- 16 Jun, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Zhengchao Shao authored
Before detach the prog, we should check detach prog exist or not. Signed-off-by:
Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by:
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220606005425.261967-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com
-
- 14 Jun, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Yonghong Song authored
Commit 704c91e5 ('selftests/bpf: Test "bpftool gen min_core_btf"') added a test test_core_btfgen to test core relocation with btf generated with 'bpftool gen min_core_btf'. Currently, among 76 subtests, 25 are skipped. ... #46/69 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval:OK #46/70 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___diff:OK #46/71 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___val3_missing:OK #46/72 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___err_missing:SKIP #46/73 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val:OK #46/74 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___diff:OK #46/75 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___val3_missing:OK #46/76 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing:SKIP ... #46 core_reloc_btfgen:SKIP Summary: 1/51 PASSED, 25 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Alexei found that in the above core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing should not be skipped. Currently, the core_reloc tests have some negative tests. In Commit 704c91e5, for core_reloc_btfgen, all negative tests are skipped with the following condition if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->fails) { test__skip(); continue; } This is too conservative. Negative tests do not fail mkstemp() and run_btfgen() should not be skipped. There are a few negative tests indeed failing run_btfgen() and this patch added 'run_btfgen_fails' to mark these tests so that they can be skipped for btfgen tests. With this, we have ... #46/69 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval:OK #46/70 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___diff:OK #46/71 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___val3_missing:OK #46/72 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___err_missing:OK #46/73 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val:OK #46/74 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___diff:OK #46/75 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___val3_missing:OK #46/76 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing:OK ... Summary: 1/62 PASSED, 14 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Totally 14 subtests are skipped instead of 25. Reported-by:
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614055526.628299-1-yhs@fb.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
With latest llvm15, test_varlen failed with the following verifier log: 17: (85) call bpf_probe_read_kernel_str#115 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=-4095,smax=256) 18: (bf) r1 = r0 ; R0_w=scalar(id=1,smin=-4095,smax=256) R1_w=scalar(id=1,smin=-4095,smax=256) 19: (67) r1 <<= 32 ; R1_w=scalar(smax=1099511627776,umax=18446744069414584320,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min=0,s32_max=0,u32_max=) 20: (bf) r2 = r1 ; R1_w=scalar(id=2,smax=1099511627776,umax=18446744069414584320,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min=0,s32_max=0,u32) 21: (c7) r2 s>>= 32 ; R2=scalar(smin=-2147483648,smax=256) ; if (len >= 0) { 22: (c5) if r2 s< 0x0 goto pc+7 ; R2=scalar(umax=256,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff)) ; payload4_len1 = len; 23: (18) r2 = 0xffffc90000167418 ; R2_w=map_value(off=1048,ks=4,vs=1572,imm=0) 25: (63) *(u32 *)(r2 +0) = r0 ; R0=scalar(id=1,smin=-4095,smax=256) R2_w=map_value(off=1048,ks=4,vs=1572,imm=0) 26: (77) r1 >>= 32 ; R1_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; payload += len; 27: (18) r6 = 0xffffc90000167424 ; R6_w=map_value(off=1060,ks=4,vs=1572,imm=0) 29: (0f) r6 += r1 ; R1_w=Pscalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=map_value(off=1060,ks=4,vs=1572,umax=4294967295,var_off=(0) ; len = bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(payload, MAX_LEN, &buf_in2[0]); 30: (bf) r1 = r6 ; R1_w=map_value(off=1060,ks=4,vs=1572,umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=map_value(off=1060,ks=4,vs=1572,um) 31: (b7) r2 = 256 ; R2_w=256 32: (18) r3 = 0xffffc90000164100 ; R3_w=map_value(off=256,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) 34: (85) call bpf_probe_read_kernel_str#115 R1 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any such access processed 27 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 2 peak_states 2 mark_read 1 -- END PROG LOAD LOG -- libbpf: failed to load program 'handler32_signed' The failure