- 26 Sep, 2013 40 commits
-
-
Lee Jones authored
There are no more devices which require left to register which require a parent. This is part of the ux500 conversion over to Device Tree only booting. Signed-off-by:
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
This is part of the ux500 conversion over to Device Tree only booting, but this stuff haven't been used for years. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
These are now cared for from the Device Tree. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
We still need to utilise the AUXDATA system for the PRCMU to pass through platform data which can not be DT:ed i.e. regulator initialisation values. All we're doing in this patch is changing the comment header to be more accurate. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
MSP no longer requires clock-name bindings, so we need to move them to a more appropriate header indicating that we're still passing DMA related platform data to them. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
The ux500 platform will soon be converted to Device Tree only. When that happens the old clock initialisation will be ripped out. In the meantime however, we have to make a decision and call the appropriate initialisation code manually. Signed-off-by:
-
