the new baby this really hasn't been through my usual exhaustive stress-test ("make bzImage" + "boot") so buyer beware. Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
This is finally the kind of feature-freeze patch I like: it only contains fixes for outright bugs. The fixes are: - SMP-safe disk drivers (more on this below) - various PCI fixes: /proc/bus/pci works again, and it should compile and work on Alpha with TGA. - parport interrupt detection uses the standard probe routines, and doesn't leave bogus "probe" entries hanging around to confuse people (and make other device registration fail) - the ever-popular PCI ne netdriver fix - the getcwd() system call works again. - "mb()" does the right thing on x86 too. Few drivers use it, but more of them should. Right now there are drivers that depend on luck making sure that the memory accesses will be in the same order outside the CPU as inside it. The conceptually big one is the SMP-safe disk driver change: it's not a very big patch, but it's fairly subtle. And it still requires help from the disk drivers themselves, although all of them should be safe in UP, and I made sure the BusLogic and the NCR driver are safe on SMP. The change is really a change in locking defaults: we used to default to no locking, and depended on the disk driver getting the locking right. None of them did so on SMP, for understandable reasons (there really wasn't any support for getting it right). The new default is to do the locking for the driver, and the driver actually has to do some work if it wants to do anything outside the lock. This has the obvious advantage that it _defaults_ to being safe, and people who know what they are doing can choose to thread the driver if they want to. The only change needed to drivers is to make sure they get the lock on an interrupt, which usually involves just doing the following around the low/level interrupt handler (the same handler that you register using "request_irq()"): void handle_irq(int irq, void *dev, struct pt_regs *regs) { + unsigned long flags; + spin_lock_irqsave(&io_request_lock, flags); ... call to the proper action routines ... + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock, flags); } which guarantees that everything inside the driver is correctly locked from the outside world (with the exception of ioctl's etc things that the driver traps - they need to be protected too). Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
2.1.93 is out there. It is broken on other platforms than x86, because I had to move some initialization code around, but this shoul dbe very easy to fix (moving the device init code later makes a _lot_ of things easier: the system is essentially up and running, and "kmalloc()" etc actually works). Now the PCI init code actually has the full SMP knowledge, which it needs in order to get the interrupt mapping stuff right (for example - it might eventually need it for other reasons too). The PCI code has generally been cleaned up - thanks to Martin Mares (the PCI cleanup is what forced me to do the other changes - anything else would simply have been too ugly). 2.1.93 should also fix the stupid things in 92 (modules don't load due to missing symbols, and NULL pointer dereferences in /proc under certain circumstances etc). The kernel should also be better at detecting the really low memory circumstances, and eventually return NULL instead of just looping forever trying to find a page that it won't ever find. Linus [tytso on ext2fs changes:] These patches provide the following enhancements to ext2. * Fixed a bug where we weren't byte-swapping the feature set flags before checking EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER * Added Stephen Tweedie's patches to allow the number of file blocks which will be preallocated to be tuned (instead of being fixed at 8 blocks). * Added Stephen Tweedie's patches to allow directory blocks to be preallocated. This change is only activated if the EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_DIR_PREALLOC is enabled. (There will soon be a new release of e2fsprogs that will allow you to turn this on.) The change is compatible with older kernels (that's why it's a COMPAT feature), but we need to flag it in the feature set because the e2fsck needs a few changes to support this. * Added future support for B-trees in directories. I have a design in mind which is fully read/only compatible with the existing ext2 directories, which will make its debut in the 2.3 kernel series. This patch will allow 2.2 kernels to mount filesystems with B-tree directories read-write; if a 2.2 kernel tries to modify a B-tree directory, the B-tree valid bit will be turned off, since the B-tree structures won't be updated by 2.2 kernels. 2.0 kernels will be able to mount filesystems with B-tree directories read-only. This defines a new feature, EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BTREE_DIR. * Added Jakub Jelinek's support for large files on 64-bit platforms. On a 64-bit platform, the first time you expand a file past the 32-bit boundary, the EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE is turned on. 2.0 machines will be able to mount such filesystems read-only. 2.2 kernels on 32-bit platforms will be able such filesystems read-write, but they will only be able to see the first 2**32 bytes of the file, and any attempt to open a large file for read/write access will cause an EBIGF error. * Added support for storing the file type in the directory entry. This optimization was added to BSD 4.4 and makes a very big difference for a number of operations, since application programs can avoid doing a stat in a number of situations. Support for this is in the GNU user-land utilities, and is in glibc already. Beyond this patch, we also need to implement a new getdents system call that will return the information all the way to libc. The reason why it's important to get this change into 2.2 is that it requires "stealing" 8-bits from the name_len field of the directory entry. Ext2fs limits you to 255 characters in a file name, so the high-byte of name_len is always zero. However, older kernels look at both bytes of name_len, and will get confused if we try to store something there. So we can only update the file type field if the feature EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE is enabled. I want to get this support into the 2.2 kernel, since even if it isn't used much (because people will want their filesystems to be compatible with 2.0 kernels), we will be able to migrate smoothly to using this feature by default in the future.