is due to 20: (bf) r2 = r1 ; R1_w=scalar(id=2,smax=1099511627776,umax=18446744069414584320,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min=0,s32_max=0,u32) 21: (c7) r2 s>>= 32 ; R2=scalar(smin=-2147483648,smax=256) 22: (c5) if r2 s< 0x0 goto pc+7 ; R2=scalar(umax=256,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff)) 26: (77) r1 >>= 32 ; R1_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 29: (0f) r6 += r1 ; R1_w=Pscalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=map_value(off=1060,ks=4,vs=1572,umax=4294967295,var_off=(0) where r1 has conservative value range compared to r2 and r1 is used later. In llvm, commit [1] triggered the above code generation and caused verification failure. It may take a while for llvm to address this issue. In the main time, let us change the variable 'len' type to 'long' and adjust condition properly. Tested with llvm14 and latest llvm15, both worked fine. [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D126647Signed-off-by: -
Quentin Monnet authored
The function always returns 0, so we don't need to check whether the return value is 0 or not. This change was first introduced in commit a777e18f ("bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK"), but later reverted to restore the unconditional rlimit bump in bpftool. Let's re-add it. Co-developed-by:
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220610112648.29695-3-quentin@isovalent.com
-
Quentin Monnet authored
This reverts commit a777e18f. In commit a777e18f ("bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK"), we removed the rlimit bump in bpftool, because the kernel has switched to memcg-based memory accounting. Thanks to the LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, we attempted to keep compatibility with other systems and ask libbpf to raise the limit for us if necessary. How do we know if memcg-based accounting is supported? There is a probe in libbpf to check this. But this probe currently relies on the availability of a given BPF helper, bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns(), which landed in the same kernel version as the memory accounting change. This works in the generic case, but it may fail, for example, if the helper function has been backported to an older kernel. This has been observed for Google Cloud's Container-Optimized OS (COS), where the helper is available but rlimit is still in use. The probe succeeds, the rlimit is not raised, and probing features with bpftool, for example, fails. A patch was submitted [0] to update this probe in libbpf, based on what the cilium/ebpf Go library does [1]. It would lower the soft rlimit to 0, attempt to load a BPF object, and reset the rlimit. But it may induce some hard-to-debug flakiness if another process starts, or the current application is killed, while the rlimit is reduced, and the approach was discarded. As a workaround to ensure that the rlimit bump does not depend on the availability of a given helper, we restore the unconditional rlimit bump in bpftool for now. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220609143614.97837-1-quentin@isovalent.com/ [1] https://github.com/cilium/ebpf/blob/v0.9.0/rlimit/rlimit.go#L39Signed-off-by:
-
YueHaibing authored
Since commit b18bea2a ("ARM: net: bpf: improve 64-bit ALU implementation") this is unused anymore, so can remove it. Signed-off-by:
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Andrii reported a bug with the following information: 2859 if (enum64_placeholder_id == 0) { 2860 enum64_placeholder_id = btf__add_int(btf, "enum64_placeholder", 1, 0); >>> CID 394804: Control flow issues (NO_EFFECT) >>> This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true. "enum64_placeholder_id < 0U". 2861 if (enum64_placeholder_id < 0) 2862 return enum64_placeholder_id; 2863 ... Here enum64_placeholder_id declared as '__u32' so enum64_placeholder_id < 0 is always false. Declare enum64_placeholder_id as 'int' in order to capture the potential error properly. Fixes: f2a62588 ("libbpf: Add enum64 sanitization") Reported-by: -
Hongyi Lu authored
Minor spelling fix spotted in bpf_verifier.h. Spelling is no big deal, but it is still an improvement when reading through the code. Signed-off-by:
Hongyi Lu <jwnhy0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 11 Jun, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Alexei Starovoitov authored
