Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 13 Oct, 2015 2 commits
    • Robin Ruede's avatar
      btrfs: fix resending received snapshot with parent · b96b1db0
      Robin Ruede authored 
      This fixes a regression introduced by 37b8d27d between v4.1 and v4.2.

When a snapshot is received, its received_uuid is set to the original
uuid of the subvolume. When that snapshot is then resent to a third
filesystem, it's received_uuid is set to the second uuid
instead of the original one. The same was true for the parent_uuid.
This behaviour was partially changed in 37b8d27d, but in that patch
only the parent_uuid was taken from the real original,
not the uuid itself, causing the search for the parent to fail in
the case below.

This happens for example when trying to send a series of linked
snapshots (e.g. created by snapper) from the backup file system back
to the original one.

The following commands reproduce the issue in v4.2.1
(no error in 4.1.6)

    # setup three test file systems
    for i in 1 2 3; do
	    truncate -s 50M fs$i
	    mkfs.btrfs fs$i
	    mkdir $i
	    mount fs$i $i
    done
    echo "content" > 1/testfile
    btrfs su snapshot -r 1/ 1/snap1
    echo "changed content" > 1/testfile
    btrfs su snapshot -r 1/ 1/snap2

    # works fine:
    btrfs send 1/snap1 | btrfs receive 2/
    btrfs send -p 1/snap1 1/snap2 | btrfs receive 2/

    # ERROR: could not find parent subvolume
    btrfs send 2/snap1 | btrfs receive 3/
    btrfs send -p 2/snap1 2/snap2 | btrfs receive 3/
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobin Ruede <rruede+git@gmail.com>
Fixes: 37b8d27d ("Btrfs: use received_uuid of parent during send")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
Reviewed-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: default avatarEd Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
      b96b1db0
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations · d906d49f
      Filipe Manana authored 
      If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing
the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone
operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item
and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points
to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not
exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length
will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the
one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and
full send operations.

So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover
regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes).

The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem.

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"

  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -fr $send_files_dir
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _need_to_be_root
  _require_cp_reflink
  _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch"

  send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq

  rm -f $seqres.full
  rm -fr $send_files_dir
  mkdir $send_files_dir

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  # Create our test file with a single 100K extent.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \
     $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io

  # Clone our file into a new file named bar.
  cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  # Now overwrite parts of our foo file.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \
     -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \
     -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \
     $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io

  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
     $SCRATCH_MNT/snap

  echo "File digests in the original filesystem:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch

  _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap

  # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify
  # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
  _scratch_unmount
  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap

  # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file
  # data as the original filesystem.
  # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone
  # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[
  # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect
  # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after
  # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies
  # (cloned extents).
  echo "File digests in the new filesystem:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch

  status=0
  exit

Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed
extents:

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"

  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -fr $send_files_dir
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _need_to_be_root
  _require_cp_reflink

  send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq

  rm -f $seqres.full
  rm -fr $send_files_dir
  mkdir $send_files_dir

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount "-o compress"

  # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K"       \
                  -c "fsync"                        \
                  $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io

  # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new
  # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K"    \
          -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K"      \
          $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io

  # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata:
  #
  # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K;
  # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first
  #    extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value
  #    40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that
  #    extent);
  # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K.

  # Now clone our file foo into file bar.
  cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  # Create our snapshot for the send operation.
  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
          $SCRATCH_MNT/snap

  echo "File digests in the original filesystem:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch

  _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap

  # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we
  # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
  # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range
  # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed
  # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad
  # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct
  # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[.
  _scratch_unmount
  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount "-o compress"

  _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap

  echo "File digests in the new filesystem:"
  # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem.
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch

  status=0
  exit
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      d906d49f
  3. 12 Oct, 2015 3 commits
  5. 11 Oct, 2015 8 commits
  7. 10 Oct, 2015 18 commits
  9. 09 Oct, 2015 9 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7