-
Linus Torvalds authored
Ok, there's a fairly large patch out there, but as of 2.1.92 I think we have a real feature-freeze, and we'll try to get a real code-freeze going soon. There are known problems with the sound drivers etc, which is why a code-freeze isn't the best suggestion right now, and there are probably still bugs with some of the new code, but I'll freeze new features for the upcoming 2.2 kernel. Yes, some people will scream bloody murder, but others will be relieved that it finally happened. Thanks especially to David Miller who has been doing a great job of getting the TCP stack from its problems just a few weeks ago to really shining new heights. That was my main worry about 2.2 not all that long ago, and was the main reason for having such a slushy period for a while. 2.1.92 does: - ISDN updates - alpha update (yes, SMP finally works, although not really stable yet) - networking fixes - "getcwd()" system call (not very long, the dcache makes this so trivial it is scary) - the mm responsiveness updates (they were in 2.1.92-pre2, people seemed to have found them very effective) - some other (mainly driver updates) Please do test it all out. Feature-freeze doesn't mean that it is supposed to be bug-free yet, but it does mean that we should be moving into bugfixing mode in quick order. And no, this is not an April 1 thing. But this way I can use April 1 as an excuse if something doesn't actually compile. Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
I just made a real 91 on ftp.kernel.org, let's hope that this has all the sillies gone. As usual, it is prefectly smooth on my machine, but this time we also have a better chance of it being smooth on machines with less memory too, as Rik has done some good work in testing the algorithms out. So throw some problems at it to see just how good it is.. Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
We should not send an ack if we don't have any pending (in which case the DACK timer will be set) (Dave Miller)
-
Linus Torvalds authored
- the first cut of my spinlock changes wrt the task lists (Linus)
-
Linus Torvalds authored
seems to have found and fixed the TCP performance problem, which means that the code-freeze for 2.2 is going to go into effect shortly.. pre-90 does a few other minor things, like for example getting rid of kerneld because the new kmod thing is a lot simpler in many ways. Let's see what the reaction to that is, but I'm fairly certain that this was a major good thing: I've personally never liked kerneld, but kmod seems to be a much nicer and more controlled way of handling the same issues that kerneld tried to do. I'd actually almost be willing to use the thing myself, something that was never true of kerneld. This also moves the WD7000 SCSI driver to a working status again, thanks to Miroslav Zagorac. But the interesting and important part of the patches are the networking fixes from David and Bill Hawes.. Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
Subject: Re: INN doesn't work on pre-2.1.89-4 (mmap problem ?) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> I fixed _one_ silly bug wrt writeback to shared files in pre-5
-
Linus Torvalds authored
It should fix the problem another way that I'm happier with (fixing that problem also revealed a few other misuses of close_fp() due to historical reasons - the uses really needed to be "fput()"s instead). 2.1.89-4 also uses "struct file" for mmap's, which means that the problem that somebody was complaining about with mmap (that the mapping would exist even after the last "release()" on that file, and thus the file would still be active) are gone. As of -4 the kernel will guarantee that it will call the file->f_op->release() onle after there really aren't any uses of that file pointer any more.. Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
[sct] a patch against ipc/shm.c was missing from my swap patches, and another fix for spurious warnings about shared dirty pages. [changelog pieced together by davej]
-
Linus Torvalds authored
* 2.1.88, adds a bunch of new functionality to the swapper. The main changes are: * All swapping goes through the swap cache (aka. page cache) now. * There is no longer a swap lock map. Because we need to atomically test and create a new swap-cache page in order to do swap IO, it is sufficient just to lock the struct page itself. Having only one layer of locking to deal with removes a number of races concerning swapping shared pages. * We can swap shared pages, and still keep them shared when they are swapped back in!!! Currently, only private shared pages (as in pages shared after a fork()) benefit from this, but the basic mechanism will be appropriate for MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED pages too (implementation to follow). Pages will remain shared after a swapoff. * The page cache is now quite happy dealing with swap-cache pages too. In particular, write-ahead and read-ahead of swap through the page cache will work fine (and in fact, write-ahead does get done already under certain circumstances with this patch --- that's essentially how the swapping of shared pages gets done). Support code to perform asynchronous readahead of swap is included, but is not actually used anywhere yet. I've tested with a number of forked processes running with a shared working set larger than physical memory, and with SysV shared memory. I haven't found any problems with it so far. Linus: I've also changed the way we consider us to need more memory in kswapd, but that was entirely orthogonal and did not impact these patches. ] [Changelog pieced together by davej]
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
Ok, 2.1.87 is out there on ftp.kernel.org now, and it has the clever PROT_NONE thing done. It seems to work for the little test-case I wrote, and I also verified that swapping still works, so it seems to be all ok. I'd still like people who have test programs or similar to actually check it out, Linus
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-