Feng zhou says: ==================== From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com> We encountered bad case on big system with 96 CPUs that alloc_htab_elem() would last for 1ms. The reason is that after the prealloc hashtab has no free elems, when trying to update, it will still grab spin_locks of all cpus. If there are multiple update users, the competition is very serious. 0001: Use head->first to check whether the free list is empty or not before taking the lock. 0002: Add benchmark to reproduce this worst case. Changelog: v5->v6: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov. - Adjust the commit log. some details in here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220608021050.47279-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/ v4->v5: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov. - Use head->first. - Use cpu+max_entries. some details in here: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220601084149.13097-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/ v3->v4: Addressed comments from Daniel Borkmann. - Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. some details in here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220530091340.53443-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/ v2->v3: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko. - Adjust the way the benchmark is tested. - Adjust the code format. some details in here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524075306.32306-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/T/ v1->v2: Addressed comments from Alexei Starovoitov. - add a benchmark to reproduce the issue. - Adjust the code format that avoid adding indent. some details in here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/877ac441-045b-1844-6938-fcaee5eee7f2@bytedance.com/T/ ==================== Signed-off-by:
-
Feng Zhou authored
Add benchmark for hash_map to reproduce the worst case that non-stop update when map's free is zero. Just like this: ./run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh Setting up benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update'... Benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update' started. 1:hash_map_full_perf 555830 events per sec ... Signed-off-by:
Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610023308.93798-3-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.comSigned-off-by:
-
Feng Zhou authored
This patch use head->first in pcpu_freelist_head to check freelist having free or not. If having, grab spin_lock, or check next cpu's freelist. Before patch: hash_map performance ./map_perf_test 1 0:hash_map_perf pre-alloc 1043397 events per sec ... The average of the test results is around 1050000 events per sec. hash_map the worst: no free ./run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh Setting up benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update'... Benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update' started. 1:hash_map_full_perf 15687 events per sec ... The average of the test results is around 16000 events per sec. ftrace trace: 0) | htab_map_update_elem() { 0) | __pcpu_freelist_pop() { 0) | _raw_spin_lock() 0) | _raw_spin_unlock() 0) | ... 0) + 25.188 us | } 0) + 28.439 us | } The test machine is 16C, trying to get spin_lock 17 times, in addition to 16c, there is an extralist. after patch: hash_map performance ./map_perf_test 1 0:hash_map_perf pre-alloc 1053298 events per sec ... The average of the test results is around 1050000 events per sec. hash_map worst: no free ./run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh Setting up benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update'... Benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update' started. 1:hash_map_full_perf 555830 events per sec ... The average of the test results is around 550000 events per sec. ftrace trace: 0) | htab_map_update_elem() { 0) | alloc_htab_elem() { 0) 0.586 us | __pcpu_freelist_pop(); 0) 0.945 us | } 0) 8.669 us | } It can be seen that after adding this patch, the map performance is almost not degraded, and when free=0, first check head->first instead of directly acquiring spin_lock. Co-developed-by:Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 09 Jun, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Andrii Nakryiko authored
Fix libbpf's bpf_program__attach_uprobe() logic of determining function's *file offset* (which is what kernel is actually expecting) when attaching uprobe/uretprobe by function name. Previously calculation was determining virtual address offset relative to base load address, which (offset) is not always the same as file offset (though very frequently it is which is why this went unnoticed for a while). Fixes: 433966e3 ("libbpf: Support function name-based attach uprobes") Signed-off-by:
-
Kosuke Fujimoto authored
"BFP" should be "BPF" Signed-off-by:
Kosuke Fujimoto <fujimotokosuke0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Shahab Vahedi authored
This change adjusts the Makefile to use "HOSTAR" as the archive tool to keep the sanity of the build process for the bootstrap part in check. For the rationale, please continue reading. When cross compiling bpftool with buildroot, it leads to an invocation like: $ AR="/path/to/buildroot/host/bin/arc-linux-gcc-ar" \ CC="/path/to/buildroot/host/bin/arc-linux-gcc" \ ... make Which in return fails while building the bootstrap section: ----------------------------------8<---------------------------------- make: Entering directory '/src/bpftool-v6.7.0/src' ... libbfd: [ on ] ... disassembler-four-args: [ on ] ... zlib: [ on ] ... libcap: [ OFF ] ... clang-bpf-co-re: [ on ] <-- triggers bootstrap . . . LINK /src/bpftool-v6.7.0/src/bootstrap/bpftool /usr/bin/ld: /src/bpftool-v6.7.0/src/bootstrap/libbpf/libbpf.a: error adding symbols: archive has no index; run ranlib to add one collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [Makefile:211: /src/bpftool-v6.7.0/src/bootstrap/bpftool] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... AR /src/bpftool-v6.7.0/src/libbpf/libbpf.a make[1]: Leaving directory '/src/bpftool-v6.7.0/libbpf/src' make: Leaving directory '/src/bpftool-v6.7.0/src' ---------------------------------->8---------------------------------- This occurs because setting "AR" confuses the build process for the bootstrap section and it calls "arc-linux-gcc-ar" to create and index "libbpf.a" instead of the host "ar". Signed-off-by:Shahab Vahedi <shahab@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 07 Jun, 2022 18 commits
-
-
Alexei Starovoitov authored
Yonghong Song says: ==================== Currently, btf only supports upto 32bit enum value with BTF_KIND_ENUM. But in kernel, some enum has 64bit values, e.g., in uapi bpf.h, we have enum { BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 0xffffffffULL, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK, BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = (0xfffffULL << 32), }; With BTF_KIND_ENUM, the value for BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK will be encoded as 0 which is incorrect. To solve this problem, BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is proposed in this patch set to support enum 64bit values. Also, since sometimes there is a need to generate C code from btf, e.g., vmlinux.h, btf kflag support is also added for BTF_KIND_ENUM and BTF_KIND_ENUM64 to indicate signedness, helping proper value printout. Changelog: v4 -> v5: - skip newly-added enum64 C test if clang version <= 14. v3 -> v4: - rename btf_type_is_any_enum() to btf_is_any_enum() to favor consistency in libbpf. - fix sign extension issue in btf_dump_get_enum_value(). - fix BPF_CORE_FIELD_SIGNED signedness issue in bpf_core_calc_field_relo(). v2 -> v3: - Implement separate btf_equal_enum()/btf_equal_enum64() and btf_compat_enum()/btf_compat_enum64(). - Add a new enum64 placeholder type dynamicly for enum64 sanitization. - For bpftool output and unit selftest, printed out signed/unsigned encoding as well. - fix some issues with BTF_KIND_ENUM is doc and clarified sign extension rules for enum values. v1 -> v2: - Changed kflag default from signed to unsigned - Fixed sanitization issue - Broke down libbpf related patches for easier review - Added more tests - More code refactorization - Corresponding llvm patch (to support enum64) is also updated ==================== Signed-off-by: -
Yonghong Song authored
Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 documentation in btf.rst. Also fixed a typo for section number for BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG from 2.2.17 to 2.2.18, and fixed a type size issue for BTF_KIND_ENUM. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add a test for enum64 value relocations. The test will be skipped if clang version is 14 or lower since enum64 is only supported from version 15. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add a few unit tests for BTF_KIND_ENUM64 deduplication. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add unit tests for basic BTF_KIND_ENUM64 encoding. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add tests to use the new enum kflag and enum64 API functions in selftest btf_write. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
The kflag is supported now for BTF_KIND_ENUM. So remove the test which tests verifier failure due to existence of kflag. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support. For example, the following enum is defined in uapi bpf.h. $ cat core.c enum A { BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 0xffffffffULL, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK, BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = (0xfffffULL << 32), } g; Compiled with clang -target bpf -O2 -g -c core.c Using bpftool to dump types and generate format C file: $ bpftool btf dump file core.o ... [1] ENUM64 'A' encoding=UNSIGNED size=8 vlen=3 'BPF_F_INDEX_MASK' val=4294967295ULL 'BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU' val=4294967295ULL 'BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK' val=4503595332403200ULL $ bpftool btf dump file core.o format c ... enum A { BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 4294967295ULL, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = 4294967295ULL, BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = 4503595332403200ULL, }; ... Note that for raw btf output, the encoding (UNSIGNED or SIGNED) is printed out as well. The 64bit value is also represented properly in BTF and C dump. Acked-by: -
Yonghong Song authored
The enum64 relocation support is added. The bpf local type could be either enum or enum64 and the remote type could be either enum or enum64 too. The all combinations of local enum/enum64 and remote enum/enum64 are supported. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support for bpf linking, which is very similar to BTF_KIND_ENUM. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
When old kernel does not support enum64 but user space btf contains non-zero enum kflag or enum64, libbpf needs to do proper sanitization so modified btf can be accepted by the kernel. Sanitization for enum kflag can be achieved by clearing the kflag bit. For enum64, the type is replaced with an union of integer member types and the integer member size must be smaller than enum64 size. If such an integer type cannot be found, a new type is created and used for union members. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add enum64 btf dumping support. For long long and unsigned long long dump, suffixes 'LL' and 'ULL' are added to avoid compilation errors in some cases. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add enum64 deduplication support. BTF_KIND_ENUM64 handling is very similar to BTF_KIND_ENUM. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add enum64 parsing support and two new enum64 public APIs: btf__add_enum64 btf__add_enum64_value Also add support of signedness for BTF_KIND_ENUM. The BTF_KIND_ENUM API signatures are not changed. The signedness will be changed from unsigned to signed if btf__add_enum_value() finds any negative values. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Refactor btf__add_enum() function to create a separate function btf_add_enum_common() so later the common function can be used to add enum64 btf type. There is no functionality change for this patch. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Currently, the 64bit relocation value in the instruction is computed as follows: __u64 imm = insn[0].imm + ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32) Suppose insn[0].imm = -1 (0xffffffff) and insn[1].imm = 1. With the above computation, insn[0].imm will first sign-extend to 64bit -1 (0xffffffffFFFFFFFF) and then add 0x1FFFFFFFF, producing incorrect value 0xFFFFFFFF. The correct value should be 0x1FFFFFFFF. Changing insn[0].imm to __u32 first will prevent 64bit sign extension and fix the issue. Merging high and low 32bit values also changed from '+' to '|' to be consistent with other similar occurences in kernel and libbpf. Acked-by:
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Currently, the libbpf limits the relocation value to be 32bit since all current relocations have such a limit. But with BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support, the enum value could be 64bit. So let us permit 64bit relocation value in libbpf. Acked-by:
-
Yonghong Song authored
Currently, BTF only supports upto 32bit enum value with BTF_KIND_ENUM. But in kernel, some enum indeed has 64bit values, e.g., in uapi bpf.h, we have enum { BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 0xffffffffULL, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK, BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = (0xfffffULL << 32), }; In this case, BTF_KIND_ENUM will encode the value of BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK as 0, which certainly is incorrect. This patch added a new btf kind, BTF_KIND_ENUM64, which permits 64bit value to cover the above use case. The BTF_KIND_ENUM64 has the following three fields followed by the common type: struct bpf_enum64 { __u32 nume_off; __u32 val_lo32; __u32 val_hi32; }; Currently, btf type section has an alignment of 4 as all element types are u32. Representing the value with __u64 will introduce a pad for bpf_enum64 and may also introduce misalignment for the 64bit value. Hence, two members of val_hi32 and val_lo32 are chosen to avoid these issues. The kflag is also introduced for BTF_KIND_ENUM and BTF_KIND_ENUM64 to indicate whether the value is signed or unsigned. The kflag intends to provide consistent output of BTF C fortmat with the original source code. For example, the original BTF_KIND_ENUM bit value is 0xffffffff. The format C has two choices, printing out 0xffffffff or -1 and current libbpf prints out as unsigned value. But if the signedness is preserved in btf, the value can be printed the same as the original source code. The kflag value 0 means unsigned values, which is consistent to the default by libbpf and should also cover most cases as well. The new BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is intended to support the enum value represented as 64bit value. But it can represent all BTF_KIND_ENUM values as well. The compiler ([1]) and pahole will generate BTF_KIND_ENUM64 only if the value has to be represented with 64 bits. In addition, a static inline function btf_kind_core_compat() is introduced which will be used later when libbpf relo_core.c changed. Here the kernel shares the same relo_core.c with libbpf. [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D124641Acked-by:
-
- 03 Jun, 2022 5 commits
-
-
Hangbin Liu authored
As subject, we only test SKB mode for xdping at present. Now add DRV mode for xdping. Signed-off-by:
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220602032507.464453-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com
-
Yuze Chi authored
Move the correct definition from linker.c into libbpf_internal.h. Fixes: 0087a681 ("libbpf: Automatically fix up BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF size, if necessary") Reported-by:
Yuze Chi <chiyuze@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Martin KaFai Lau authored
tc_redirect_dtime was reported flaky from time to time. It always fails at the udp test and complains about the bpf@tc-ingress got a skb->tstamp when handling udp packet. It is unexpected because the skb->tstamp should have been cleared when crossing different netns. The most likely cause is that the skb is actually a tcp packet from the earlier tcp test. It could be the final TCP_FIN handling. This patch tightens the skb->tstamp check in the bpf prog. It ensures the skb is the current testing traffic. First, it checks that skb matches the IPPROTO of the running test (i.e. tcp vs udp). Second, it checks the server port (dst_ns_port). The server port is unique for each test (50000 + test_enum). Also fixed a typo in test_udp_dtime(): s/P100/P101/ Fixes: c803475f ("bpf: selftests: test skb->tstamp in redirect_neigh") Reported-by:
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Xu authored
These checks were effectively noops b/c there's only one way these functions get called: through prog_ops dispatching. And since there's no other callers, we can be sure that `prog` is always the correct type. Signed-off-by:
Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Müller authored
This change fixes a couple of typos that were encountered while studying the source code. Signed-off-by:
Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by:
-
- 02 Jun, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Wang Yufen authored
During TCP sockmap redirect pressure test, the following warning is triggered: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2145 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xbc/0xd0 CPU: 3 PID: 2145 Comm: iperf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.10.0+ #9 Call Trace: inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110 inet_csk_listen_stop+0xbb/0x380 tcp_close+0x41b/0x480 inet_release+0x42/0x80 __sock_release+0x3d/0xa0 sock_close+0x11/0x20 __fput+0x9d/0x240 task_work_run+0x62/0x90 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x110/0x120 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The reason we observed is that: When the listener is closing, a connection may have completed the three-way handshake but not accepted, and the client has sent some packets. The child sks in accept queue release by inet_child_forget()->inet_csk_destroy_sock(), but psocks of child sks have not released. To fix, add sock_map_destroy to release psocks. Signed-off-by:
Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Acked-by:
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220524075311.649153-1-wangyufen@huawei.com
-
Lorenzo Bianconi authored
Forward the packet to the kernel if the gw router mac address is missing in to trigger ARP discovery. Fixes: 85bf1f51 ("samples: bpf: Convert xdp_router_ipv4 to XDP samples helper") Signed-off-by:
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Douglas Raillard authored
One strategy employed by libbpf to guess the pointer size is by finding the size of "unsigned long" type. This is achieved by looking for a type of with the expected name and checking its size. Unfortunately, the C syntax is friendlier to humans than to computers as there is some variety in how such a type can be named. Specifically, gcc and clang do not use the same names for integer types in debug info: - clang uses "unsigned long" - gcc uses "long unsigned int" Lookup all the names for such a type so that libbpf can hope to find the information it wants. Signed-off-by:Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
